Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:11:12.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XIV.—On the Relation of Nerves to Odontoblasts, and on the Growth of Dentine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2013

Extract

Clinical and pathological observation both show that the dentine of the tooth is very closely connected with the nervous system, and is in consequence highly sensitive. Upon what structures does the sensibility of the dentine depend? In what manner is the dentine connected with the nerves of the pulp so as to become so sensitive to external stimuli?

Perhaps there is no other structure in the body which is so largely supplied with nerves as the pulp of the tooth; even in the smallest fragment we find many nerve fibres. If we take the pulp from the incisor tooth of an ox and examine it after having allowed it to lie in a solution of osmic acid for a few minutes, we can see clearly through the darkened semi-transparent tissue a large blackened nerve trunk passing up the centre of the pulp, giving off on its way innumerable lateral branches, and dividing in a brush-like manner near the upper part of the pulp. All the fine branches are directed towards the periphery of the pulp. In longitudinal sections of the pulp we can see the same in greater detail; many large bundles of medullated and non-medullated nerve fibres running longitudinally near the centre and giving off lateral branches, which are found in great numbers near the periphery and divide into single nerve fibres just under the odontoblastic layer, being specially numerous at the apex of the pulp.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1892

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY.

Müller, J., Archiv, 1836, p. 3.Google Scholar
Retzius, A., “Bemerkungen über der innern Bau der Zähne, mit besonderer Rücksicht auf den im Zahnknochen vorkommenden Röhrenbau,” Müller's Archiv, 1837, p. 486.Google Scholar
Nasmyth, , Med. Chirurg. Transact., 1839, vol. xxii.Google Scholar
Prof.Goodsir, , “On the Origin and Development of the Pulp and Sacs of the Human Teeth,” Edin. Med. and Surgical Journal, 1839, vol. li.Google Scholar
Tomes, J., Dental Physiology and Surgery, 1848Google ScholarPubMed
“On Structure of Teeth,” Pro. Roy. Soc., 1838Google Scholar
“Teeth of Rodents,” Phil. Trans., 1850, p. 530Google Scholar
“On the Presence of Fibrils of Soft Tissue in the Dentinal Tubules,” Phil. Trans., 1856, p. 515.Google Scholar
Krukenberg, A., “Beitrag sur Lehre von dem Röhrensystem der Zähne und Knochen,” Müller's Archiv, 1849.Google Scholar
Owen, , Art. “Teeth,” Todd's Cyclopaedia of Anat. and Physiol., vol. iv., 1852.Google Scholar
Huxley, , Articles on Teeth in Quart. Jour. of Micros. Society, 1854, 1855, 1857, 1872, 1878.Google ScholarPubMed
Magitot, , Étude sur le Dévelop, et la Structure des Dents, Paris, 1856Google Scholar
“Mémoire sur la Genèse et la Morphologie du Follicule Dentaire chez l'Homme et les Mammifères,” Comp. Rend., 1860Google Scholar
“De la Structure et du Dévelop, du Tissu Dentinaire dans la Série Animale,” Comp. Rend., 1880, p. 1298.Google Scholar
Robin, et Magitot, , Jour. de la Physiologie, 1860, 1861.Google Scholar
Magitot, et Legros, , Jour. de l'Anat. et de la Physiol., 1866Google Scholar
“Origine et Format, du Follicule Dentaire dans les Mammifères,” Comp. Rend., 1873, p. 1000Google Scholar
“Greffes de Follicules Dentaires,” Comp. Rend., 1874, p. 357Google Scholar
Dévelop, des Dents,” Jour. de l'Anat. et de la Physiol., 1876.Google Scholar
Tomes, and de Morgan, , “Observations on the Structure and Development of Bone,” Phil. Trans., 1853.Google Scholar
Fürstenberg, , “Ueber einige Zellen mit verdickten Wänden im Thierkörper,” Müller's Archiv, 1857.Google Scholar
Kölliker, , “Manual of Human Histology,” translated by Busk, , 1860; Centralblatt, 1872.Google Scholar
Beale, , “Structure of the Simple Tissues,” Archiv of Dentistry, 1865.Google Scholar
Hertz, , “Untersuch. über den feineren Bau und die Entwicklung der Zähne,” Virchow's Archiv, 1866, Bd. 37.Google Scholar
Hohl, , “Knochenkörperchen mit eigenthümlichen Kapseln in der Zahnpulpa,” Archiv für Mikrosk. Anat. 1866.Google Scholar
Boll, F., “Untersuch. über die Zahnpulpa,” Arch, für Mikrosk. Anat., 1868, p. 73.Google Scholar
Waldeyer, W., “Human and Comparative Histology,” Stricker's Handbook, Syden. Soc., vol. i. p. 463, 1870.Google Scholar
Gegenbaur, , “Elements of Comparative Anatomy,” 1878, p. 551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomes, C. S., “Cuticula Dentis,” Quart Jour. Micr. Sci., 1872; Manual of Dental Anat., 1876;Google Scholar
On the Develop, of Teeth,” Quart. Jour. Micr. Sci., 1876;Google Scholar
“On Vascular Dentine,” Phil. Trans., 1878, p. 25.Google Scholar
Frey, , Histology, 4th edit, 1879, p. 261.Google Scholar
Prof.Rutherford, W., Text Book of Physiology, pt. i., 1880.Google Scholar
Prof. SirTurner, W., “Introduction to Human Anatomy,” 1877.Google Scholar
Klein, and Smith, Noble, Atlas of Histology, 1880.Google Scholar
Balfour, F. M., Comparative Embryology, vol. ii. p. 638, 1881.Google Scholar
Landois, and Stirling's, Physiology, 3rd edit., 1888.Google Scholar
M‘Kendrick, , Text Book of Physiology, 1889.Google Scholar
Sharpey, , Quain's Anatomy, 9th edit., 1882, vol. ii. p. 552.Google Scholar
DrBrunn, A. v., “Ueber die Ausdehnung des Schmelzorganes und seine Bedeutung für die Zahnbildung,” Archiv für Mikrosk. Anatomie, 1887, p. 367.Google Scholar