Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:15:24.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XVIII.–The Histology of Disseminated Sclerosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

James W. Dawson
Affiliation:
Neurological Histologist to the Royal College of Physicians' Laboratory; formerly Carnegie Research Fellow.

Extract

The research of which this paper gives an account was originated by the late Dr Alexander Bruce and undertaken in conjunction with him; most of the material used had been accumulated by him during the later years of his life. The following preliminary communication made to the Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland in July 1910 represents in brief outline the position which had been reached at the time of Dr Bruce's lamented death:—

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1916

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature

Arndt, , “Zur pathol. Anat. der Zentralorgane des Nervensystems,” Virchow's Arch., 1875, lxiv, p. 356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alzheimer, , “Ein Beitrag zur path. Anatomie der Epilepsie,” Monats. f. Psych, u. Neurol., 1898, iv, p. 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alzheimer, Beiträge zur Kenntnis der pathologischen Neuroglia,” Histol. u. histopaihol. Arbeiten, Nissl u. Alzheimer, 1910, iii, p. 401.Google Scholar
Balint, , “Beiträge zur Aetiologie und path. Anatomie der multiplen Sklerose,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk, 1900, xvi, p. 437.Google Scholar
Bartels, , “Ueber das Verhalten der Axencylinder bei der multiplen Sklerose,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk., 1903, xxiv, p. 403.Google Scholar
Bartels, , “Zur Frage der Regeneration der Nervenfasern in den Herden der multiplen Sklerose,” Neurol. Centralbl., 1904, xxiii, p. 194.Google Scholar
Batten, , “Two Cases of a Family Disease, the Symptoms of which closely resemble Disseminated Sclerosis,” Proc. of Royal Society of Medicine, 19081909, ii, p. 35.Google Scholar
Bechterew, , “Über die Läsionen der Hirnrinde bei der dissem. Sklerose,” Neurol. Centralbl., 1902, xxi, p. 285.Google Scholar
Beevor, , “The Cerebral Arterial Supply,” Brain, 1907, xxx, p. 403.Google Scholar
Benigni, , “Un caso di sclerosi a placche tardiva a localizzatione spinale,” Riv. Patologia nerv. e mentale, 1908, xiii, p. 15.Google Scholar
Berlin, , “Beitrag zur Lehre von der multiplen Sklerose,” Deuts. Archiv f. klin. Med., 1874, xiv.Google Scholar
Bielschowsky, , “Zur Histologie der multiplen Sklerose,” Neurol. Centralbl., 1903, xxii, p. 770.Google Scholar
Bielschowsky, Die marklösen Nervenfasern in den Herden der multiplen Sklerose,” Neurol. Centralbl., 1904, xxiii, p. 59.Google Scholar
Bikeles, , “Ein Fall von multipler Sklerose, mit subaeutern Verlaufe,” Arb. a. d. neurol. Inst. d. Univ. Wien, 1895, iii, p. 119.Google Scholar
Borst, , “Zur path. Anatomie und Pathogenese der multiplen Sklerose,” Beit. z. path. Anat. u. z. allg. Path., 1897, xxi, p. 308.Google Scholar
Borst, Die multiple Sklerose des Zentralnervensystems,” Ergebnisse der allg. Path. und. path. Anat. (Lubarsch u. Ostertag), 19031904, ix, p. 67.Google Scholar
Bruce, and Dawson, , “On the Relations of the Lymphatics of the Spinal Cord,” Journal of Path, and Bact., 1911, xv, p. 169.Google Scholar
Bramwell, (Byrom, ), “The Relative Frequency of Disseminated Sclerosis,” Rev. of Neurol. and Psychiat, 1903, i, p. 12.Google Scholar
Bramwell, (Byrom, ) “Disseminated Sclerosis with special reference to the Frequency and Etiology of the Disease,” Clinical Studies, April 1, 1904, p, 190.Google Scholar
Bramwell, (Byrom, ) “The Prognosis of Disseminated Sclerosis,” Rev. of Neurol. and Psychiat, 1905, iii, p. 161.Google Scholar
Buzzard, , “Remissions and Relapses in Insular Sclerosis,” Lancet, July 16, 1904, p. 131.Google Scholar
Buzzard, On Certain Acute Infective or Toxic Conditions of the Nervous System,” Brain, 1907, xxx, p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, , “Cerebral Sclerosis,” Brain, 1905, xxviii, p. 367.Google Scholar
Cassirer, , “Über eine besondere Lokalisations- und Verlaufsform der multiplen Sklerose,” Monats. f. Psych. u. Neurol., 1905, xvii, p. 193.Google Scholar
Catolà, , “Sclérose en Plaques,” Nouv. Icon. de la Salpêtrière, 1905, xviii, p. 585.Google Scholar
Catolà, , “Sclérose en Plaques et Syphilis,” Nouv. Icon. de la Salpêtrière, 1906, xix, p. 337.Google Scholar
Besta, Ceni et, “Sclerosi in placche sperimentale da Tossici Aspergilli,” Riv. Sperimentale di Frenatria, 1905, xxxi, p. 125.Google Scholar
Charcot, , Diseases of the Nervous System, New Sydenham Society, 1877, p. 157.Google Scholar
Degenkolb, , “Beiträge zur Pathologie der kleinen Hirngefässe,” Neurol. Centralbl., 1902, xxi, p. 423.Google Scholar
Déjerine, , “Étude sur la Sclérose en Plaques cérébro spinale,” Rev. de Médecine, 1884, iv, p. 193.Google Scholar
Dercum, and Gordon, , “A Case of Multiple Cerebro-spinal Sclerosis,” Amer. Journ. of Med. St., 1905, cxxix, p. 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinkler, , “Zur Kasuistik der multiplen Herdsklerose,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk., 1904, xxvi, p. 233.Google Scholar
Dinkler, , “Über akute myelitis transversa,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk., p. 248.Google Scholar
Erben, , “Zur Histologie und Pathologie der inselformigen Sklerose,” Neurol. Centralbl., 1898, xvii, p. 626.Google Scholar
Evensen, , “Beiträge zu der normalen Anatomie der Hirngefässe,” Histologische und Histopathologische Arbeiten (Nissl), Jena, 1908, ii.Google Scholar
Fieandt, , “Eine neue Methode zur Darstellung des Gliagewebes,” Arch. f. mikr. Anat., 1910, lxxvi, p. 125.Google Scholar
Fieandt, , “Weitere Beiträge zur Frage nach der feineren Struktur des Gliagewebes,” Beitr. z. path. Anat. u. z. allg. Path., 1911, li, p. 247.Google Scholar
Finkelnburg, , “Ueber Myeloencephalitis disseminata und Sclerosis multiplex acuta,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk., 1901, xx, p. 408.Google Scholar
Flatau, and Koelichen, , “Ueber die unter dem Bilde der Myelitis transversa verlaufende multiple Sklerose,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk., 1902, xxii, p. 250.Google Scholar
Flatau, and Koelichen, , “Ueber die multiple Sklerose,” Archiv f. mikr. Anat., 1911, lxxviii, p. 103.Google Scholar
Fleming, , “Optic Neuritis in Cases of Intracranial Tumour,” Rev. of Neurol. and Psych., 1904, ii, p. 569.Google Scholar
Goldmann, , “Investigations on the Central Nervous System by Vital Staining,” abstract by Mott, British Med. Journ., Oct. 4, 1913, p. 871.Google Scholar
Goldscheider, , “Ueber den anat. Process im Anfangsstadium der multiplen Sklerose,” Zeits. f. klin. Medicin, 1896, xxx, p. 417.Google Scholar
Henneberg, , “Ueber ‘funiculare Myelitis,’” Archiv f. Psychiat u. Nervenkrankheiten, 1905, xl, p. 224.Google Scholar
Hoche, , “Die Veränderungen im Rückenmarke nach aseptischer Embolie,” Archiv f. Psychiat u. Nervenkrankheiten, 1899, xxxii, pp. 210, 975.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, , “Die multiple Sklerose des Centralnervensystems,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk., 1902, xxi, p. 1.Google Scholar
Huber, , “Zur path. Anatomie der multiplen Sklerose,” Virchow's Archiv, 1895, cxl, p. 396.Google Scholar
Jelliffe, , “Multiple Sclerosis: Its Etiology,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 1904, xxxi, p. 446.Google Scholar
Knoblauch, , “Ein Fall von multipler Sklerose,” Monats. f. Psych, u. Neurol., 1908, xxiv, p. 238.Google Scholar
Krafft-Ebing, , “Arb. a. d. Gesamtgebiet der Psych. u. Neuropath.,” 1899, H. iv, ref. Neurol. Centralbl., 1899, xviii, p. 995.Google Scholar
Kramer, , “On the Function of the Choroid Glands (Plexuses) of the Cerebral Ventricles,” Brain, 1911, xxxiv, p. 39.Google Scholar
Krause, , “Über das kombinierte Vorkommen von multipler Sklerose und Paralysis agitans,” Charité -Annalen, 1903, xxvii, p. 525.Google Scholar
Langdon, , “Myelomalacia,” Journal of Nerv. and Ment. Dis., 1905, xxxii, p. 233.Google Scholar
Léjonne, et Lhermitte, , “De la nature inflammatoires de certaines Scléroses en Plaques,” Revue Neurol., 1910, xx, p. 665.Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, , “Zur Lehre von der Cerebrospinalflussigkeit,” Zeits. f. klin. Med., 1900, xl, p. 480.Google Scholar
Lhermitte, , “Hyperplasie de l'Hypophyse dans la Sclérose en Plaques,” Revue Neurol., 1910, xix, p. 327.Google Scholar
Lhermitte, et Guccione, , “Nouvelle méthode de coloration pour l'etude de la Névroglie (cellules et fibrilles),” Sémaine Méd., May 5, 1909.Google Scholar
Lhermitte, et Guccione, , “Lésions de Névroglie des Cylinderaxes et des Vaisseaux dans la Sclérose en Plaques,” Revue Neurol., 1909, xvii, p. 810.Google Scholar
Lhermitte, et Guccione, , “Les Lésions épendymaires et péri-épendymaires dans la Sclérose en Plaques,” L'Encéphale, 1909, iv, p. 220.Google Scholar
Lugaro, , Modern Problems in Psychiatry, transl. by Orr, and Rows, , p. 131, Manchester, 1913.Google Scholar
M'Intosh, and Fildes, , “The Pathology of Parasyphilis,” Lancet, Sept. 27, 1913, p. 921.Google Scholar
Mager, , “Ueber Myelitis acuta,” Arb. a. d. Neurol. Inst. Univ. Wien, 1900, vii, p. 1.Google Scholar
Mann, , “Mutability of Symptoms in Disseminated Sclerosis,” Brit. Med. Journ., July 17, 1909, p. 133.Google Scholar
Marburg, , “Die sog. akute multiple Sklerose,” Jahrb. f. Psych., 1906, xxvii, p. 211.Google Scholar
Marburg, , “Neue Beiträge zur Frage der multiplen Sklerose,” Wien med. Wochensch., 1909, p. 2147.Google Scholar
Marie, (Pierre, ), “La Sclérose en Plaques et les maladies infectieuses,” La Progrès Méd., 1884, xii, p. 287, etc.Google Scholar
Marinesco, et Minea, , “Contribution à l'histo-path. de la Sclérose en Plaques,” Revue Neurol., 1909, xvii, 2, p. 957.Google Scholar
Meek, , “Study of the Choroid Plexus,” Journ. of Compar. Neurol. and Psychol., 1907, xvii, p. 286.Google Scholar
Meine, , “Beitrag zur Lehre von der Gehirnsklerose,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk., 1898, xii, p. 394.Google Scholar
Merle, et Pastine, , “Lésions épendymaires et sous-épendymaires dans la Sclérose en Plaques,” Nouv. Icon. de la Salpêtriére, 1910, xxiii, p. 613.Google Scholar
Merzbacher, , “Untersuchungen über die Morphologie und Biologie der Abräumzellen im Zentralnerven-systems,” Histol. u. histopathol. Arbeiten (Nissl), iii, p. 1.Google Scholar
Miyake, , “Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Altersveränderungen der menschlichen Hirnrinde,” Arb. a. d. Neurol. Inst. Univ. Wien, 1906, xiii, p. 212.Google Scholar
Morawitz, , “Zur Kenntnis der multiplen Sklerose,” Deuts. Archiv f. klin. Med., 1904, lxxxii, p. 151.Google Scholar
Mott, , “The Cerebro-Spinal Fluid,” Lancet, Jan. 2 and 9, 1910, p. 1 and p. 79.Google Scholar
Mott, , "The Degeneration of the Neurone in the Light of Recent Research,” Brit. Med. Journ., Nov. 15, 1913, p. 1269.Google Scholar
Müller, , Die multiple Sklerose des Gehirns und Rückenmarks, Jena, 1904.Google Scholar
Müller, , “Über sensible Reizerscheinuugen bei beginnender multipler Sklerose,” Neurol. Centralbl., 1910, xxix, p. 17.Google Scholar
Nageotte, , “Phélnoménes de sécrétion dans le protoplasma des cellules névrogliques de la substance grise,” Comptes Rendus de la Soc. de Biologie, 1910, lxviii, p. 1068.Google Scholar
Namba, , “Zerebrospinale Herdsklerose,” Prag. med. Wochensch., 1907, xxxii, p. 27.Google Scholar
Nonne, , “Serologisches zur multiplen Sklerose,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk., 1911, xii, p. 123.Google Scholar
Obersteiner, , “Zur Histologie der Gliazellen,” Arb. a. d. NeuroL Inst. Univ. Wien, 1903, vii, p. 301.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, (Gustav, ), “Zur path. Anatomie der multiplen Sklerose,” Neurol. Centralbl., 1908, xxvii, p. 898.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, , (Gustav, ), “Histol. der frischen Herde bei multipler Sklerose,” Deuts. med. Wochensch., 1911, p. 191.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, (H.), Lehrbuch der Nervenkrankheilen, Berlin, transl. by Bruce, , 1911, i, p. 332.Google Scholar
Ormerod, , “TWO Cases of Disseminated Sclerosis,” Brain, 1907, xxx, p. 337.Google Scholar
Orr, and Rows, , “The Course of the Lymph Stream in the Spinal Roots and Cord,” Rev. of Neurol. and Google Scholar
Psychiat., 1903, i, p. 639.Google Scholar
Orr, and Rows, , “Toxic Infection of the Nervous System,” Psychiat., 1907, v, p. 345.Google Scholar
Orr, and Rows, , “Subacute and Acute Inflammatory Reactions produced in the Spinal Cord by Infection of its Lymph Stream,” Psychiat., 1912, x, p. 405.Google Scholar
Orr, , Rows, , and Stephenson, , “The Spread of Infection by the Ascending Lymph Stream of Nerves, etc.,” Psychiat., 1913, xi, p. 349.Google Scholar
Philippe, et Jones, , “L'écorce cérébrale dans la Sclérose en Plaques,” Revue Neurol., 1899, vii, p. 798.Google Scholar
Probst, , “Zur multiplen Herdsklerose,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk., 1898, xii, p. 446.Google Scholar
Redlich, , “Zur Pathologie der multiplen Sklerose,” Arb. a. d. Neurol. Inst. Univ. Wien, 1896, iv, p. 1.Google Scholar
Redlich, , “Neuen Arbeiten über die Aetiologie und Pathologie der multiplen Sklerose,” Centr. f. allg. Path., 1897, viii, p. 628.Google Scholar
Reichmann, , “Über akute disseminierte Myelitis,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk., 1910, xl, p. 24.Google Scholar
Reichmann, , “Zur Physiologie und Pathologie des Liq. Cerebrospinalis,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk., 1911, xlii, p. 1.Google Scholar
Ribbert, , “Ueber multiple Sklerose,” Virchoiv's Archiv, 1882, xc, p. 243.Google Scholar
Rindfleisch, , “Histol. Detail zu der grauen Degeneration von Gehirn und Rückenmark,” Virchow's Archiv, 1863, xxvi, p. 474.Google Scholar
Ritchie, , Article “Tumours,” Text-Book of General Pathology (Pembrey and Ritchie), London, 1913.Google Scholar
Robertson, (Ford, ), Pathology of Mental Diseases, Edinburgh, 1900.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, , “Endarteritis bei multipler Sklerose,” Archiv f. Psych., 1904, xxxviii, p. 474.Google Scholar
Rossolimo, , “Multiple Sklerose “in Handbuch der path. Anat. des Nervensystems, von Jacobsohn, Flatau, and Minot, p. 691.Google Scholar
Russell, Batten, , and Collier, , “Subacute Combined Degeneration of the Spinal Cord,” Brain, 1900, xxiii, p. 39.Google Scholar
Sachs, , “On Multiple Sclerosis,” Journ. of New. and Ment. Dis., 1898, xxv, p. 314 and p. 464.Google Scholar
Salle, , “Zur Frage über die Wege der aufsteigenden Myelitis,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk., 1906, xxxi, p. 108.Google Scholar
Sander, , “Hirnrindenbefunde bei multipler Sklerose,” Monats. f. Psych, u. Neurol, 1898, iv, p. 427.Google Scholar
Schlagenhaufer, , “Ein Fall von subakuter inselförmiger Sklerose,” Arb. a. d. Neurol. Inst. Univ. Wien, 1900, vii, p. 223.Google Scholar
Schläpfer, , “Über den Bau und die Funktion der Epithelzellen des Plexus Choroideus,” Beit z. path. Anat. u. z. allg. Path., 1905, Suppl. vii, p. 100.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, , “Zur Frage der akuten multiplen Sklerose und der Encephalo-myelitis disseminata im Kindesalter,” Arb. a. d. Neurol. Inst. Univ. Wien, 1909, xvii, p. 410.Google Scholar
Schmaus-Sacki, , Vorlesungen über die pathologische Anatomie des Rüekenmarks, Wiesbaden, 1901.Google Scholar
Schmaus, , “Akute Myelitis,” Ergebnisse der allg. Pathologie und path. Anatomie (Lubarsch u. Ostertag), 19031904, ix, p. 313.Google Scholar
Schmaus, , “Die Anwendung des Entzündungsbegriffes auf die Myelitis,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk., 1904, xxvi, p. 390.Google Scholar
Schmaus, , “Ueber die sog. ‘Lichtungsbezirke’ im Zentralnervensystem,” Münch, med. Wochensch., 1905, p. 545.Google Scholar
Schob, , “Ein Beitrag zur path. Anatomie der multiplen Sklerose,” Monats. f. Psych, u. Neurol., 1907, xxii, p. 62.Google Scholar
Schroeder, , Einführung in die Histol. u. Histopathologie des Nervensystems, Jena, 1908.Google Scholar
Schüle, , “Beitrag zur multiplen Sklerose,” Deuts. Archiv f. klin. Med., 1870, vii, p. 259.Google Scholar
Bielschowsky, Schuster U., “Beitrag zur Pathologie und Histologie der multiplen Sklerose,” Zeits. f. klin. Med., 1898, xxxiv, p. 395.Google Scholar
Sohweiger, , “Zur Kenntnis der Kleinhirn Sklerose,” Arb. a. d. Neurol. Inst. Univ. Wien, 1906, xiii, p. 260.Google Scholar
Shoyer, , “The Pathology of Disseminated Sclerosis,” Journ. of Path, and Bad,., 1903, viii, p. 125.Google Scholar
Siemerling, u. Raecke, , “Zur path. Anatomie u. Pathogenese der multiplen Sklerose,” Archiv f. Psychiat., 1911, xlviii, p. 824.Google Scholar
Singer, , “The Pathology of so-called Acute Myelitis,” Brain, 1902, xxv, p. 332.Google Scholar
Spielmeyer, , “Über einige anatomische Ähnlichkeiten zwischen progressive Paralyse u. multipler Sklerose,” Zeits. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psych., 1910, i, p. 660.Google Scholar
Spiller, , “A Case of Malaria presenting the Symptoms of Disseminated Sclerosis,” Amer. Journ. of Med. Sc, 1900, cxx, p. 629.Google Scholar
Spiller, , ”Multiple Sclerosis,” Amer. Journ. of Med. Sc, 1903, cxxv, p. 61.Google Scholar
Spiller, and Camp, , “Multiple Sclerosis,” Journ. of Nerv. and Ment. Dis., 1904, xxxi, p. 433.Google Scholar
Stadelmann u., Lewandowsky, “Akute multiple Sklerose oder dissemiuierte Myelitis?Neurol. Centralbl, 1907, xxvi, p. 1001.Google Scholar
Strähuber, , “Ueber Degenerations- und Proliferations- vorgänge bei multiple Sklerose,” Beitr. z. path. Anat. u. z. allg. Path., 1903, xxxiii, p. 409.Google Scholar
Strähuber, , “Zur Histologie der multiplen Sklerose,” Neurol. Centralbl, 1904, xxiii, p. 55.Google Scholar
Strumpell, , “Zur Pathologie der multiplen Sklerose,” Neurol. Centralbl, 1896, xv, p. 961.Google Scholar
Stursberg, , “Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Cerebrospinal-flussigkeit,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk., 1911, xlii, p. 325.Google Scholar
Taylor, , “Zur path. Anatomie der multiplen Sklerose,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk., 1894, v, p. 1.Google Scholar
Taylor, , “Multiple Sclerosis,” Med. Record, 1905, lxviii, p. 36.Google Scholar
Taylor, , “Multiple Sclerosis,” Journ. of Nerv. and Ment. Dis., 1906, xxxiii, p. 361.Google Scholar
Thoma, , “Zur path. Histologie der multiplen Sklerose,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk., 1900, xvii, p. 263.Google Scholar
Tredgold, , “Three Dissimilar Cases of Multiple Lesions of the Central Nervous System,” Archives of Neurology (Mott), 1902, i, p. 453.Google Scholar
Tredgold, , “Disseminated Sclerosis,” Rev. of Neurol. and Psychiat., 1904, ii, p. 497.Google Scholar
Volsch, , “Ein Fall von akuter multipler Sklerose,” Monats.f. Psych, u. Neurol., 1908, xxiii, p. 111.Google Scholar
Volsch, , ”Über multiple Sklerose,” Fortschritte der Medizin, 1910, xxviii, p. 640.Google Scholar
Walker, (Ainley, ), Article “Inflammation,” Text-book of General Pathology (Pembrey and Ritchie), London, 1913.Google Scholar
Wallbaum, , “Ueber multiple Sklerose nach psychischen Shock,” Deuts. med. Wochenschr., Dez. 10, 1908, p. 2159.Google Scholar
Weber, , “Der heutige Stand der Neurogliafrage,” Neurol. Centralbl., 1903, xxii, p. 10.Google Scholar
Wegelin, , “Über akut Verlaufende multiple Sklerose,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk., 1906, xxxi, p. 313.Google Scholar
Weigert, , “Zur pathologischen Histologie des Neurogliafasergerusts,” Centr. f. allg. Path. u. path. Anat., 1890, i, p. 729.Google Scholar
Weisengberg, and Ingham, , “Multiple Sclerosis,” Journ. of Nerv. and Ment. Dis., 1910, xxxvii, p. 675.Google Scholar
Westphal, , “Über Encephalomyelitis disseminata und arteriosclerotische Erkrankungen des Zentralnerven-systems in ihren Beziehungen zur multiplen Sklerose,” Neurol. Centralbl., 1909, xxviii, p. 547.Google Scholar
Windmüller, , “Über die Augenstorungen bei beginnender multipler Sklerose,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk., 1910, xxxix, p. 1.Google Scholar
Williamson, , “The Early Pathological Changes in Disseminated Sclerosis,” Manchester Med. Chronicle, 1894, xix, p. 373.Google Scholar
Williamson, , On the Relation of Spinal Diseases to the Distribution and Lesions of the Spinal Blood-vessels, London, 1895.Google Scholar
Williamson, , “Review of the Etiology and Pathology of Multiple Sclerosis,” Med. Chronicle, 1903, iv, p. 261.Google Scholar
Williamson, , Diseases of the Spinal Cord, London, 1908.Google Scholar
Wilson, (Kinnier, ), “Progressive Lenticular Degeneration,” Brain, 1912, xxxiv, p. 295.Google Scholar
Wohlwill, , “Multiple Sklerose,” Zeits. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psych., 1913, vii, p. 849 and p. 977.Google Scholar
Yoshimura, , “Das histochemische Verhalten des menschlichen Plexus choroideus,” Arb. a. d. Neurol. Inst. Univ. Wien, 19091910, xviii, p. 1.Google Scholar
Ziegler, , Lehrbuch der allg. Pathologie und path. Anatomie, Jena, 1906.Google Scholar
Zingerle, , “Klin. u. pathol. Anat Beitrag zur Kenntnis der lobären atrophischen Hirnsklerose,” Deuts. Zeits. f. Nervenheilk., 1909, xxxvi, p. 440.Google Scholar