Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:15:23.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XIII.—A Study of the Hokien and the Tamil Skull

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Gordon Harrower
Gordon Harrower
Affiliation:
Professor of Anatomy, King Edward VII Medical College, Singapore.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Hitherto in matters craniological the student has been confronted with the primary difficulty that the series upon which he intends to work has been unearthed many years after burial. In consequence the question of age, sex, and nationality has remained a matter of doubt. In the present series of Hokien and Tamil skulls this difficulty has been entirely eliminated. As the skulls were collected immediately after death, the age, sex, and nationality of each is known. On removal from the body each skull had a metal tally attached to it, so that no error could arise in the process of preparation. In craniological and craniometrical work one frequently meets with the term “Chinese,” and the author is uncertain of the probable locality from which the skulls were obtained. China covers a vast expanse much larger than most people realise, and its inhabitants include a large variety of branches which vary widely in craniological features. Even in language and religion they differ, and it frequently happens that individuals living 100 miles from one another cannot understand each other's spoken language, although the written characters are identical. In fact the Hokiens call the Northern Chinese “foreigners.” The dissimilarity between the Cantonese Chinese and the Hylam Chinese skull is, I believe, as great as that between the Scottish and the German skull.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , 1926 , pp. 573 - 599
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.SirTurner, Wm., “A Contribution to the Craniology of the People of Scotland,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xl, pt. iii.Google Scholar
SirTurner, WM.Challenger Reports: Zoology, “Human Crania,” pt. xxix, 1884.Google Scholar
SirTurner, WM. “The Craniology, Racial Affinities, and Descent of the Aboriginals of Tasmania,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xlvi, 1908.Google Scholar
2.Klaatsch, Herman, “Memoir on the Skull of an Australian Aboriginal,” Reports from Path. Lab. Lunacy Dept., New South Wales, vol. i, pt. iii, 1908.Google Scholar
Klaatsch, Herman, “Kraniomorphologie und Kraniotrigonometrie,” Arch. f. Anthrop., N.F. 8.Google Scholar
Klaatsch, Herman “Das Gesichtsskelet der Neanderthalrasse und der Australier,” Verhandl. anat. Ges. Berlin, 1908.Google Scholar
3.Schwalbe, G., “Studien uber Pithecanthropus Erectus,” Dubois, Zeitschr. f. Morphol. u. Anthropol., Bd. i, 1899.Google Scholar
Schwalbe, G. “Der Neanderthalschadel,” Bonner Jahrbuch., Heft 106, 1901.Google Scholar
4.Pearson, Karl, “Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution, Regression, Heredity, and Panmixia,” Phil. Trans., vol. clxxxvii A.Google Scholar
Pearson, Karl, “Homogeneity and Heterogeneity in Collections of Crania,” Biometrika, vol. ii.Google Scholar
5.Pearson, K., and Lee, Alice, “Data for the Problem of Evolution in Man,” “A First Study of the Correlation of the Human Skull,” Trans. Roy. Soc., A, vol. cxcvi, 1901.Google Scholar
6.Warren, Ernest, “An Investigation on the Variability of the Human Skeleton, with Especial Reference to the Naquada Race,” Phil. Trans., B, vol. clxxxix.Google Scholar
7.Parsons, F. G., “Report on the Hythe Crania,” Journ. Roy. Anthrop. Inst., vol. xxxviii, 1908.Google Scholar
8.Robertson, A. W., “Craniological Observations on the Lengths, Breadths, and Heights of One Hundred Australian Aboriginal Crania,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxi, pt. i.Google Scholar
9.Berry, R. J. A., and Robertson, A. W., “A Biometric Study of the Relative Degree of Purity of the Race of the Tasmanian, Australian, and Papuan,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxi, pt. i.Google Scholar
Berry, R. J. A., and Robertson, A. W., “Diptographic Tracings in Three Normæ of Ninety Australian Aboriginal Crania,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Vict., vol. vi, 1914.Google Scholar
Berry, R. J. A., and Robertson, A. W., “Diptographic Tracings in Four Normæ of Fifty-two Tasmanian Crania,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Vict., vol. v, pt. i, 1909.Google Scholar
Berry, R. J. A., and Robertson, A. W., The Place in Nature of the Tasmanian Aboriginal as deduced from a Study of his Calvarium,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxi, pt. i, No. 3, and vol. xxiv, pt. ii, 1914.Google Scholar
10.Buchner, L. W. G., “A Study of the Prognathism of the Tasmanian Aboriginal,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., vol. xxv, N.S., pt. i.Google Scholar
Buchner, L. W. G., “A Study of the Curvatures of the Tasmanian Aboriginal Cranium,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxiv, pt. ii, 1914.Google Scholar
Buchner, L. W. G., “An Investigation of Fifty-two Tasmanian Crania by Klaatsch's Kraniotrigonometrical Methods,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., vol. xxv, N.S., pt. i.Google Scholar
11.Macdonnell, W. R., “A Study of the Variation and Correlation of the Human Skull, with Special Reference to English Crania,” Biometrika, vol. iii.Google Scholar
12.Cleland, John, “An Inquiry into the Variations of the Human Skull, particularly in the Antero-posterior Direction,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., vol. clx, 1870.Google Scholar
Cleland, John, “On the Form of the Human Skull at Different Ages and in Different Nationalities,” Memoirs and Memoranda in Anatomy, 1889.Google Scholar
13.Duckworth, W. L. H., “Morphology and Anthropology,” Cambridge, 1904.Google Scholar
14.Schwerz, Franz, “Untersuchungen uber das Verhaltnis von Frontal-Parietal und Occipitalsehne zur Schadel-basislange,” Arch. f. Anthrop., N.F. 9.Google Scholar
15.Fawcett, C. D., and Lee, Alice, “A Second Study of the Variation and Correlation of the Human Skull with Special Reference to the Naquada Crania,” Biometrika, vol. i, p. 408.Google Scholar
16.Boas, Franz, “Heredity in Head Form,” Amer. Anthrop., vol. i.Google Scholar
17.Tschepourkowsky, E., “Contributions to the Study of Inter-racial Correlation,” Biometrika, vol. iv.Google Scholar
18.Schuster, E. H. J., “The Long-Barrow and Round-Barrow Skulls in the Collection of the Department of Comparative Anatomy, The Museum, Oxford,” Biometrika, vol. iv.Google Scholar
19.Thurnam, J., “On the Two Principal Forms of Ancient British and Gaulish Skulls,” Mem. Anthrop. Soc. Lond., vol. i.Google Scholar
20.Falkenburger, F., “Zur Craniotrigonometrie,” Anthrop. Gesellsch., Nos. 7–12, 1912.Google Scholar
21.Cross, K. S., “On a Numerical Determination of the Relative Positions of Certain Biological Types in the Evolutionary Scale, and of the Relative Values of various Cranial Measurements and Indices as Criteria,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxi, pt. i, No. 4.Google Scholar
22.Thomson, A., “A Consideration of some of the More Important Factors concerned in the Production of Man's Cranial Form,” Journ. of Anthrop. Ins. Lond., N.S. 6.Google Scholar
23.Harrower, Gordon, “Variations in the Region of the Foramen Magnum,” Journ. of Anat., vol. lvii, pt. ii, 1923.Google Scholar
24.Thomson, E. Y., “A Study of the Crania of the Moriori,” Biometrika, vol. xi.Google Scholar
25.Bennington, , Dr, “Congo Negroes,” Biometrika, vol. viii.Google Scholar
26.Tyldesley, M. L., “A First Study of the Burmese Skull,” Biometrika, vol. xiii.Google Scholar
27.Morant, G. M., “A First Study of the Tibetan Skull,” Biometrika, vol. xiv.Google Scholar
28.Keane, A. H., “Man: Past and Present,” Cambridge, 1920.Google Scholar
29.Young, M., “A Contribution to the Study of the Scottish Skull,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. li, pt. ii (No. 9), 1916.Google Scholar