Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:31:01.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXIX.—On the Morphology, Feeding Mechanisms, and Digestion of Ensis siliqua (Schumacher)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Alastair Graham
Alastair Graham
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Zoology in the University of Sheffield.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The work described in the following pages was carried out in the Department of Zoology of the University of Edinburgh and at the Marine Laboratory, Plymouth. It is my pleasant task to thank the British Association for the use of their table at Plymouth, and the staffs of the Plymouth Laboratory and of the Department of Zoology at Edinburgh for help and advice; in particular, I would thank Professor J. H. Ashworth, F.R.S., under whose direction the work was carried out, for his continued aid and interest at every stage.

The animal which was used throughout the investigation was the common razor shellfish or spoutfish of our coasts, Ensis siliqua (Schumacher). The specimens studied at Edinburgh were obtained from a sandy bay at Port Seton, about ten miles below Edinburgh on the Firth of Forth; at Plymouth they were got from the east bank of the Salcombe Estuary. At both places razor shellfish were abundant at the low-water mark of spring tides, and at both Ensis siliqua was the sole species obtained.

For histological purposes small- whole animals, which were very rare, and small pieces of tissue were fixed in Bouin's fluid, in E. Allen's chromic Bouin with urea, or in corrosive sublimate and acetic mixture, and sections, cut 8 μ and 12 μ thick, were stained with Heidenhain's iron alum hæmatoxylin or in Delafield's hæmatoxylin and counter-stained with eosin.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , 1931 , pp. 725 - 751
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, H., and Adams, A. A. (1858). Genera of Recent Mollusca, ii, iii.Google Scholar
Alder, J., and Hancock, A. (1851). “On the Branchial Currents in Pholas and Mya,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (2nd series), viii.Google Scholar
Allen, W. R. (1914). “The Food and Feeding Habits of Freshwater Mussels,” Biol. Bid., xxvii.Google Scholar
Bayliss, W. M. (1925). The Nature of Enzyme Action. London.Google Scholar
Berkeley, C. (1923). “On the Crystalline Style as a Possible Factor in the Anaerobic Respiration of Certain Marine Molluses,” J. Exp. Zool., xxxvii.Google Scholar
Bloomer, H. H. (1901a). “The Anatomy of the British Species of the Genus Solen, L.,” I, J. Malacology, viii.Google Scholar
Bloomer, H. H. (1901b). “The Anatomy of the British Species of the Genus Solen, L.,” II, J. Malacology, viii.Google Scholar
Bloomer, H. H. (1902). “The Anatomy of the British Species of the Genus Solen, L.,” III, J. Malacology, ix.Google Scholar
Bloomer, H. H. (1903a). “The Classification of the British Species of the Genus Solen, L.,” J. Malacology, x.Google Scholar
Bloomer, H. H. (1903b). “On the Origin and Function of the Fourth Aperture in some Pelecypoda,” J. Malacology, x.Google Scholar
Bloomer, H. H. (1905). “The Anatomy of various Species of Solenidæ: Addenda and Corrigenda,” J. Malacology, xiii.Google Scholar
Clark, W. M. (1923). The Determination of Hydrogen Ions. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Coupin, H. (1900). “Sur les fonctions do la tige crystalline dos Acéphales,” C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, cxxx.Google Scholar
Dakin, W. J. (1909). “Pecten,” L.M.B.C. Memoir. London.Google Scholar
Deshayes, A. (1848). Exploration scieniifique de l'Algérie. Paris.Google Scholar
Drew, G. A. (1907). “The Habits and Movements of the Razor Shell Clam, Ensis direclus Con.,” Biol. Bui., xii.Google Scholar
Drew, G. A. (1908). “The Physiology of the Nervous System of the Razor Shell Clam, Ensis direclus Con.,” J. Exp. Zool., v.Google Scholar
Forbes, E., and Hanley, S. (1853). A History of British Molluscs and their Shells. London.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, G. (1927). “Die Grabbewegung der Soleniden,” Zs. vergl. Phyaiol., vi.Google Scholar
Fredericq, L. (1878). “La digestion des matières albuminoides chez quelques invertébrés,” Arch. zool. Paris, vii.Google Scholar
Ghosh, E. (1920). “Taxonomic Studies on the Soft Parts of the Solenidæ,” Rec. Ind. Mus., xix.Google Scholar
Grobben, C. (1888). “Die Pericardialdrüse der Lamellibranchiaten. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Anatomie dieser Molluskenelasse,” Arb. Zool. Inst. Univ. Wien, vii.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, J. G. (1862). British Conchology. London.Google Scholar
Kellogg, J. L. (1915). “Ciliary Mechanisms of Lamellibranchs with Descriptions of Anatomy,” J. Morph., xxvi.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, N. A. (1925). “The Crystalline Style in Gastropods,” Q.J. Microsc. Sci., lxix.Google Scholar
Menegaux, A. (1890). Recherches sur la circulation des Lamellibranches marins. Besançon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitra, S. B. (1901). “The Crystalline Style of Lamellibranchs,” Q.J. Microsc. Sci., xliv.Google Scholar
Nelson, T. C. (1918). “On the Origin, Nature, and Function of the Crystalline Style of Lamellibranchs,” J. Morph., xxxi.Google Scholar
Nelson, T. C. (1925). “Recent Contributions to the Knowledge of the Crystalline Style of Lamellibranchs,” Biol. Bul., xlix.Google Scholar
Nicol, E. A. T. (1930). “The Feeding Mechanism, Formation of the Tube, and Physiology of Digestion in Sabella pavonina,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., lvi.Google Scholar
Orton, J. H. (1912). “The Mode of Feeding in Crepidula,” J. Mar. Biol. Ass. (N.S.), ix.Google Scholar
Orton, J. H. (1913). “The Ciliary Mechanisms on the Gill and the Mode of Feeding in Amphioxus, Ascidians, and Solenomya togata,” J. Mar. Biol. Ass. (N.S.), x.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P. (1890). “Sur la quatrième orifice palléal des Pélécypodes,” C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, cx.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P. (1906). “Mollusca,” in Lankester E. R., A Treatise on Zoology, Part V. London.Google Scholar
Ridewood, W. G. (1903). “On the Structure of the Gills of the Lamellibranchia,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., cxcv.Google Scholar
Schumacher, C. F. (1811). Essai d'un nouveau système des habitations des vers testacés. Paris.Google Scholar
Sharp, B. (1886). “On Visual Organs in Lamellibranchs,” Mitt. Zool. Stat. Neap., v.Google Scholar
Stenta, M. (1901). “Über eine bei Lamellibranchiaten beobachtete untere Rückströmung sowie über die Wimperrinne des Mantels von Pinna,” Zool. Anz., xi.Google Scholar
Stenta, M. (1903). “Zur Kenntniss der Strömungen im Mantelraume der Lamellibranchiaten,” Arb. Zool. Inst. Univ. Wien, xiv.Google Scholar
Thiele, J. (1886). “Die Mundlappen der Lamellibranchiaten,” Zs. wiss. Zool., xliv.Google Scholar
Wallengren, H. (1905). “Zur Biologie der Muscheln: I, Die Wasserströmungen; II, Die Nahrungsaufnahme,” Lunds Univ. Årsskr., Series 2, 1, Nos. 2 and 3.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M. (1923). “The Mechanism of Feeding, Digestion, and Assimilation in the Lamellibranch Mya,” Brit. J. Exp. Zool., i.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M. (1925a). “The Hydrogen Ion Concentration in the Gut of Certain Lamellibranchs and Gastropods,” J. Mar. Biol. Ass. (N.S.), xiii.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M. (1925b). “The Digestive Diverticula in the Lamellibranchs,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., liv.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M. (1926). “Structure and Physiology of the Organs of Feeding and Digestion in Ostrea edulis,” J. Mar. Biol. Ass. (N.S.), xiv.Google Scholar