Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:45:13.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XX.—The Phase of the Nucleus known as Synapsis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

A. Anstruther Lawson
A. Anstruther Lawson
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Botany, University of Glasgow.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

That phase of the nucleus just preceding the heterotype mitosis, and which was first called Synapsis by Moore (1895), has come to be regarded as an important and critical period in the life-cycle. It was called synapsis because of the apparent condensation and contraction of the chromatin at one side of the nuclear cavity. This discovery at first received scant support, the synaptic contraction being considered by many investigators to be nothing more than an artifact—an artificial contraction caused by imperfect fixation. In 1897, however, Moore's discovery was confirmed by Miss Sargant, who not only observed it in fixed material, but also found it in the living pollen-mother-cells of Lilium.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , 1911 , pp. 591 - 604
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1911

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Allan, C. E., 1904. “Chromosome Reduction in Lilium canadense,” Bot. Gaz., xxxvii. p. 464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, C. E., 1905. “Nuclear Division in the Pollen-mother-cells of Lilium canadense,” Ann. Bot., xix. p. 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, C. E., 1905. “Das Verhalten der Kernsubstanzen der Synapsis in den Pollenmutterzelleu von Lilium canadense,” Jahrb. wiss. Bot., xlii. p. 72.Google Scholar
Berghs, J., 1904. “La formation des chromosomes hétérotypiques dans la sporogénèse végétale” (III. and IV.), La Cellule, xxii. p. 43.Google Scholar
Burlingame, L. L., 1907. “The Sporangium of the Ophioglossales,” Bot. Gaz., xliv. p. 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardiff, J. D., 1906. “A Study of Synapsis and Reduction,” Bull. Torr. Bot. Club, xxxiii. p. 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B. M., 1909. “Cytological Studies on Œnothera,” Ann. Bot., xxiii. p, 551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duggar, B. M., 1900. “Studies in the Development of the Pollen Grain in Symplocarpus fœtidus and Peltandra undulata,” Bot. Gaz., xxix. p. 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, J. B., and Moore, J. E. S., 1905. “On the Maiotic Phase in Animals and Plants,” Quar. Jour. Micro. Soc., xlviii. p. 489.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C.M., 1904. “Contributions to the Knowledge of the Life-history of Pinus, etc.,” Proc. Wash. Acad. Sri., vi. p. 1.Google Scholar
Fraser, H. C. I., 1908. “Contribution to the Cytology of Humaria rullans,” Ann. Bot., xxii. p. 35, 1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, R. R., 1907. “Pollen Development in Hybrids of Œnothera lata × O. lamarkiana and its relation to Mutation,” Bot. Gaz., xliii. p. 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grégoire, V., 1908. “Les phénomènes de l'étape synaptique représentent-ils une caryocinèse avortée?” La Cellule, xxv. p. 87.Google Scholar
Miyake, K., 1905. “Ueber Reductionstheilung in den Pollenmutterzellen einiger Monokotylen,” Jahrb. wiss. Bot., xlii. p. 82.Google Scholar
Moore, J. E. S., 1895. “On the Essential Similarity of the process of Chromosome Reduction in Animals and Plants,” Ann. Bot., ix, p. 431, 1895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mottier, D. M., 1907. “The Development of the Heterotype Chromosomes in Pollen-mother-cells,” Ann. Bot., xxi. 83.Google Scholar
Overton, J. B., 1909. “On the Organisation of the Nuclei in the Pollen-mother-cells of certain Plants, with special reference to the Permanence of the Chromosomes,” Ann. Bot., xxiii, No. 89.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, O., 1901. “Ueber die Pollenbildung von Zostera,” Medd. f. Stock. Högs. Bot. Inst.Google Scholar
Sargant, E., 1897. “The Formation of the Sexual Nuclei in Lilium martagon,” Ann. Bot, xi., No. 42.Google Scholar
Wiegand, K. M., 1899. “The Development of the Microsporangium and Microspores in Convallaria and Potamogeten,” Bot. Gaz., xxviii. p. 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamanouchi, S., 1908. “Sporogenesis in Nephrodium,” Bot. Gaz., xlv. p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar