Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:57:34.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global trends of antibiotics research: comparison using network analysis to map the tendencies of antibiotics in water, soil and sediment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2021

Chunli ZHENG ,
Hongkai LIAO  and
Chenglong TU Open the ORCID record for Chenglong TU [Opens in a new window]
Chunli ZHENG
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Monitoring and Disease Control, Ministry of Education, Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang550025, People's Republic of China.
Hongkai LIAO
Affiliation:
Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Mountain Environment, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang550001, People's Republic of China.
Chenglong TU*
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Monitoring and Disease Control, Ministry of Education, Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang550025, People's Republic of China.
*
*Corresponding author. Email: chenglongtu@163.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Antibiotic residues have entered into the environment owing to the unreasonable use and disposal of antibiotics. The emergence of antibiotic resistance poses a huge threat to ecosystems and human health. In this study, the network analysis method was used to compare publications on antibiotics in water, soil and sediment from the aspects of countries, institutes, journals, subject categories and keywords based on Web of Science Core Collection. The results indicated that the United States of America and China had dominant positions of studies on antibiotics. The Chinese Academy of Sciences published the most articles on antibiotic research. ‘Chemosphere’, ‘Science of the Total Environment’, ‘Environmental Science and Technology’ and ‘Applied and Environmental Microbiology’ all appeared in the top six journals. ‘Environmental Sciences and Ecology’ was the core subject category of antibiotic research. Further analysis results depicted that ‘Antibiotics’, ‘Tetracycline’ and ‘Antibiotic Resistance’ were found as the research hotspots. Tetracycline and oxytetracycline all showed in the top 50 keywords of antibiotics research in water, soil and sediment. However, chlortetracycline, sulfadiazine and tylosin all emerged only in the top 50 keywords of antibiotics study in soil. In future, more attention should be paid to antibiotic resistance genes and antibiotic resistance bacteria in antibiotics research.

Keywords

network analysisinternational collaborationsjournalssubject categoriesresearch hotspotssediments
Type
Articles
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 112 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 51 - 60
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Society of Edinburgh

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Authors have the same contribution to this article.

References

6. References

Aminov, R. I. 2010. A brief history of the antibiotic era: lessons learned and challenges for the future. Frontiers in Microbiology 1, 134.10.3389/fmicb.2010.00134CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, D., Hilton, M. & Thomas, K. V. 2004. Investigating the environmental transport of human pharmaceuticals to streams in the United Kingdom. Science of the Total Environment 333, 167–84.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.062CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baquero, F., Martinez, J. L. & Canton, R. 2008. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in water environments. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 19, 260–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batagelj, V. & Mrvar, A. 2011. Pajek: program for analysis and visualization of large networks. Slovenia: University of Ljubljana.Google Scholar
Breda, S. A., Jimenez-Kairuz, A. F., Manzo, R. H. & Olivera, M. E. 2009. Solubility behavior and biopharmaceutical classification of novel high-solubility ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin pharmaceutical derivatives. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 371, 106–13.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.12.026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Y. C., Yeh, H. Y., Wu, J. C., Haschler, I., Chen, T. J. & Wetter, T. 2010. Taiwan's national health insurance research database: administrative health care database as study object in bibliometrics. Scientometrics 86, 365–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, Y., Ji, Y., Kong, D., Lu, J. & Zhou, Q. 2015. Kinetic and mechanistic investigations of the degradation of sulfamethazine in heat-activated persulfate oxidation process. Journal of Hazardous Materials 300, 39–47.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.06.058CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrey, M. L., Heiskary, S., Grace, R., Hamilton, M. C. & Lueck, A. 2015. Pharmaceuticals and other anthropogenic tracers in surface water: a randomized survey of 50 Minnesota lakes. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 34, 2475–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glanzel, W. & Schoepflin, U. 1999. A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences. Information Processing and Management 35, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halling-Sørensen, B., Nors Nielsen, S., Lanzky, P. F., Ingerslev, F., Holten Lützhøft, H. C. & Jørgensen, S. E. 1998. Occurrence, fate and effects of pharmaceutical substances in the environment--a review. Chemosphere 36, 357–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirsch, R., Ternes, T., Haberer, K. & Kratz, K.-L. 1999. Occurrence of antibiotics in the aquatic environment. Science of the Total Environment 225, 109–18.10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00337-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaimes-Correa, J. C., Snow, D. D. & Bartelt-Hunt, S. L. 2015. Seasonal occurrence of antibiotics and a beta agonist in an agriculturally-intensive watershed. Environmental Pollution 205, 87–96.10.1016/j.envpol.2015.05.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. D., Cho, J., Kim, I. S., Vanderford, B. J. & Snyder, S. A. 2007. Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and endocrine disruptors in South Korean surface, drinking, and waste waters. Water Research 41, 1013–21.10.1016/j.watres.2006.06.034CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, S. & Carlson, K. 2007. Temporal and spatial trends in the occurrence of human and veterinary antibiotics in aqueous and river sediment matrices. Environmental Science and Technology 41, 50–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosutic, K., Dolar, D., Asperger, D. & Kunst, B. 2007. Removal of antibiotics from a model wastewater by RO/NF membranes. Separation and Purification Technology 53, 244–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küçükdoğan, A., Güven, B. & Balcıoğlu, I. 2015. Mapping the environmental risk of antibiotic contamination by using multi-criteria decision analysis. CLEAN - Soil, Air, Water 43, 1316–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kummerer, K. 2003. Significance of antibiotics in the environment. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 52, 5–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kummerer, K. 2009. Antibiotics in the aquatic environment--a review--part I. Chemosphere 75, 417–34.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.11.086CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liang, X., Chen, B., Nie, X., Shi, Z., Huang, X. & Li, X. 2013. The distribution and partitioning of common antibiotics in water and sediment of the Pearl River Estuary, South China. Chemosphere 92, 1410–6.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.03.044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, L., Yuan, K., Liang, X., Chen, X., Zhao, Z., Yang, Y., Zou, S., Luan, T. & Chen, B. 2015. Occurrences and distribution of sulfonamide and tetracycline resistance genes in the Yangtze River Estuary and nearby coastal area. Marine Pollution Bulletin 100, 304–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mao, G., Liu, X., Du, H., Zuo, J. & Wang, L. 2015a. Way forward for alternative energy research: a bibliometric analysis during 1994–2013. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 48, 276–86.10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, G., Zou, H., Chen, G., Du, H. & Zuo, J. 2015b. Past, current and future of biomass energy research: a bibliometric analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 52, 1823–33.10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, J. L. 2008. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments. Science (New York, N.Y.) 321, 365–7.10.1126/science.1159483CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez, J. L. 2009. Environmental pollution by antibiotics and by antibiotic resistance determinants. Environmental Pollution 157, 2893–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matongo, S., Birungi, G., Moodley, B. & Ndungu, P. 2015. Pharmaceutical residues in water and sediment of Msunduzi River, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Chemosphere 134, 133–40.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.093CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naslund, J., Hedman, J. E. & Agestrand, C. 2008. Effects of the antibiotic ciprofloxacin on the bacterial community structure and degradation of pyrene in marine sediment. Aquatic Toxicology 90, 223–7.10.1016/j.aquatox.2008.09.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pang, J., Han, C., Chao, Y., Jing, L., Ji, H., Zhu, W., Chang, Y. & Li, H. 2015. Partitioning behavior of tetracycline in hydrophobic ionic liquids two-phase systems. Separation Science and Technology 50, 1993–8.Google Scholar
Raboll, M. & Spliid, N. H. 2000. Sorption and mobility of metronidazole, olaquindox, oxytetracycline and tylosin in soil. Chemosphere 40, 715–22.10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00442-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, D. L. & Riley, C. M. 1990. Aqueous solubilities of some variously substituted quinolone antimicrobials. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 63, 237–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanches-Martinez, J. G., Perez-Castaneda, R., Rabago-Castro, J. L., Aguirre-Guzman, G. & Vazquez-Sauceda, M. L. 2008. A preliminary study on the effects on growth, condition, and feeding indexes in channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, after the prophylactic use of potassium permanganate and oxytetracycline. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 39, 664–70.10.1111/j.1749-7345.2008.00195.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, T., Kohnen, K., Jansen, B. & Obst, U. 2003. Detection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and their resistance genes in wastewater, surface water, and drinking water biofilms. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 43, 325–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ternes, T. A., Stüber, J., Herrmann, N., McDowell, D., Ried, A., Kampmann, M. & Teiser, B. 2003. Ozonation: a tool for removal of pharmaceuticals, contrast media and musk fragrances from wastewater? Water Research 37, 1976–82.10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00570-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, K. V. & Hilton, M. J. 2004. The occurrence of selected human pharmaceutical compounds in UK estuaries. Marine Pollution Bulletin 49, 436–44.10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.02.028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Topal, M. & Arslan Topal, E. I. 2015. Occurrence and fate of tetracycline and degradation products in municipal biological wastewater treatment plant and transport of them in surface water. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 187, 1–9.10.1007/s10661-015-4978-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ventola, C. L. 2015. The antibiotic resistance crisis: part 1: causes and threats. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 40, 277–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Wan, J., Zhou, L., Deng, H., Zhan, F. & Zhang, R. 2015. Oxidative degradation of sulfamethoxazole by different MnO2 nanocrystals in aqueous solution. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 407, 67–74.10.1016/j.molcata.2015.06.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z., Zhang, X. H., Huang, Y. & Wang, H. 2015. Comprehensive evaluation of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in typical highly urbanized regions across China. Environmental Pollution 204, 223–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watkinson, A. J., Murby, E. J. & Costanzo, S. D. 2007. Removal of antibiotics in conventional and advanced wastewater treatment: implications for environmental discharge and wastewater recycling. Water Research 41, 4164–76.10.1016/j.watres.2007.04.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weingart, P. 2005. Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: inadvertent consequences? Scientometrics 62, 117–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO. 2014. Antimicrobial resistance: global report on surveillance 2014. http://www.who.int/drugresistance/documents/surveillancereport/en/Google Scholar
Xu, Y. Y. & Boeing, W. J. 2013. Mapping biofuel field: A bibliometric evaluation of research output. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 28, 82–91.Google Scholar
Yin, C. Y., Aris, M. J. & Chen, X. 2009. Combination of Eigenfactor TM and h-index to evaluate scientific journals. Scientometrics 84, 639–48.10.1007/s11192-009-0116-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q. Q., Ying, G. G., Pan, C. G., Liu, Y. S. & Zhao, J. L. 2015. Comprehensive evaluation of antibiotics emission and fate in the river basins of China: source analysis, multimedia modeling, and linkage to bacterial resistance. Environmental Science and Technology 49, 6772–82.10.1021/acs.est.5b00729CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, C. L., Cotner, J. B., Sato, C., Li, G. & Xu, Y. Y. 2018. Global development of the studies focused on antibiotics in aquatic systems from 1945–2017. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25, 22023–22034.10.1007/s11356-018-2331-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Y. G., Johnson, T. A., Su, J. Q., Qiao, M., Guo, G. X., Stedtfeld, R. D., Hashsham, S. A. & Tiedje, J. M. 2013. Diverse and abundant antibiotic resistance genes in Chinese swine farms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 3435–40.10.1073/pnas.1222743110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed