Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:51:53.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II.—Observations on Pterygotid Eurypterids*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Charles D. Waterston
Charles D. Waterston
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Royal Scottish Museum.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

With the exception of Pterygotus rhenaniœ Jaekel, for which the new genus Jœkelopterus is proposed, the published accounts of the median abdominal appendages of the Pterygotidæ are inadequate. An examination of the British material was undertaken with a view to improving our knowledge of the opercular anatomy of the family. An account is given of the genital appendages associated with both sexes of Erettopterus bilobus (Salter) and Pterygotus anglicus Agassiz, of the Baltic species Erettopterus osiliensis (Schmidt) and of British forms in which only one type of appendage is known. Attention has been given also to the cheliceræ of the British type species because of the importance which has been attached to this character in classification. The significance of the chelate and genital appendages in the classification and biology of the Pterygotidæ is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , 1964 , pp. 9 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Agassiz, L., 1844. Monographie des poissons fossiles du Vieux Grès Rouge, ou Système Dévonien. Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
Brooks, H. K., 1962. “The Paleozoic Eumalacostraca of North America”, Bull. Amer. Paleont., 44, 163–338.Google Scholar
Brooks, W. K., 1886. “Report on the Stomatopoda collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873-1876”, Rep. Voy. H.M.S. “Challenger”, Zoology, 16, Pt, 45.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M., and Ruedemann, R., 1912. “The Eurypterida of New York“, Mem. N. Y. St. Mus., 14, Pts. 1 and 2.Google Scholar
Depitout, A., 1962. “Étude des Gigantostracés Siluriens du Sahara Central”, Publ. Cent. Rech. Sahariennes, Géol., 2.Google Scholar
Fowler, G. H., 1909. “The Ostracoda. Biscayan Plankton collected during a cruise of H.M.S. Research. 1900. Pt, XII”, Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. Zool., 10, 219–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J., 1859. “Natural History of New York”, Palœontology, 3.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H., and Salter, J. W., 1859. “On the Anatomy and Affinities of the Genus Pterygotus (by Huxley) and Description of new Species of Pterygotus (by Salter)”, Mem. Geol. Surv. U.K., Monogr., 1.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O., 1914. “Ein grosser Pterygotus aus dem rheinischen Unterdevon”, Paläont. Z., 1, 379–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kesling, R. V., 1954. “Ornamentation as a Character in Specific differentiation of Ostracods”, Contr. Mus. Pal. Univ. Mich., 12, 13–21.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N., 1951. “Downtonian (Silurian) Eurypterida from Perton, near Stoke Edith, Herefordshire”, Geol. Mag., 88, 1–24.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N., 1955. “A New Phyllocarid and Eurypterid from the Silurian of Florida”, J. Paleont., 29, 295–297.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N., 1961. “The Silurian Eurypterida of the Welsh Borderland”, J. Paleont., 35, 789–835.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N., 1961 a, “Eurypterids of the Devonian Holland Quarry Shale of Ohio”, Fieldiana, Geol., 14, 79–98.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N., and Caster, K. E., 1955. “The Pterygotidæ of the Silurian Vernon Shales of New York”, J. Paleont., 29, 1041–1047.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N., and Størmer, L., 1952. “A Lower Devonian Pterygotus from Wyoming J. Paleont., 26, 997–998.Google Scholar
Laurie, M., 1893. “The Anatomy and Relations of the Eurypteridæ”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 37, 509–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leutze, W. P., 1958. “Eurypterids from the Silurian Tymochtee Dolomite of Ohio”, J. Paleont., 32, 937–942.Google Scholar
Moore, L. R., 1963. “On some Micro-Organisms associated with the Scorpion Gigantoscorpio willsi Størmer”, Skr. Norske Vidensk Akad. (M. -N. Kl.), 9, 1–14.Google Scholar
Needham, A. E., 1950. “Growth and Regeneration Rates in relation to age in the Crustacea with special reference to the Isopod Asellus aquaticus (Linn.)” J. Geront., 5, 5–16.Google Scholar
Nieszkowski, J., 1859. “Der Eurypterus remipes aus den ober-silurischen Schichten der Insel Oesel”, Archiv. Naturk. Liv-, Ehst- u. Kurl., 2, 299.Google Scholar
Prantl, F., and Pribyl, A., 1948. “Revision of the Bohemian Silurian Eurypterida”, Rozpr. Geol. Ust. Csl., 10.Google Scholar
Przibram, H., 1931. Connecting Laws in Animal Morphology. Univ. London Press.Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R., 1935. “A Review of the Eurypterid Rami of the Genus Pterygotus with Descriptions of two new Devonian Species”, Ann. Carneg. Museum, 24, 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, J. W., 1856. “On some new Crustacea from the Uppermost Silurian Rocks”, Quart. J. Geol. Soc. Lond., 12, 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, J. W., 1859. “On some New Species of Eurypterus; with Notes on the Distribution of the Species”, Quart. J. Geol. Soc. Lond., 15, 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, J. W., 1863. “On some Species of Eurypterus and Allied Forms”, Quart. J. Geol. Soc. Lond., 19, 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarle, C. J., 1903. “A new Eurypterid Fauna from the base of the Salina of Western New York”, Bull N. Y. St. Mus., 69, 1080–1108.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F., 1883. “Die Crustaceenfauna der Eurypterenschichten von Rootzikull auf Oesel”, Mem. Acad. Sci. St. Petersb., 31, 5.Google Scholar
Semper, M., 1898. “Die Gigantostraken des älteren böhmischen Paläozoicum”, Beitr. Paläiont. Geol. Ost. -Ung., 19, 71–88.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G., 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Størmer, L., 1933. “Merostomata from the Downtonian Sandstone of Ringerike, Norway”. Skr. Norske Vidensk Akad. (I. M. -N. Kl.), 10.Google Scholar
Størmer, L., 1936. “Eurypteriden aus dem rheinischen Unterdevon”, Abh. Preuss. Geol. Landesanst., 175.Google Scholar
Størmer, L., 1944. “On the Relationships and Phylogeny of Fossil and Recent Arachnomorpha”, Skr. Norske VidenskAkad., (M. -N. Kl.), 5, 158.Google Scholar
Størmer, L., 1955. “Chelicerata”, Treat. Invert. Paleont. Part P, Arthropoda 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Størmer, L., 1963. “Gigantoscorpio willsi a new Scorpion from the Lower Carboniferous of Scotland and its associated preying Microorganisms”, Skr. Norske VidenskAkad., (M. -N. Kl.), 8.Google Scholar
Waterston, C. D., 1960. “The Median Abdominal Appendage of the Silurian Eurypterid Slimonia acuminata (Salter)”, Palœontology, 3, 245–259.Google Scholar
Woodward, H., 1866–1878. “A Monograph of the British Fossil Crustacea belonging to the order Merostomata”, Palaeontogr. Soc. (Monogr.).Google Scholar