Article contents
XXVII.—Scottish National Antarctic Expedition, 1902–1904: Cambrian Organic Remains from a Dredging in the Weddell Sea
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 July 2012
Extract
From a biological point of view considerable interest must always attend any investigation of the earliest known organisms, and, although we may legitimately infer that a flora and fauna existed prior to Cambrian times, the organisms preserved for us in rocks of that age constitute, at present, the first chapter of palæontological history. For this reason alone the Archæocyathinæ are important, since they form part of the Lower Cambrian fauna. When, however, we consider that the genera included in the group are very distinct from one another (indicating that the family was probably of considerable antiquity even in those early times), that the types have, as far as we know, a wide geographical distribution, and that to certain skeletal characters usually associated with the Porifera they unite others more common among the Cœlenterata, interest is still further stimulated. On the other hand, although recorded in great abundance from several widely separated localities, they are not, as a rule, common fossils in Cambrian strata, and consequently the group has not received much attention.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , 1921 , pp. 681 - 714
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1921
References
page 681 note * Bornemann, , “Verstein. Sardinien,” Nova Acta der Ksl. Leop.-Carol. Deut. Akad. der Nat., vol. li and vol. lvi, Halle, 1886, 1891.Google Scholar
page 681 note † Taylor, , “Archæocyathinæ from Cambrian of South Australia,” Mem. Roy. Soc. S. Australia, vol. ii, pt. ii, 1910.Google Scholar
page 682 note * Hinde, G. J., Q.J.G.S., vol. xlv, p. 133, footnote.
page 682 note † British Association Report: Meeting in Australia, 1914, p. 413.
page 683 note * compte rendu du XIe Congrès Géologique International, 1910, p. 774.
page 683 note † British Antarctic Expedition, 1907–9, “Geology,” vol. i, pp. 235 et seq.
page 686 note * British Antarctic Expedition, 1907–9 pl. lxxix, fig. 5.
page 687 note * Geol. Zeitschr., 1884, p. 706.
page 687 note † Mem. Roy. Soc. South Australia, vol. ii, part ii, p. 105.
page 687 note ‡ Geology of Canada, “New Species of Lower Silurian Fossils,” p. 3.
page 692 note * Bornemann, loc. cit., p. 55.
page 692 note † Bornemann, loc. cit., p. 57; and Geol. Zeitschr., 1854, p. 704.
page 692 note ‡ Calculated by measurement from Bornemann, loc. cit., Taf. xii, figs. 6a, 6b.
page 693 note * Hinde, , Q.J.G.S., vol. xlv, 1889.Google Scholar
page 693 note † Hinde, loc. cit., p. 138, footnote.
page 694 note * Nova Acta der Ksl. Leop.-Carol. Deut. Akad. der Nat., vol. li, pp. 47, 48.
page 694 note † Mem. Roy. Soc. S. Australia, vol. ii, part ii, 1910, p. 113.
page 695 note * Geol. Zeitschr., 1883.
page 697 note * Mem. Roy. Soc. South Australia, vol. ii, part ii, 1910.
page 698 note * “Verstein. Sardinien,” Nova Acta der Ksl. Leop.-Carol. Deut. Akad. der Nat., vol. lvi, 1891, pl. ii.
page 699 note * Mem. Roy. Soc. South Australia, vol. ii, part ii, 1910.
page 701 note * Lat. fultus, supported.
page 702 note * Gk. endutos, clothed.
page 705 note * Mem. Roy. Soc. S. Australia, vol. ii, part ii, 1910, text-fig. 9.
page 708 note * British Antarctic Expedition, 1907–9, “Geology,” vol. i, p. 240.
page 708 note † Ibid., vol. ii, pp. 81–83.
page 708 note ‡ Bruce, Weddell Sea position, 62° 10′ S., 40° 20′ W., Scottish National Antarctic Expedition, 1902–4; Shackleton, Beardmore Glacier position, 83° 42′ S., 171° 30′ E., British Antarctic Expedition, 1907–9, “Geology,” vol. i, p. 235.
- 26
- Cited by