Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:49:54.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Carboniferous Archerbeck Borehole, near Canonbie (Dumfriesshire, southern Scotland): biostratigraphic revision of the late Asbian to early Pendleian succession using foraminiferans and regional correlations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2013

Pedro Cózar  and
Ian D. Somerville
Pedro Cózar
Affiliation:
Instituto de Geociencias (CSIC, UCM), Dep. de Geología sedimentaria y Cambio Ambiental, c/José Antonio Novais 2, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain. Email: pcozar@geo.ucm.es; p.cozar@igeo.ucm-csic.es
Ian D. Somerville
Affiliation:
UCD School of Geological Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. Email: ian.somerville@ucd.ie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The upper half of the Archerbeck Borehole contains a continuous Mississippian succession from the late Asbian (late Viséan) to the Pendleian (early Serpukhovian), with numerous limestone horizons. The borehole sequence lies within the Solway Basin (western end of the Northumberland Trough) and bridges the successions between the Midland Valley of Scotland and the Pennines (northern England). The rich foraminiferal and algal assemblages are compared to those described by previous authors, and genera as well as species are updated as far as is possible. In addition, some other overlooked or underestimated taxa have been identified and illustrated, which improve notably the biostratigraphic resolution of the Archerbeck Borehole succession. Within the abundant foraminiferal assemblages can be highlighted the richness and diversity of representatives of the family Archaediscidae. In general, the succession developed in the Archerbeck Borehole is closely comparable with that in the Alston Block of northern England. The Asbian/Brigantian transition mimics that observed in the Janny Wood boundary stratotype section, with clear late Asbian horizons (lower part of the Archerbeck Beds), transitional beds (middle and upper parts of the Archerbeck Beds), and Brigantian limestones (from the Cornet Limestone upwards). The base of the early Brigantian is placed at the base of the Cornet Limestone (equivalent to the Lower Peghorn Limestone in the Alston Block). The base of the late Brigantian is placed at the base of the Gastropod Limestone (equivalent to the Scar Limestone Member in northern England), and the base of the Pendleian is repositioned at the base of the Under Limestone (equivalent to the Four Fathom Limestone Member in northern England). Throughout, the borehole, protista and microfloral elements are abundant, which allows the recognition of Assemblages 4 to 10, previously recognised in northern England and the Midland Valley of Scotland. Furthermore, other local assemblages are recognised and related to palaeoecological controls, although they do not represent any improvement in biostratigraphical resolution.

Keywords

biostratigraphyBrigantianEarly SerpukhovianLate ViséanmicrofossilsMississippiannorthern EnglandSolway Basin
Type
Articles
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 103 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 105 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

9. References

Armstrong, A. K. & Mamet, B. L. 1977. Carboniferous microfacies, microfossils, and corals, Lisburne Group, Arctic Alaska. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 849, 1–144.Google Scholar
Arthurton, R. S., Johnson, E. W. & Mundy, D. J. C. 1988. Geology of the country around Settle. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, England and Wales Sheet 60. Keyworth, Nottingham; British Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Austin, R., Conil, R., Groessens, E. & Pirlet, H. 1974. Etude biostratigraphie de l'encrinite de Tramaka. Bulletin Société belge Géologique, Palaeontologie & Hydrologie 83 (2), 113–29.Google Scholar
Brady, H. B. 1876. A monograph of Carboniferous and Permian foraminifera (the genus Fusulina excepted). Palaeontographical Society of London 30, 1–166.Google Scholar
Brazhnikova, N. E. 1964. [On the study of Eosigmoilina from the Lower Carboniferous of the Greater Donets Basin]. Akademiya Nauk Ukrainskoi SSR, Trudy Instituta Geologicheskikh Nauk, Seriya Stratigrafii i Paleontologii 48, 3–15. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Brenckle, P. L. 1993. Type Archaediscacean foraminifers (Carboniferous) from the former Soviet Union and Great Britain. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication 30, 6–58.Google Scholar
Brenckle, P. L., Ramsbottom, W. H. C. & Marchant, T. R. 1987. Taxonomy and classification of Carboniferous Archaediscean foraminifers. Courier Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg 98, 11–24.Google Scholar
Bykova, N. K., Balakmatova, V. T., Vassilenko, V. P., Voloshina, N. A., Dain, L. G., Ivanova, L. V., Kusina, V. I., Kuznetsova, S. v., Koryseva, V. F., Morozova, V. G., Maitliuk, E. V. & Subbotina, N. N. 1958. [New genera and species of foraminiferans.] Trudy Vsesoyuznogo Neftyanogo Nauchno-Issledovatel'skogo Geologorazvedochnogo Instituta (VNIGRI), Mikrofauna SSSR Sbornik 9, publication 115, 5–81 [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Conil, R., Longerstaey, P. J. & Ramsbottom, W. H. C. 1980. Matériaux pour l'étude micropaléontologique du Dinantien de Grande–Bretagne. Mémoires de l'Institut de Géologie de l'Université de Louvain 30, 1–187.Google Scholar
Conil, R., Groessens, E., Laloux, M., Poty, E. & Tourneur, F. 1991. Carboniferous guide foraminifera, corals and conodonts in the Franco–Belgian and Campine basins. Their potential for widespread correlation. Courier Forschungs–Institut Senckenberg 130, 15–30.Google Scholar
Cózar, P., Somerville, I. D. & Burgess, I. 2008a. New foraminifers in the Viséan/Serpukhovian boundary interval of the Lower Limestone Formation, Midland Valley, Scotland. Journal of Paleontology 82(5), 906–23.Google Scholar
Cózar, P., Vachard, D., Somerville, I. D., Berkhli, M., Medina-Varea, P., Rodríguez, S. & Said, I. 2008b. Late Viséan–Serpukhovian foraminiferans and calcareous algae from the Adarouch region (central Morocco), North Africa. Geological Journal 43, 463–85.Google Scholar
Cózar, P., Somerville, I. D. & Burgess, I. 2010. Foraminiferal, calcareous algal and problematica assemblages from the Mississippian Lower Limestone Formation in the Midland Valley, Scotland. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 100 (for 2009), 297–309.Google Scholar
Cózar, P., Said, I., Somerville, I. D., Vachard, D., Medina-Varea, P., Rodríguez, S. & Berkhli, M. 2011. Potential foraminiferal markers for the Viséan–Serpukhovian and Serpukhovian–Bashkirian boundaries – A case-study from Central Morocco. Journal of Paleontology 85 (6), 1105–27.Google Scholar
Cózar, P. & Somerville, I. D. 2004. New algal and foraminiferal assemblages and evidence for recognition of the Asbian–Brigantian boundary in northern England. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 55, 43–65.Google Scholar
Cózar, P. & Somerville, I. D. 2005a. Late Viséan calcareous algal assemblages in South-eastern Ireland. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatschefte 2005, 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cózar, P. & Somerville, I. D. 2005b. Significance of calcareous algae for the recognition of the Asbian and Brigantian Stages (Mississippian) in Ireland and Great Britain. Revista Española de Micropaleontología 37, 71–94.Google Scholar
Cózar, P. & Somerville, I. D. 2006. Significance of the Bradyinidae and Parajanischewskina n. gen. for biostratigraphic correlations in the late Viséan (Mississippian) in western Paleotethyan basins. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 36, 262–72.Google Scholar
Cózar, P. & Somerville, I. D. 2012. Mississippian Biseriamminaceae and their evolutionary development. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 42 (3), 216–33.Google Scholar
Cummings, R. H. 1956. Revision of the Upper Paleozoic Textulariid foraminifera. Micropaleontology 2 (3), 201–42.Google Scholar
Cummings, R. H. 1961. The foraminiferal zones of the Carboniferous sequence of the Archerbeck borehole, Canonbie, Dumfriesshire. Bulletin of the Great Britain Geological Survey 18 (8), 107–28.Google Scholar
Dean, M. T., Browne, M. A. E., Waters, C. N. & Powell, J. H. 2011. A lithostratigraphical framework for the Carboniferous successions of northern Great Britain (onshore). British Geological Survey, Research Report RR/10/07, 1–165.Google Scholar
Devuyst, F. X. & Kalvoda, J. 2007. Early evolution of the genus Eoparastaffella (Foraminifera) in Eurasia: the “interiecta group” and related forms, late Tournaisian to Early Viséan (Mississippian). Journal of Foraminiferal Research 37 (1), 69–89.Google Scholar
Fewtrell, M. D., Ramsbottom, W. H. C. & Strank, A. R. E. 1981. Carboniferous. In Jenkins, D. G. & Murray, J. W. (eds) Stratigraphical Atlas of Fossil Foraminifera (2nd edn), 15–69. British Micropalaeontological Society Series. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
Ganelina, R. A. 1956. [Family Miliolidae d'Orbigny, 1839, Genus Eosigmoilina]. In Kiparisova, L. D., Markovsky, B. P. & Radchenko, G. P. (eds) [Materials for Paleontology, New families and genera] Vsesoyuznyi Nauchno-Issledovatel'skii Geologicheskii Institut (VSEGEI), Novaya Seriya, Paleontologiya 12, 17–19. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
George, T., Johnson, G. A. L., Mitchell, M., Prentice, J. E., Ramsbottom, W. H. C., Sevastopulo, G. D. & Wilson, R. B. 1976. A correlation of the Dinantian rocks in the British Isles. Special Report of the Geological Society, London 7, 1–87.Google Scholar
Holliday, D., Burgess, I. C. & Frost, D. V. 1975. A recorrelation of the Yoredale Limestones (Upper Viséan) of the Alston Block with those of the Northumberland Trough. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 40, 319–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G. A. L. & Nudds, J. R. 1996. Carboniferous biostratigraphy of the Rookhope Borehole, Co. Durham. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 86 (for 1995), 181–226.Google Scholar
Jones, G. Ll. & Somerville, I. D. 1996. Irish Dinantian biostratigraphy: practical applications. In Strogen, P., Somerville, I. D. & Jones, G. Ll. (eds) Recent Advances in Lower Carboniferous Geology. Geological Society, London, Special Publication 107, 371–85.Google Scholar
Kulagina, E. I., Gibshman, N. B. & Pazukhin, V. N. 2003. Foraminiferal zonal standard for Lower Carboniferous of Russia and its correlation with conodont zonation. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 109 (2), 173–85.Google Scholar
Lipina, O. A. & Reitlinger, E. A. 1971. Stratigraphie zonale et paléozoogéographie du Carbonifère Inférieur d'après les foraminifères. Comptes Rendus du 6me Congrès International de Stratigraphie du Carbonifère, Sheffield 1967 3, 1101–12.Google Scholar
Lumsden, G. I. & Wilson, R. B. 1961. The stratigraphy of the Archerbeck Borehole, Canonbie, Dumfriesshire. Bulletin of the Great Britain Geological Survey 18 (8), 1–106.Google Scholar
Lys, M. 1985. North Africa – Foraminifera. In Wagner, R. H.Winkler Prins, C. F. & Granados, L. F. (eds) The Carboniferous of the world II: Australia, Indian subcontinent, South Africa, South America and North Africa. IUGS Publication 20, 354–64. Madrid: Instituto Geológico y Minero de España/Empresa Nacional Adaro de Investigaciones Mineras, S.A.Google Scholar
Mamet, B. L. 1977. Foraminiferal zonation of the Lower Carboniferous methods and stratigraphic implication. In Kauffmann, E. G. & Hazel, J. E. (eds) Concepts and Methods in Biostratigraphy, 445–62. Stroudsburg: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.Google Scholar
Miklukho-Maklay, A. D. 1960. [New Early Carboniferous Archaediscidae]. In Markovsky, B. P. (ed.) [New species of ancient plants and invertebrates of the USSR, First Part], 149–51. Moscow: Vsesoyuznyi Nauchno-Issledovatel'skii Geologicheskii Institut (VSEGEI). [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Poletaev, I., Brazhnikova, N. E., Vasilyuk, N. P. & Vdovenko, M. V. 1991. Local zones and major Lower Carboniferous biostratigraphic boundaries of the Donets Basin (Donbass). Courier Forschungs-institut Senckenberg 130, 47–50.Google Scholar
Poty, E., Devuyst, F.-X. & Hance, L. 2006. Upper Devonian and Mississippian foraminiferal and rugose coral zonations of Belgium and northern France: a tool for Eurasian correlations. Geological Magazine 143, 829–57.Google Scholar
Ramsbottom, W. H. C., Calver, M. A., Eagar, R. M. C., Hodson, F., Holliday, D. W., Stubblefield, C. J. & Wilson, R. B. 1978. A correlation of Silesian rocks in the British Isles. Special Report of the Geological Society, London 10, 1–82.Google Scholar
Somerville, I. D. & Cózar, P. 2005. Late Asbian to Brigantian (Mississippian) foraminifera from south–east Ireland: Comparison with Northern England assemblages. Journal of Micropalaeontology 24, 131–142.Google Scholar
Stepanov, D. L. & Donakova, L. M. 1982. General Stratigraphic Scale of the Carboniferous. In Sokolov, B. S. (ed.) Resolutions of Interdepartmental Stratigraphic Committee and its permanent commissions 20, 30–31.Google Scholar
Strank, A. R. E. 1981. Foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Holkerian, Asbian and Brigantian stages of the British Lower Carboniferous. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Vachard, D. & Cózar, P. 2010. An attempt of classification of the Palaeozoic incertae sedis Algospongia. Revista Española de Micropaleontología 42 (2), 129–241.Google Scholar
Vaughan, A. 1905. The palaeontological sequence in the Carboniferous Limestone of the Bristol area. Quarterly Journal of Geological Society, London 61, 181–307.Google Scholar
Vdovenko, M. V. 2001. Atlas of foraminifera from the Upper Viséan and Lower Serpukhovian (Lower Carboniferous) of the Donets Basin (Ukraine). Abhandlungen und Berichte für Naturkunde 23, 93–178.Google Scholar
Waters, C. N., Dean, M. T., Jones, N. S. & Somerville, I. D. 2011a. Northumberland Trough and Solway Basin. In Waters, C. N., Somerville, I. D., Jones, N. S., Cleal, C. J., Collinson, J. D., Waters, R. A., Besly, B. M., Dean, M. T., Stephenson, M. H., Davies, J. R., Freshney, E. C., Jackson, D. I., Mitchell, W. I., Powell, J. H., Barclay, W. J., Browne, M. A. E., Leveridge, B. E., Long, S. L. & McLean, D. (eds) A revised correlation of Carboniferous rocks in the British Isles. The Geological Society, London, Special Report 26, 89–95.Google Scholar
Waters, C. N., Somerville, I. D., Jones, N. S., Cleal, C. J., Collinson, J. D., Waters, R. A., Besly, B. M., Dean, M. T., Stephenson, M. H., Davies, J. R., Freshney, E. C., Jackson, D. I., Mitchell, W. I., Powell, J. H., Barclay, W. J., Browne, M. A. E., Leveridge, B. E., Long, S. L. & McLean, D. 2011b. A revised correlation of Carboniferous rocks in the British Isles. The Geological Society, London, Special Report 26, 186pp.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Somerville Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Somerville Supplementary Material(File)
File 130 KB
Supplementary material: File

Somerville Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Somerville Supplementary Material(File)
File 165.9 KB