Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:14:37.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XIX.—On the Total Intensity of Interfering Light

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2013

Stokes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

[Extracted from a Letter addressed to Professor Kelland.]

My dear Sir,

In reading your paper in the Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, vol. xv., p. 315, some years ago, it occurred to me to try whether it would not be possible to give a general demonstration of the theorem, applying to apertures of all forms. I arrived at a proof, which I wrote out, but have never published. As I think it will interest you I will communicate it. You may make any use you please of it.

Case I. Aperture in front of a lens; light thrown on a screen at the focus, or received through an eye-piece, through which the luminous point is seen in focus.

The expression for the intensity is given in Airy's Tract, Prop. 20. If the intensity of the incident light at the distance of the aperture be taken for unity, and D be the quantity by which any element of the area of the aperture must be divided in forming the expression for the vibration, that expression becomes

the integration being extended over the whole aperture. If it should be necessary to suppose a change of phase to take place in the act of diffraction, such change may be included in the constant B.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , 1853 , pp. 317 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1853

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 319 note * Thus, in the case of the flat prism, if P, Q be the virtual images corresponding to the halves A B, BC, if we produce A B to D, we may suppose the light which falls on B C, instead of coming from Q, to come from P, and to have been accelerated by the passage through the wedge D B C of air instead of the same wedge of glass.