Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:05:48.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Functional morphology and affinities of extant Chelicerata in evolutionary perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

L. van der Hammen
L. van der Hammen
Affiliation:
Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Raamsteeg 2, Postbus 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A survey is given of the functional morphology of extant Chelicerata with special reference to segmentation of the body, segmentation and articulation of the legs, coxal glands, mouthparts and ingestion, respiratory organs, sperm transfer, and development. This is followed by a discussion of primitive types, evolution and diversity, the transition from aquatic to terrestrial life, and the affinities of extant chelicerate groups.

Keywords

developmentexcretioningestionlocomotionrespirationsegmentationsperm transfer
Type
Living forms and their bearing on the interpretation of fossils
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 76 , Issue 2-3: Fossil Anthropods as Living Animals , 1985 , pp. 137 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberti, G. 1979. Zur Feinstruktur der Spermien und Spermiocytogenese von Prokoenenia wheeleri (Rucker, 1901) (Palpigradi, Arachnida). ZOOMORPHOLOGIE 94, 111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberti, G. 1980a. Zur Feinstruktur der Spermien und Spermiocytogenese der Milben (Acari) I. Anactinotrichida. ZOOL JAHRB ANAT 104, 77–138.Google Scholar
Alberti, G. 1980b. Zur Feinstruktur der Spermien und Spermiocytogenese der Milben (Acari) II. Actinotrichida. ZOOL JAHRB ANAT 104, 144–203.Google Scholar
Alberti, G. 1980c. Zur Feinstruktur des Hodenepithels und der Spermien von Eusimonia mirabilis Roewer 1934 (Solifugae, Arachnida). ZOOL ANZ 204, 345–52.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. T. 1973. Embryology and phytogeny in Annelids and Arthropods. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Baccetti, B. 1979. Ultrastructure of sperm and its bearing on Arthropod phylogeny. In Gupta, A. P. (ed.) Arthropod Phytogeny, 604–44. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Bonik, K., Grasshoff, M. & Gutmann, W. F. 1977. Die Evolution der Tierkonstruktionen VI. Von der segmentalen Wurmhydraulik zum Aussenskelett-Muskelsystem der Gliederfüsser. NAT MUS 107, 131–40.Google Scholar
Buxton, B. H. 1917. Notes on the anatomy of Arachnids. Part I: The coxal glands of the Arachnids. Part II: The ganglia of the Arachnids. J MORPHOL 29, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudonneret, J. 1964. Une unité structurale: le métamère. CAH ETUD BIOL 13-15, 77–101.Google Scholar
Coineau, Y., Fize, A. & Delamare Deboutteville, C. 1967. Decouverte en France des Acariens Nematalycidae Strenzke à l'occasion des travaux d'aménagement du Languedoc-Roussillon. C R HEBD SEANCES ACAD SCI PARIS 265D, 685–8.Google Scholar
Firstman, B. 1973. The relationship of the chelicerate arterial system to the evolution of the endosternite. J ARACHNOL 1, 1–54.Google Scholar
Grasshoff, M. 1978. A model of the evolution of the main chelicerate groups. SYMP ZOOL SOC LONDON 42, 273–84.Google Scholar
Hammen, L. van der 1977a. A new classification of Chelicerata. ZOOL MEDED LEIDEN 51, 307–19.Google Scholar
Hammen, L. van der 1977b. The evolution of the coxa in mites and other groups of Chelicerata. ACAROLOGIA 19, 12–9.Google Scholar
Hammen, L. van der 1978. The evolution of the chelicerate life-cycle. ACTA BIOTHEOR 27, 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammen, L. van der 1979. Comparative studies in Chelicerata I. The Cryptognomae (Ricinulei, Architarbi and Anactinotrichida). ZOOL VERH LEIDEN 174, 1–62.Google Scholar
Hammen, L. van der 1980. Glossary of acarological terminology (Glossaire de la terminologie acarologique), vol. 1 General terminology. The Hague: Dr W. Junk.Google Scholar
Hammen, L. van der 1981. Type-concept, higher classification and evolution. ACTA BIOTHEOR 30, 3–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammen, L. van der 1982. Comparative studies in Chelicerata II. Epimerata (Palpigradi and Actinotrichida). ZOOL VERH LEIDEN 196, 1–70.Google Scholar
Manton, S. M. 1977. The Arthropoda. Habits, functional morphology, and evolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Monniot, F. 1966. Un Palpigrade interstitiel: Leptokoenenia scurra n. sp. REV ECOL BIOL SOL 3, 41–64.Google Scholar
Moritz, M. 1959. Zur Embryonalentwicklung der Phalangiiden (Opiliones; Palpatores) II. Die Anlage und Entwicklung der Coxaldrüse bei Phalangium opilio L. ZOOL JAHRB ANAT 77, 229–40.Google Scholar
Savory, T. H. 1977. Arachnida. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schaller, F. 1965. Mating behaviour of lower terrestrial arthropods from the phylogenetic point of view. PROC 12TH INT CONGR ENTOMOL LONDON 1964, 297–8.Google Scholar
Schaller, F. 1911. Indirect sperm transfer by sou arthopods. ANNVJ REV ENTOMOL 16, 407–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaller, F. 1979. Significance of sperm transfer and formation of spermatophores in Arthropod phylogeny. In Gupta, A. P. (ed.) Arthropod Phylogeny, 587–608. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Selden, P. A. 1981. Functional morphology of the prosoma of Baltoeurypterus tetragonophthalmus (Fischer) (Chelicerata: Eurypterida). TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH EARTH SCI 72, 9–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selden, P. A. 1983. The fossil Ricinuleids. 9TH INT ARACHNOL CONGR PANAMA 1983 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Størmer, L. 1976. Arthropods from the Lower Devonian (Lower Emsian) of Alken an der Mosel, Germany. Part 5: Myriapoda and additional forms, with general remarks on fauna and problems regarding invasion of land by arthropods. SENCKENBERGIANA LETHAEA 57, 87–183.Google Scholar
Vachon, M. 1945. L'appendice arachnidien et son évolution. Note préliminaire. BULL SOC ZOOL FR 69, 172–7.Google Scholar
Weygoldt, P. 1980. Towards a cladistic classification of the Chelicerata. PROC 8TH INT ARACHNOL CONGR VIENNA 1980, 331–4.Google Scholar
Weygoldt, P. & Paulus, H. F. 1979a. Untersuchungen zur Morphologie, Taxonomie und Phylogenie der Chelicerata I. Morphologische Untersuchungen. Z ZOOL SYST EVOLUTIONSFORSCH 17, 85–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weygoldt, P. & Paulus, H. F. 1979b. Untersuchungen zur Morphologie, Taxonomie und Phylogenie der Chelicerata II. Cladogramme und die Entfaltung der Chelicerata. Z ZOOL SYST EVOLUTIONSFORSCH 17, 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar