Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:05:56.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrodynamics of magmatic and meteoric fluids in the vicinity of granitic intrusions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

R. Brooks Hanson
Affiliation:
R. Brooks Hanson, Science, 1200 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20005,U.S.A. E-mail: bhanson@aaas.org.

Abstract:

Numerical models that account for fluid flow, magmatic and metamorphic fluid production, topography and thermal expansion of the fluid following emplacement of a granitic magma in the upper crust reveal controls on the distribution of magmatic fluids during the evolution of a hydrothermal system. Initially, fluid pressures are close to lithostatic in and near an intrusion, and internally generated magmatic and metamorphic fluids are expelled. Later, fluid pressures drop to hydrostatic values and meteoric fluids circulate throughout the system. High permeabilities and low rates of fluid production accelerate this transition. Fluid production in the magma and wallrocks is the dominant mechanism elevating fluid pressures to lithostatic values. For granitic intrusions, about three to five times as much magmatic fluid is produced as metamorphic fluid. Continuous fluid release from a granitic magma with a vertical dimensions of 10 km produces a dynamic permeability of up to several tens of microdarcies.

Near the surface, topography associated with a typical volcano acts to maintain a shallow meteoric flow system and drive fluids laterally. The exponential decay with depth of the influence of topography on fluid pressures results in a persistent zone of mixing at a depth of 1-2 km between these meteoric fluids and magmatic fluids despite variations in the strength of the magmatic hydrothermal system. However, in shallow systems where fluid release is episodic, dramatic changes in the region of mixing are still possible because fluid pressure is sensitive to variations in the rates of fluid production. At depth, high rates of metamorphic fluid production in the wallrocks and low permeabilities (< 1 μD) produce elevated fluid pressures, which hinder the lateral flow of magmatic fluids. Together, these patterns are consistent with the distribution and evolution of skarns and hydrothermal ore deposits around granitic magmas.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barton, M. D., Staude, J.-M., Snow, E. A.&Johnson, D. A. 1991. Aureole systematics. In Kerrick, D. M. (ed.) Contact Metamorphism. MINERAL SOC AM REV MINERAL 26, 723847.Google Scholar
Birch, M. U. 1989. Groundwater flow systems and thermal regimes near cooling igneous plutons: influence of surface topography. M.S. Thesis. Utah State University, Logan.Google Scholar
Burnham, C. W. 1979. Magmas and hydrothermal fluids. In Barnes, H. L. (ed.) Geochemistry of hydrothermal ore deposits, 2nd edn, 71136. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Candela, A. 1991. Physics of aqueous phase evolution in plutonic environments. AM MINERAL 76, 1081–91.Google Scholar
Cathles, L. M. 1981. Fluid flow and genesis of hydrothermal ore deposits. ECON GEOL 75th ANNIV VOL 424–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, S. J.&Bowman, J. R. 1994. Contact metamorphism surrounding the Alta stock: thermal constraints and evidence of advective heat transport from calcite + dolomite geothermometry. AM MINERAL 79, 513–25.Google Scholar
Fehn, U., Cathles, L. M.&Holland, H. D. 1978. Hydrothermal convection and uranium deposits in abnormally radioactive plutons. ECON GEOL 73, 1556–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, C.&Smith, L. 1990. Fluid flow in tectonic regimes. In Nesbitt, B. E. (ed.) Crustal fluids. MINERAL ASSOC CAN SHORT COURSE HANDB 18, 147.Google Scholar
Furlong, K. P., Hanson, R. B.&Bowers, J. R. 1991. Modeling thermal regimes. In Kerrick, D. M. (ed.) Contact metamorphism. MINERAL SOC AM REV MINERAL 26, 437506.Google Scholar
Gaetani, G. A., Grove, T. L.&Bryan, W. B. 1993. The influence of water on the petrogenesis of subduction-related igneous rocks. NATURE 365, 332–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, R. B. 1992. Effects of fluid production on fluid flow during regional and contact metamorphism. J METAMORPH GEOL 10, 8797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, R. B. 1995. The hydrodynamics of contact metamorphism. GEOL SOC AM BULL 107, 595611.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, R. B.&Barton, M. D. 1989. Thermal development of low-pressure metamorphic belts: results from two-dimensional numerical models. J GEOPHYS RES 94, 10,363–77.Google Scholar
Hedenquist, J. W.&Lowenstern, J. B. 1994. The role of magmas in the formation of hydrothermal ore deposits. NATURE 370, 519–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henley, R. W.&McNabb, A. 1978. Magmatic vapor plumes and ground water interaction in porphyry copper emplacement. ECON GEOL 74, 1600–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingebritsen, S. E.&Hayba, D. O. 1994. Fluid flow and heat transport near the critical point of H2O. GEOPHYS RES LETT 21, 2199–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. W.&Norton, D. 1985. Theoretical prediction of hydrothermal conditions and chemical equilibria during skarn formation in porphyry copper systems. ECON GEOL 80, 1797–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. C, Anderson, A. T. Jr&Rutherford, M. J. 1994. Preeuptive volatile contents of magmas. In Carroll, M. R.&Holloway, J. R. (eds) Volatiles in Magmas. MINERAL SOC AM REV MINERAL 30, 281330.Google Scholar
Lowell, R. P. 1991. Modeling continental and submarine hydrothermal systems. REV GEOPHYS 29, 457–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nabelek, P. I.&Labotka, T. C. 1993. Implication of geochemical fronts in the Notch Peak contact-metamorphic aureole, Utah, USA. EARTH PLANET SCI LETT 119, 539–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, D. L. 1982. Fluid and heat transport phenomena typical of copper-bearing pluton environments. In Titley, S. R. (ed.) Geology of the porphyry copper deposits, southwestern North America, 5972. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Norton, D.&Cathles, L. M. 1979. Thermal aspects of ore deposition. In Barnes, H. L. (ed.) Geochemistry of hydrothermal ore deposits, vol. 2, 611–31. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Norton, D.&Knapp, J. 1977. Transport phenomena in hydrothermal systems. The nature of porosity. AM J SCI 277, 913–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, D.&Knight, J. 1977. Transport phenomena in hydrothermal systems. Cooling plutons. AM J SCI 277, 937–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmentier, E. M.&Schedl, A. 1981. Thermal aureoles of igneous intrusions: some possible indications of hydrothermal convective cooling. J GEOL 89, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podladchikov, Y. Y.&Wickham, S. M. 1994. Crystallization of hydrous magmas: calculation of associated thermal effects, volatile fluxes, and isotopic alteration. J GEOL 102, 2545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sammel, E. A., Ingebritsen, S. E.&Mariner, R. H. 1988. The hydrothermal system at Newberry Volcano, Oregon. J GEOPHYS RES 93, 10,149–62.Google Scholar
Symonds, R. B., Rose, W. I., Bluth, G. J. S.&Gerlach, T. M. 1994. Volcanic-gas studies: methods, results, and applications. In Carroll, M. R.&Holloway, J. R. (eds) Volatiles in magmas. MINERAL SOC AM 30, 166.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. P. Jr 1990. Oxygen and hydrogen isotope constraints on the deep circulation of surface waters into zones of hydrothermal metamorphism and melting. In Bredehoeft, J. D.&Norton, D. L. (eds) The role of fluids in crustal processes, 7295. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Villas, R. N.&Norton, D. 1977. Irreversible mass transfer between circulating hydrothermal fluids and the Mayflower stock. ECON GEOL 72, 1471–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar