Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:41:13.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I.—Glaucophane-schist, Eclogite, and Associated Rocks from Knockormal in the Girvan-Ballantrae Complex, South Ayrshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

T. W. Bloxam  and
J. B. Allen
T. W. Bloxam
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University College, Swansea
J. B. Allen
Affiliation:
Mineral Resources Division, Overseas Geological Surveys, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Glaucophane-Schists and eclogite are associated with ultrabasic rocks, basic intrusions and Ordovician spilitic lavas at Knockormal in the Girvan-Ballantrae complex, South Ayrshire. Detailed mineralogical and chemical data are presented which indicate that the various glaucophane and blue-amphibole rocks have been derived from spilitic lavas. In addition to glaucophane a blue-amphibole related to crossite is also described. While there is no evidence for an introduction of soda, the deformation attending the glaucophanitic metamorphism was accompanied by chemical changes which appear to have occurred at high water-vapour pressures. There is no evidence of any relationship between the eclogite and adjacent glaucophane-rocks. The eclogite, which is highly aluminous, is interbanded with wehrlite, pyroxenite and serpentinite, and represents a particular phase in the crystallization of these ultrabasic rocks.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 64 , Issue 1: 1958-1959 Glaucophane-Schist, Eclogite, and Associated Rocks from Knockormal in the Girvan-Ballantrae Complex, South Ayrshire , 1960 , pp. 1 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Alderman, A. R., 1936. “Eclogites in the Neighbourhood of Glenelg, Inverness-shire”, Quart. J. Geol. Soc. Lond., 92, 488–530.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. G. C., 1936. “Age of the Girvan-Ballantrae Serpentine”, Geol. Mag., 73, 535–545.Google Scholar
Bailey, E. B., and McCallien, W. J., 1952. “Ballantrae Problems: Historical Review”, Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc., 15, 14–38.Google Scholar
Bailey, E. B., and McCallien, W. J., 1954. “External Metasomatism Associated with Serpentine”, Nature, Lond., 174, 836.Google Scholar
Bailey, E. B., and McCallien, W. J., 1957. “The Ballantrae Serpentine, Ayrshire”, Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc., 17, 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balsillie, D., 1932. “The Ballantrae Igneous Complex, South Ayrshire”, Geol. Mag., 69, 107–131.Google Scholar
Balsillie, D., 1937. “Further Observations on the Ballantrae Igneous Complex, South Ayrshire”, Geol. Mag., 74, 20–33.Google Scholar
Beveridge, R., 1950. “The Igneous Rocks of Arenig Age in the Girvan-Ballantrae District, Ayrshire”, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Library of the University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Bloxam, T. W., 1954. “Rodingite from the Girvan-Ballantrae Complex, Ayrshire”, Miner. Mag., 30, 525–528.Google Scholar
Bloxam, T. W., 1955. “The Origin of the Girvan-Ballantrae Beerbachites”, Geol. Mag., 92, 329–337.Google Scholar
Bloxam, T. W., 1956. “Jadeite-Bearing Metagraywackes in California”, Amer. Min., 41, 488–496.Google Scholar
Bloxam, T. W., 1958. “Pumpellyite from South Ayrshire”, Miner. Mag., 31, 811–813.Google Scholar
Bloxam, T. W., 1959. “Glaucophane-Schists and Associated Rocks Near Valley Ford, California”, Amer. J. Sci., 257, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chelius, C., 1892. “Das Granitmassiv des Melibocus und seine Ganggesteine”, Geol. Landesanstalt Darmstadt, IV Folge, 13, 1–13.Google Scholar
Davidson, C. F., 1943. “The Archæan Rocks of the Rodil District, South Harris, Outer Hebrides”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 61, 71–112.Google Scholar
Deer, W. A., 1938. “The Composition and Paragenesis of the Hornblendes of the Glen Tilt Complex, Perthshire”, Miner. Mag., 25, 56–74.Google Scholar
Duparc, L., 1927. “Sur une Amphibole du Groupe de la Glaucophane”, C. R. Soc. Phys. Hist. Nat. Genève, 44, 48–49.Google Scholar
Ervin, G., and Osborn, E. F., 1951. “The System A12O3-H2O”, J. Geol, 59, 381–394.Google Scholar
Eskola, P., 1920. “The Mineral Facies of Rocks”, Norsk. Geol. Tiddsskr., 6, 143–194.Google Scholar
Eskola, P., 1921. “On the Eclogites of Norway”, Skr. Vidensk. Selsk., Christ., 8.Google Scholar
Ford, W. E., 1915. “A Study of the Relations Existing between the Chemical, Optical and other Physical Properties of the Members of the Garnet Group”, Amer. J. Sci., 40, 33–49.Google Scholar
Fyfe, W. S., Turner, F. J., and Verhoogen, J., 1958. “Metamorphic Reactions and Metamorphic Facies”, Mem. Geol. Soc. Amer., 73.Google Scholar
Greenly, E., 1919. “The Geology of Anglesey”, Mem. Geol. Surv. U.K. Google Scholar
Haüy, l'Abbe, 1922. Traité de Mineralogie, IV, Paris.Google Scholar
Holgate, N., 1951. “On Crossite from Anglesey”, Miner. Mag., 29, 792–798.Google Scholar
Jaffe, H. W., 1951. “The Role of Yttrium and other Minor Elements in the Garnet Group”, Amer. Min., 36, 133–155.Google Scholar
Knopf, A., and Lee, D. E., 1957. “Fassaite from near Helena, Montana”, Amer. Min., 42, 73–77.Google Scholar
Kunitz, W., 1930. “Die Isomorphieverhältnisse in der Hornblendegruppe”, Neues Jb. Min. Geol. Paläont, Abt. A., 60, 171–250.Google Scholar
Lacroix, A., 1901. “Sur un Nouveau Groupe de Roches très Basiques”, C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 82, 358–361.Google Scholar
Lacroix, A., 1917. “Les Péridotites des Pyrénées et les Autres Roches Intrusives non-Feldspathiques qui les Accompagnent”, C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 165, 381.Google Scholar
Lapworth, C., 1889. “On the Ballantrae Rocks of the South of Scotland and their Place in the Upland Sequence”, Geol. Mag., 26, 20–24; 59–69.Google Scholar
MacGregor, A. G., 1931. “Scottish Pyroxene-Granulite Hornfelses and Odenwald Beerbachites”, Geol. Mag., 68, 506–521.Google Scholar
Muir, I. D., 1951. “The Clinopyroxenes of the Skaergaard Intrusion, Eastern Greenland”, Miner. Mag., 29, 690–714.Google Scholar
Murgoci, G., 1922. “Sur la Classification des Amphiboles Bleues et de Certaine Hornblendes”, G. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 175, 372.Google Scholar
Pabst, A., 1931. “The Garnets of the Glaucophane-Schists of California”, Amer. Min., 16, 327–333.Google Scholar
Pabst, A., 1955. “Manganese Content of Garnets from the Franciscan Schists”, Amer. Min., 40, 919–923.Google Scholar
Palache, C., 1894. “On a Rock from the Vicinity of Berkeley Containing a New Soda Amphibole”, Bull. Dep. Geol. Univ. Calif., 1, 18.Google Scholar
Peach, B. N., and Horne, J., 1899. “The Silurian Rocks of Britain: Vol. I, Scotland”, Mem. Geol. Surv. U.K. Google Scholar
Poldervaart, A., 1950. “Correlation of Physical Properties and Chemical Composition in Plagioclase, Olivine and Orthopyroxene Series”, Amer. Min., 35, 1067.Google Scholar
Ramberg, H., 1952. “The Origin of Metamorphic and Metasomatic Rocks”, Chicago.Google Scholar
Ransome, F. L., 1894. “The Geology of Angel Island”, Bull. Dep. Geol. Univ. Calif., 1, 193–235.Google Scholar
Segnit, E. R., 1951. “Some Data on Synthetic Aluminous and Other Pyroxenes”, Amer. Min., 36, 235 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Selfridge, G. C., 1936. “An X-ray and Optical Investigation of the Serpentine Minerals”, Amer. Min., 21, 463.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. M., 1953. “The Camouflage Principle and Trace-Element Distribution in Magmatic Minerals”, J. Geol., 61, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. P., 1907. “The Paragenesis of the Minerals in the Glaucophane-Bearing Rocks of California”, Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 45, 183–283.Google Scholar
Sundius, N., 1946. “The Classification of the Hornblendes and the Solid Solution Relations of the Amphibole Group”, Arsb. Sverig. Geol. Unders., 40, No. 4.Google Scholar
Switzer, G., 1945. “Eclogite from the California Glaucophane-Schists”, Amer. J. Sci., 243, 1–16.Google Scholar
Switzer, G., 1950. “Mineralogy of the California Glaucophane-Schists”, Bull. Calif. Dep. Nat. Res. (Div. Mines), 161, 51–76.Google Scholar
Taliaferro, N. L., 1943. “The Franciscan-Knoxville Problem”, Bull. Amer. Ass. Petrol. Geol., 27, 109–219.Google Scholar
Teall, J. J. H., 1888. “British Petrography”. London.Google Scholar
Teall, J. J. H., 1899. Petrographic Notes in: The Silurian Rocks of Britain: Vol. I, Scotland (See: Peach, B. N. and Horne, J.)Google Scholar
Tilley, C. E., 1938. “Aluminous Pyroxenes in Metamorphosed Limestones”, Geol. Mag., 75, 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, C. E., 1947. “The Dunite-Mylonites of St Paul's Rocks (Atlantic)”, Amer. J. Sci., 245, 483.Google Scholar
Tröger, W. E., 1951. “Über den Fassait über die Einteilung der Klinopyroxene”, Neues Jb. Miner. Mh., 132–139.Google Scholar
Turner, F. J., and Verhoogen, J., 1951. “Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology”, New York.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, G. W., 1909. “A New Occurrence of Picrite in the Ballantrae District and its Associated Rocks”, Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasg., 13, 283–290.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, G. W., 1933. “Summer Field-Meeting: Girvan-Ballantrae”, Proc. Geol. Ass., 44, 57–86.Google Scholar
Walton, E. K., 1956. “Two Ordovician Conglomerates in South Ayrshire”, Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasg., 22, 133–156.Google Scholar
Warren, B. E., 1930. “The Crystal Structure and Chemical Composition of the Monoclinic Amphiboles”, Z. Kristallogr., 72, 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willems, H. W. V., 1937. “On the Relation between Optical Properties and the Chemical Composition of Glaueophane”, Proc. Acad. Sci. Amst., 40, 720–724.Google Scholar
Winchell, A. N., and Winchell, H., 1951. “Elements of Optical Mineralogy”, Pt. 2, 4th Ed. New York.Google Scholar
Yoder, H. S., 1950. “The Jadeite Problem”, Amer. J. Sci., 248, 312–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoder, H. S., 1952. “The MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O System and the Related Metamorphic Facies”, Amer. J. Sci., Bowen Volume, 569–627.Google Scholar