Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:45:20.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IX.—The Structure and Function of the Alimentary Canal of Æolid Molluscs, with a Discussion on their Nematocysts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Alastair Graham
Alastair Graham
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Birkbeck College, University of London.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During recent years there has been a very great advance in our knowledge of the minute structure and function of the various regions and glands of the alimentary canal of the prosobranch and pulmonate gastropods, without any corresponding increase in our understanding of the opisthobranch and, in particular, of the nudibranch gut. That the emphasis should be laid on the streptoneurous and the land-living forms is obviously due to their abundance and to the fact that they include almost all the familiar types of gastropod mollusc, but it is disappointing that, at the moment of writing, there exists only one account of the histology and function of the digestive system of either a dorid or an æolid—to confine attention to the two main types of nudibranch molluscs which occur in British waters—that of Millott (1937b). This is perhaps more noticeable when it is recalled that the nudibranchs have specialised along distinctly unusual lines, many of which are intimately associated with the food and feeding habits which the animals have adopted. The æolids, it is true, have attracted a lively interest in connexion with their possession of nematocysts, but the majority of investigators have apparently been content to trace these into the cnidosacs without concerning themselves over the other constituents of the animal's food.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 59 , Issue 2 , 1938 , pp. 267 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Agersborg, H. P. K., 1923. “The Morphology of the Nudibranchiate Mollusc Melibe (syn. Chioraera) leonina (Gould),” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., vol. lxvii, p. 507.Google Scholar
Alder, J., and Hancock, A., 1846. A Monograph of the British Nudibranchiate Mollusca. London, The Ray Society.Google Scholar
Bergh, R., 1874–1888. “Beiträge zui Kenntniss der Aeolidiaden: I–IX,” Verh. zool.-bot. Ges., Wien.Google Scholar
Bodansky, M., and Rose, W. C., 1922. “The Digestive Enzymes of Cœlenterates,” Amer. Journ. Physiol., vol. lxii, p. 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borradaile, L. A., and Potts, F. A., 1932. The Invertebrata. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bottazzi, F., 1897. “La Pression osmotique du Sang des Animaux marins,” Arch. ital. de Biol., vol. xxviii, p. 61.Google Scholar
Boutan, L., 1898. “Mœurs de l'Eolis papillosa Linné,” Arch. Zool. exp. gén., ser. 3, vol. vi, p. xxxvii.Google Scholar
Boyland, E., 1928. “Chemical Changes in Muscle: Part I,” Biochem. Journ., vol. xxii, p. 236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brüel, L. Von, 1904. “Über die Geschlechts- und Verdauungsorgane von Caliphylla mediterranea Costa: ihr morphologische Wert und ihre physiologische Leistung,” Habilitations-Schrift. Halle.Google Scholar
Crofts, D. R., 1929. “Haliotis,” L.M.B.C. Memoir, Liverpool.Google Scholar
Cuénot, L., 1906. “Les Eolidiens empruntent leurs Nématocystes aux Cœlentérés dont ils se nourissent,” C.R. Soc. Biol. Paris, vol. lxi, p. 241.Google Scholar
Cuénot, L., 1907. “L'Origine des Nématocystes des Eolidiens,” Arch. Zool. exp. gén., ser. 4, vol. vi, p. 73.Google Scholar
Dakin, W. J., 1912. “Buccinum,” L.M.B.C. Memoir, London.Google Scholar
Eliot, C., 1910. A Monograph of the British Nudibranchiate Mollusca. Supplementary Volume. London, Ray Society.Google Scholar
Evans, T. J., 1922. “Calma Glaucoides: A study in adaptation,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., vol. lxvi, p. 439.Google Scholar
Fedele, M., 1926. “Sulle Strutture e Funzione dei Ciechi Epatopancreatici nei molluschi Opistobranchi,” Boll. Soc. Biol. sper., vol. i, p. 1.Google Scholar
Fischer, H., 1892. “Recherches sur la morphologie du Foie des Gastéropodes,” Bull. Sci. France Belg., vol. xxiv (ser. 4, vol. iii), p. 260.Google Scholar
Frenzel, J., 1886. “Mikrographie der Mitteldarmdrüse (Leber) der Mollusken. I. Allgemeine Morphologie und Physiologie des Drüsenepithels,” Acta Acad. Caes. Leopold.-Carol. Germanicae, vol. xlviii, p. 84.Google Scholar
Frenzel, J., 1893. “Mikrographie der Mitteldarmdrüse (Leber) der Mollusken. II. Specielle Morphologie des Drüsenepithels der Lamellibranchiaten, Prosobranchiaten, und Opisthobranchiaten,” ibid., vol. lx, p. 317.Google Scholar
Fretter, V., 1937. “On the Structure and Function of the Alimentary Canal of some Species of Polyplacophora (Mollusca),” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lix, p. 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garstang, W., 1890. “A complete list of the Opisthobranchiate Mollusca found at Plymouth, with further observations on their Morphology, Colours, and Natural History,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Ass., vol. i, p. 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, O. C., 1903. “The Nematocysts of Nudibranch Molluscs,” Johns Hopkins Univ. Circ., vol. xxii, p. 22.Google Scholar
Glaser, O. C., and Sparrow, C. M., 1909. “The Physiology of Nematocysts,” Journ. Exp. Zool., vol. vi, p. 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, A., 1932. “On the Structure and Function of the Alimentary Canal of the Limpet,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lvii, p. 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J., 1922. “The Mechanism of Ciliary Movement,” Proc. Roy. Soc. London, B, vol. xciii, p. 104.Google Scholar
Grosvenor, G. H., 1903. “On the Nematocysts of Eolids,” Proc. Roy. Soc. London, B, vol. lxxii, p. 463.Google Scholar
Haller, B., 1888. “Die Morphologie der Prosobranchier, gesammelt auf einer Erdumsegelung durch die König. italienische Korvette ‘Vettor Pisani,’” Morph. Jahrb., vol. xiv, p. 54.Google Scholar
Hancock, A., and Embleton, D., 1845. “On the Anatomy of Eolis,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. xv, pp. 1 and 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecht, E., 1895. “Contribution à l'Etude des Nudibranches,” Mém. Soc. zool. France, vol. viii, p. 539.Google Scholar
Henneguy, L.-F., 1925. “Contribution à l'Histologie des Nudibranches,” Arch. Anat. micr., vol. xxi, p. 400.Google Scholar
Herdman, W. A., 1890. “On the Structure and Functions of the Cerata or Dorsal Papillæ in some Nudibranchiate Mollusca,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., vol. xxxi, p. 41.Google Scholar
Hirsch, G. C., 1914. “Die Ernährungsbiologie fleischfressender Gastropoden,” Zool. Jahrb. abt. Zool. Physiol., vol. xxxv, p. 357.Google Scholar
Howells, H. H., 1936. “The Anatomy and Histology of the Gut of Cymbulia peronii (Blainville),” Proc. Malacol. Soc. London, vol. xxii, p. 62.Google Scholar
Iwanzoff, N., 1896. “Über den Bau, die Wirkungsweise und die Entwicklung der Nesselkapseln von Coelenteraten,” Anat. Anz., vol. xi, p. 551.Google Scholar
Knudsen, M., 1901. Hydrographical Tables. London, Williams and Norgate; and Copenhagen, G. E. C. Gad.Google Scholar
Krijgsman, B. J., 1925. “Arbeitsrhythmus der Verdauungsdrüsen bei Helix pomatia,” Zeits. vergl. Physiol., vol. ii, p. 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krijgsman, B. J., 1928. “Arbeitsrhythmus der Verdauungsdrüsen bei Helix pomatia. II Teil: Sekretion, Resorption und Phagocytose,” ibid., vol. viii, p. 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labbé, A., 1923. “La genèse des nématocystes chez les Nudibranches,” C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, vol. clxxvi.Google Scholar
Macallum, A. B., 1903. “On the Inorganic Composition of the Medusre, Aurelia flavidula and Cyanea arctica,” Journ. Physiol., vol. xxix, p. 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackintosh, N. A., 1925. “The Crystalline Style in Gastropods,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., vol. lxix, p. 317.Google Scholar
Marine Biological Association, 1931. Plymouth Marine Fauna. Plymouth, M.B.A.Google Scholar
Mendel, L. B., and Bradley, H. C., 1905. “Experimental Studies in the Physiology of the Molluscs—First Paper,” Amer. Journ. Physiol., vol. xiii, p. 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millott, N., 1937 a. “On the Structure and Function of the Wandering Cells in the Wall of the Alimentary Canal of Nudibranchiate Mollusca,” Journ. Exp. Zool., vol. xiv, p. 405.Google Scholar
Millott, N., 1937 b. “On the Morphology of the Alimentary Canal, Process of Feeding, and Physiology of Digestion of the Nudibranch Mollusc Jorunna tomentosa (Cuvier),” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, B, vol. ccxxviii, p. 173.Google Scholar
Naville, A., 1926. “Notes sur les Eolidiens,” Rev. suisse Zool., vol. xxxiii, p. 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, G. E., and Baxter, E. W., 1936. “On the Nature of the free Cell-Border of certain Mid-Gut Epithelia,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., vol. lxxix, p. 123.Google Scholar
Orton, J. H., 1922. “Occurrence of a Crystalline Style in the American Slipper Limpet (Crepidula fornicata) and its allies,” Nature, vol. cx, p. 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantin, C. F. A., 1923. “On the Physiology of Amœboid Movement: I,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Ass., vol. xiii, p. 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. H., and Alstyne, M. A. Van, 1932. “The Control and Discharge of Nematocysts, especially in Metridium and Physalia,” Journ. Exp. Zool., vol. lxiii, p. 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1894. “Recherches sur divers Opisthobranches,” Mém. cour. Acad. Roy. Sci. Belg., vol. liii.Google Scholar
Robson, G. C., 1922. “On the anatomy and affinities of Paludestrina ventrosa, Montague,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., vol. lxvi, p. 159.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S., and Yonge, C. M., 1936. The Seas. London, Warne & Co.Google Scholar
Thiele, J., 1935. Handbuch der systematischen Weichtierkunde, Part 4. Jena, Fischer.Google Scholar
Weill, R., 1934. “Contribution à l'Etude des Cnidaires et de leurs Nématocystes. I. Recherches sur les Nématocystes,” Trav. Sta. Zool. Wimereux, vol. x.Google Scholar
Winckworth, R., 1932. “The British Marine Mollusca,” Journ. Conch., London, vol. xix, p. 211.Google Scholar
Wright, T. S., 1858. “On the Cnidæ or Thread-cells of the Eolidæ,” Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edin., vol. i.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1926. “The Digestive Diverticula in the Lamellibranchia,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. liv, p. 703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1932. “Notes on Feeding and Digestion in Pterocera and Vermetus, with a Discussion on the Occurrence of the Crystalline Style in the Gastropods,” Sci. Rep. Gt. Barrier Reef Exped., Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), vol. i, p. 259.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1935. “‘Symbiosis’ between Invertebrates and unicellular Algæ,” Proc. Linn. Soc. London, pt. 4, p. 90.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1936. “On the Nature and Permeability of Chitin. II. The Permeability of the Uncalcined Chitin Lining the Foregut of Homarus,” Proc. Roy. Soc. London, B, vol. cxx, p. 15.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1937 a. “Evolution and Adaptation in the Digestive System of the Metazoa,” Biol. Rev., vol. xii, p. 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1937 b. “The Biology of Aporrhais pes-pelecani (L.) and A. serresiana (Mich.),” Journ. Mar. Biol. Ass., vol. xxi, p. 687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M., and Nicholls, A. G., 1931. “Studies on the Physiology of Corals. IV. The Structure, Distribution, and Physiology of the Zooxanthellse,” Sci. Rep. Gt. Barrier Reef Exped., Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), vol. i, p. 135.Google Scholar