Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:06:33.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coprolites from the Viséan of East Kirkton, West Lothian, Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

Daphne Sumner
Daphne Sumner
Affiliation:
Department of Geography and Geology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9ST, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Coprolites are most common in the transition zone between the East Kirkton Limestone and the Little Cliff Shale. One hundred and twenty five samples are classified in five groups on the basis of size and shape. Within these groups distinctive subgroups are described. Many of the coprolites are believed to have been produced by fish, but some could have been produced by eurypterids and aquatic tetrapods.

Keywords

CarboniferouseurypteridfishWest Lothian Oil-Shale Formationtetrapodvalvular intestineEast KirktonScotland
Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 84 , Issue 3-4: Volcanism and early terrestrial biotas , 1993 , pp. 413 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buckland, W. 1836. Geology and mineralogy considered with reference to natural theology. London: William Pickering.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clack, J. A. 1994. Silvanerpeton miripedes, a new anthracosauroid from the Viséan of East Kirkton, West Lothian, Scotland. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH: EARTH SCI 84, 369–376.Google Scholar
Coates, M. I. 1994. Actinopterygian and acanthodian fishes from the Viséan of East Kirkton, West Lothian, Scotland. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH: EARTH SCI 84, 317–327.Google Scholar
Dean, B. 1903. Obituary notice of a lung-fish. POP SCI MONTH 63, 33–9.Google Scholar
Elder, R. L. 1985. Principles of aquatic taphonomy with examples from the fossil record. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Hibbert, S. 1835. On the fresh-water limestone of Burdiehouse in the neighbourhood of Edinburgh, belonging to the Carboniferous group of rocks. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH 13, 169–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeram, A. J. & Selden, P. A. 1994. Eurypterids from the Viséan of East Kirkton, West Lothian, Scotland. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH: EARTH SCI 84, 301–308.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. H. 1934. A coprolite horizon from the Pennsylvanian of Chaffee and Park Counties, Colorado. J PALEONTOL 8, 626–31.Google Scholar
McAllister, J. A. 1985. Reevaluation of the formation of spiral coprolites. UNIV KANSAS PALEONTOL CONTR PAP 114, 1–12.Google Scholar
Milner, A. R. 1982. Small temnospondyl amphibians from the Middle Pennsylvanian of Illinois. PALAEONTOL 25, 635–44.Google Scholar
Ochev, V. G. 1974. Some remarks on coprolites of Triassic vertebrates. PALEONTOL J 8, 253–5.Google Scholar
Paterson, R. 1837. On the fossil organic remains found in the Coal Formation at Wardie near Newhaven. EDINBURGH N PHILOS J 23, 146–55.Google Scholar
Paton, R. L. 1994. Elasmobranch fishes from the Viséan of East Kirkton, West Lothian, Scotland. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH: EARTH SCI 84, 329–330.Google Scholar
Pollard, J. E. 1990. Evidence for Diet. In Briggs, D. E. G. & Crowther, P. R. (Eds) Palaeobiology, a synthesis. Oxford: Black well Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Price, P. H. 1927. The coprolite horizon of the Conemaugh Series in and around Morgantown, West Virginia. ANN CARNEGIE MUS 17, 211–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolfe, W. D. I., Durant, G. P., Baird, W. J., Chaplin, C., Paton, R. L. & Reekie, R. J. 1994. The East Kirkton Limestone, Viséan, of West Lothian, Scotland: introduction and stratigraphy. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH: EARTH SCI 84, 177–188.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S. & Parsons, T. S. 1986. The vertebrate body. 6th edn. Philadelphia: CBS College Publishing.Google Scholar
Sumner, D. 1991. Palaeobiology taphonomy and diagenesis of a Lower Carboniferous fish fauna. Ph.D. Thesis, University of St. Andrews.Google Scholar
Treasurer, J. W. 1988. Measurement of regurgitation in feeding studies of predatory fishes. J FISH BIOL 33, 267–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterston, C. D., Oelofsen, B. N. & Oosthuizen, R. D. F. 1985. Cyrtoctenus wittebergensis sp. nov. (Chelicerata: Eurypterida) a large sweep-feeder from the Carboniferous of South Africa. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH 76, 339–58.Google Scholar
Williams, M. E. 1972. The origin of ‘spiral coprolites’. UNIV KANSAS PALEONTOL CONTR PAP 59, 1–19.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R. & Richardson, E. S. 1963. The paleoecological history of two Pennsylvanian black shales. FIELDIANA GEOL MEM 4, 1–239.Google Scholar
Zidek, J. 1980. Acanthodes lundi, new species (Acanthodii) and associated coprolites from the uppermost Mississippian Heath Formation of central Montana. ANN CARNEGIE MUS 49, 49–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar