Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:21:16.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXIV.—The Life-history and Cytology of Reticularia Lycoperdon Bull

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Malcolm Wilson  and
Elsie J. Cadman
Malcolm Wilson
Affiliation:
Reader in Mycology, University of Edinburgh
Elsie J. Cadman
Affiliation:
Assistant Lecturer in Botany, Edinburgh and East ofScotland College of Agriculture.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the last eighty years the Mycetozoa have attracted the attention of numerous investigators, largely on account of the striking differences in structure which are exhibited at successive stages in the life-history. The fact that during the early stages of their development they consist of naked masses of protoplasm and closely resemble certain lowly animal forms, while later on in the sporangial condition they assume plant-like characters, has given rise to numerous discussions as to their position in the classification of living organisms.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , 1928 , pp. 555 - 608
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Arnoldi, W., “Beiträge zur Morphologie der Gymnospermen.—III,” Flora, 87, 1900, p. 46.Google Scholar
2.Bary, A. De, Die Mycetozoen, Z. wiss. Zool., 10, 1860, p. 88.Google Scholar
3.Bary, A. De, Die Mycetozoen, 2nd ed., 1864.Google Scholar
4.Bary, A. De, Comparative Morphology and Biology of the Fungi, Mycetozoa, and Bacteria, 1887.Google Scholar
5.Bisby, G. R., “Some observations on the formation of the capillitium and the development of Physarella mirabilis and Stemonitis fusca,” Amer. Journ. Bot., 1, 1914, p. 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Blackman, V. H., “On a new method for facilitating the staining of microscopically small objects,” New Phyt., 2, 1903, p. 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Blomfield, and Schwartz, E. J., “Some observations on the tumours of Veronica Chamædrys caused by Sorosphæra Veroniæ,” Ann. Bot., 24, 1910, p. 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Buchet, S., “Apropos d'un recent travail sur les Myxomycètes,” Bull. Soc. Mycol. Fr., 37, 1921, p. 39.Google Scholar
9.Buchet, S., “Réponse à M. Skupienski,” Bull. Soc. Mycol. Fr., 37, 1921, p. 83.Google Scholar
10.Chupp, C., “Studies in the club root of cruciferous plants,” Bull. Cornell Agric. Expt. Sta., 387, 1917, p. 573.Google Scholar
11.Church, A. H., The Building of an Autotrophic Flagellate, Oxford, 1919.Google Scholar
12.Cienkowski, L., “Das Plasmodium,” Jahr. wiss. Bot., 3, 1863, p. 400.Google Scholar
13.Cienkowski, L., “Zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Myxomyceten,” Jahr. wiss. Bot., 3, 1863, p. 325.Google Scholar
14.Constantineanu, J. C., “über die Entwickelungsbedingungen der Myxomyceten,” Ann. Mycol., 4, 1906, p. 495.Google Scholar
15.Cook, W. R. I., “The genus Ligniera,” Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc., 2, 1926, p. 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Cowdry, N. H., “The cytology of the Myxomycetes,” Biol. Bull, 35, 1918, p. 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Curtis, K. M., “The life-history and cytology of Synchitrium endobioticum,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, ser. B, 210, 1921, p. 409.Google Scholar
18.Dangeard, P. A., “Recherches histologiques sur les champignons,” Botaniste, 2, 1890, p. 72.Google Scholar
19.Dangeard, P. A., “L'influence du mode de nutrition dans l'évolution de la plante,” Botaniste, 6, 1898, p. 1.Google Scholar
20.Dangeard, P. A., “Les Chlamydomondinées. Théorie de la sexualité,” Botaniste, 6, 1898, p. 263.Google Scholar
21.Dangeard, P. A., “Nutrition ordinaire, nutrition sexuelle, et nutrition holophytique,” Botaniste, 8, 1901, p. 59.Google Scholar
22.Dangeard, P. A., “La reproduction sexuelle,” Botaniste, 13, 1913–1914, p. 285.Google Scholar
23.Dobell, C. C., “The structure and life-history of Copromonas subtilis,” Quart. Journ. Micro. Sci., 52, 1908, p. 75.Google Scholar
24.Doflein, F., Lehrbuch der Protozoenkunde, 4th ed., 1916.Google Scholar
25.Doncaster, E., An Introduction to the Study of Cytology, 1920.Google Scholar
26.Ensch, N., “Notes sur les Myxomycètes,” Miscell. biolog. Paris, 1899, p. 204.Google Scholar
27.Entz, G., “über die mitotische Teilung von Polytoma uvella,” Archiv Protistenk., 38, 1917–1918, p. 325.Google Scholar
28.Famintzin, A., and Woronin, M., “Ueber zwei neue Formen von Schleimpilzen Ceratium hydnoides und Ceratium poroides,” Mem. Acad. Imp. Sci. St Petersburg, 20, 1873, p. 1.Google Scholar
29.Farmer, J. B., and Williams, J. L., “Contributions to our knowledge of the Fucaceæ,” Phil. Trans., B, 190, 1898, p. 623.Google Scholar
30.Ferdinandsen, C., and Winge, O., “Ostenfeldiella,” Ann. Bot., 28, 1914, p. 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Ferdinandsen, C., and Winge, O., “Clathrosorus,” Ann. Bot., 24, 1920, p. 467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Ferguson, M. C., “Contributions to the knowledge of the life-history of Pinus,” Proc. Wash. Acad. Sci., 6, 1904, p. 1.Google Scholar
33.Fraser, H. C. I., “Contributions to the cytology of Humaria rutilans,” Ann. Bot., 22, 1908, p. 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Guilliermond, M. A., “Observation cytologique sur un Leptomitus,” C.R.Acad. Sci. Paris, 175, 1922, p. 377.Google Scholar
35.Harper, R. A., “Cell and nuclear division in Fuligo varians,” Bot. Gaz., 30, 1900, p. 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Harper, R. A., “Cleavage in Didymium melanospermum,” Amer. Journ. Bot., 1, 1914, p. 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Harper, R. A., and Dodge, B. O., “The formation of the capillitium in certain Myxomycetes,” Ann. Bot., 28, 1914, p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Ikeno, S., “Zur Frage nach der Homologie der Blepharoplasten,” Flora, 96, 1906, p. 538.Google Scholar
39.Jahn, E., “Myxomycetenstudien, 3,” Ber. deutsch. bot. Ges., 22, 1904, p. 84.Google Scholar
40.Jahn, E., “Myxomycetenstudien, 4,” Ber. deutsch. bot. Ges., 23, 1905, p. 489.Google Scholar
41.Jahn, E., “Myxomycetenstudien, 6,” Ber. deutsch. bot. Ges., 25, 1907, p. 23.Google Scholar
42.Jahn, E., “Myxomycetenstudien, 7,” Ber. deutsch. bot. Ges., 26a, 1908, p. 342.Google Scholar
43.Jahn, E., “Myxomycetenstudien, 8,” Ber. deutsch. bot. Ges., 29, 1911, p. 231.Google Scholar
44.Jones, P. M., “Structure and cultural history of a Mycetozoan found in tobacco plants,” Bot. Gaz., 81, 1926, p. 446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45.Kiesel, A., “Untersuchungen über Protoplasma,” Z. phys. Chem., 150, 1925, p. 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46.Kiesel, A., “Untersuchungen über die Skelettsubstanz der Fruchtkörper der Myxomyceten,” Planta, 2, 1926, p. 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47.Knight, M., “Studies in the Ectocarpaceæ. The life-history and cytology of Pylaiella litoralis,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 52, 1923, p. 343.Google Scholar
48.Krantzlin, H., “Zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Sporangien bei den Trichien und Arcyrien,” Archiv Protistenk., 9, 1907, p. 170.Google Scholar
49.Kunkel, L. O., “A contribution to the life-history of Spongospora subterranea,” J. Agric. Res., 4, 1915, p. 265.Google Scholar
50.Kunkel, L. O., “Tissue invasion by Plasmodiophora Brassicœ,” J. Agric. Res., 14, 1918, p. 543.Google Scholar
51.Lapage, G., “Cannibalism in Amœba vespertilio,” Quart. Journ. Micro. Sci., 66, 1922, p. 669.Google Scholar
52.Lewitsky, G., “über die Chondriosomen bei den Myxomyzeten,” Z. Bot., 16, 1924, p. 65.Google Scholar
53.Lister, A., “Notes on Chondrioderma difforme, etc.,” Ann. Bot., 4, 1890, p. 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54.Lister, A., “Notes on the ingestion of food-material by the swarm-cells of Mycetozoa,” J. Linn. Soc. (Bot.), 25, 1890, p. 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55.Lister, A., “On the division of nuclei in the Mycetozoa,” J. Linn. Soc. (Bot.), 29, 1893, p. 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56.Lister, A., A Monograph of the Mycetozoa, 1894.Google Scholar
57.Lister, A., “On the cultivation of Mycetozoa from spores,” Journ. Bot. Lond., 39, 1901, p. 5.Google Scholar
58.Lister, A., A Monograph of the Mycetozoa, 3rd ed., 1925.Google Scholar
59.Lister, G., “The life-history of the Mycetozoa with special reference to Ceratiomyxa,” J.R.Micr. Soc., 1916, p. 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60.Lister, J. J., “Mycetozoa,” in treatise on Zoology, edit. Lankester, E. R., Protozoa, 1909.Google Scholar
61.Maire, R., and Tison, A., “La cytologie des Plasmodiophoracées,” Ann. Mycol., 7, 1909, p. 226.Google Scholar
62.Maire, R., and Tison, A., “Nouvelles recherches sur les Plasmodiophoracées,” Ann. Mycol., 9, 1911, p. 226.Google Scholar
63.Marchal, é., “Recherches cytologiques sur le genre Amblystegium,” Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belgique, 51, 1912, p. 189.Google Scholar
64.Martin, C. R., “A note on the Protozoa from sick soils,” Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 85, 1912, p. 393.Google Scholar
65.Millar, C. O., “Aseptic cultivation of Mycetozoa,” Quart. Journ. Micro. Sci., 41, N.S., 1898, p. 43.Google Scholar
66.Minchin, E. A., and Robertson, M., “On the division of the collar-cells of Clathrina coriacea,” Quart. Journ. Micro. Sci., 55, N.S., 1910, p. 611.Google Scholar
67.Nawaschin, S., “Beobachtungen über den feineren Bau und die Umwandlungen von Plasmodiophora Brassicœ,” Flora, 86, 1899, p. 404.Google Scholar
68.Olive, E. W., “Cytological studies on Ceratiomyxa,” Trans. Wisconsin Acad. Science, Arts, and Letters, 15, pt. ii, 1907, p. 753.Google Scholar
69.Olive, E. W., “Evidence of sexual reproduction in the slime-moulds,” Science, 25, N.S., 1907, p. 266.Google Scholar
70.Oltmanns, F., Morphologie und Biologic der Algen, 1904.Google Scholar
71.Osborn, T. G. B., “Spongospora subterranea,” Ann. Bot., 25, 1911, p. 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
72.Pascher, A., “Flagellaten und Rhizopoden in ihren gegenseitigen Beziehungen,” Archiv Protistenk., 38, 1917–1918, p. 1.Google Scholar
73.Pinoy, E., “Nécessité de la présence d'une bacterie pour obtenir la culture de certains Myxomycètes,” Bull. Soc. Mycol. Fr., 18, 1902, p. 286.Google Scholar
74.Pinoy, E., “Rôle des bacteries dans le développement des certains Myxomycètes,” These Faculté des Sciences, Paris, 1907.Google Scholar
75.Pinoy, E., “Rôle des bacteries dans le développement des certains Myxomycètes,” Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 21, 1907, pp. 622, 688.Google Scholar
76.Pinoy, E., “Sur l'existence d'un dimorphisme sexuel chez un Myxomycète,” C.R.Soc. Biol. Paris, 64, 1908.Google Scholar
77.Pinoy, E., “Nutrition et coloration des Myxomycètes,” C.R.Soc. Biol. Paris, 78, 1915, p. 172.Google Scholar
78.Pinoy, E., “Sur la germination des spores, sur la nutrition, et sur la sexualité chez les Myxomycètes,” C.R.Acad. Sci. Paris, 173, 1921, p. 50.Google Scholar
79.Plenge, H., “über die Verbindung zwischen Geissel und Kern bei den Sehwärmern der Mycetozoen und bei den Flagellaten,” Verhandl. Naturhist. Med. Vereins Heidelberg, 6, 1898–1901, p. 217.Google Scholar
80.Prowazek, J., “Kernveränderung in Myxomycetenplasmodien,” Oesterr. Bot. Z., 54, 1904, p. 278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
81.Prowazek, S., “Zur Kernteilung der Plasmodiophora Brassicœ,” Oesterr. Bot. Z., 52, 1902, p. 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
82.Prowazek, S., “über den Erreger der Kohlhernie, Plasmodiophora Brassicœ,” Arb. dem Kaiserl. Gesund., 22, 1905, p. 396.Google Scholar
83.Reynolds, B. D., “Interactions of protoplasmic masses in relation to the study of heredity and environment in Arcella polypora,” Biol. Bull, 46, 1924, p. 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
84.Robertson, T. B., The Chemical Basis of Growth and Senescence, 1923.Google Scholar
85.Rosen, F., “Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Pflanzenzellen,” Beit. Biol. Pflanzen, 6, 1893, p. 237.Google Scholar
86.Schaudinn, F., “Generations- und Wirtwechsel bei Trypanosoma und Spirochœta,” Arb. Gesund., 20, 1924, p. 387.Google Scholar
87.Schwartz, E. J., “The life-history and cytology of Sorosphœra graminis,” Ann. Bot., 25, 1911, p. 791.Google Scholar
88.Sharp, L. W., “Spermatogenesis in Equisetum,” Bot. Gaz., 54, 1912, p. 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
89.Skupienski, F. X., “Sur la sexualité des Champignons Myxomycètes,” C.R.Acad. Sci. Paris, 165, 1917, p. 118.Google Scholar
90.Skupienski, F. X., “Sur la sexualité des Champignons Myxomycètes,” C.R.Acad. Sci. Paris, 167, 1918, p. 31.Google Scholar
91.Skupienski, F. X., “Influence du milieu nutritif sur le développement des Champignons Myxomycètes,” C.R.Soc. Biol. Paris, 82, 1919, p. 379.Google Scholar
92.Skupienski, F. X., Recherches sur le cycle évolutif de certains Myxomycètes, 1920.Google Scholar
93.Skupienski, F. X., “Réponse à, la critique de M. Buchet,” Bull. Mycol. Fr., 37, 1921, p. 44.Google Scholar
94.Skupienski, F. X., “Sur le cycle évolutif chez Didymium difforme,” C.R.Acad. Sci. Paris, 182, 1926, p. 150.Google Scholar
95.Strasburger, E., “Zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Sporangien von Trichia fallax,” Bot. Ztg., 1884, pp. 306, 321.Google Scholar
96.Strasburger, E., Histologische Beiträge.—II, 1889.Google Scholar
97.Strasburger, E., Histologische Beiträge, V., 1893.Google Scholar
98.Strasburger, E., Histologische Beiträge, VI., 1900.Google Scholar
99.Swezy, O., “The kinetonucleus of flagellates,” Univ. California Publ. Zool., 16, 1916, p. 185.Google Scholar
100.Terby, J., “L'origine du Blépharoplaste chez le Plasmodiophora Brassicœ,” Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belgique, 56, 1923, p. 48.Google Scholar
101.Vonwiller, P., “über den Bau des Plasmas der niedersten Tiere,” Archiv Protistenh., 38, 1917–1918, p. 279.Google Scholar
102.Vonwiller, P., “über den Bau des Plasmas der niedersten Tiere. II. Lycogala epidendron,” Archiv Protistenh., 40, 1919, p. 1.Google Scholar
103.Wilson, C. W., “On the life-history of a soil amœba,” Univ. California Publ. Zool., 16, 1916, p. 241.Google Scholar
104.Wilson, M., “Spermatogenesis in the Bryophyta,” Ann. Bot., 25, 1911, p. 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
105.Wilson, M., and Cadman, E. J., “The life-history and cytology of Reticularia Lycoperdon,” Repts. Brit. Assoc. Liverpool, 1923, p. 488, and Oxford, 1926, p. 405.Google Scholar
106.Winge, ö., “Cytological studies in the Plasmodiophoraceæ,” Arkiv Bot., 12, No. 9, 1912.Google Scholar
107.Woronin, M., “Plasmodiophora Brassicœ,” Jahrb. wiss. Bot., 11, 1878, p. 548.Google Scholar