Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:02:13.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XXX.—On the Feeding Mechanism of Certain Marine Ostracods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

H. Graham Cannon
Affiliation:
Beyer Professor of Zoology in the Victoria University of Manchester.

Extract

Systematists agree that the Asteropid Ostracods are closely related to the other subfamilies of the Cypridinidæ. Asterope agrees with Cypridina in the form of its antennules and antennæ, in the peculiar bottle-brush second trunk limb so characteristic of the Cypridinidæ, and, to a lesser extent, in the gnathobasic armature of its mandibles, and yet, in its mouth parts, especially the maxillules and maxillæ, Asterope differs totally from Cypridina, and, in fact, from any other Crustacean. Attempts to homologize these limbs with those of other Ostracoda have been made by many systematists, but without much success. Thus recently Skogsberg (1920, p. 39), referring to the maxillule of Asterope, states: “This far-reaching modification and the total lack of known transitional forms makes any attempt at homologization merely a caprice, at worst obviously incorrect, at best unverifiable”; and Hansen (1925, p. 69), discussing the maxillule, states that “the chitinization is weak and lobes rudimentary that it may be impossible to interpret all points with real certainty before forms intermediate between Cypridina and Asterope have been discovered—if they exist.” Despite this impasse along purely morphological lines, I think it is possible, by studying the feeding mechanisms, to establish the relationship between the Asteropid and Cypridinid constitution.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Cannon, H. G., 1927. “On the Feeding Mechanism of Nebalia bipes,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lv, pp. 355369.Google Scholar
Cannon, H. G., 1931. “On the Anatomy of a Marine Ostracod, Cypridina (Doloria) levis Skogsberg,” “DiscoveryReports, Cambridge, vol. ii, pp. 435482, pls. 6–7.Google Scholar
Cannon, H. G., and Manton, S. M., 1929. “On the Feeding Mechanism of the Syncarid Crustacea,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lvi, pp. 175189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, H. J., 1925. Studies on Arthropoda, II, Copenhagen, pp. 1176, pls. 1–8.Google Scholar
Müller, G. W., 1890. “Neue Cypridiniden,” Zool. Jahrb., Abt. für Systematik, Jena, vol. v, pp. 211252, pls. 25–27.Google Scholar
Müller, G. W., 1894. Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel—Die Ostracoden, Berlin, pp. 1404, pls. 1–40.Google Scholar
Müller, G. W., 1912. Das Tierreich—Ostracoda, Berlin, pp. 1434.Google Scholar
Sars, G. O., 1928. An Account of the Crustacea of Norway, Bergen, vol. ix, pp. 1277, pls. 1–119.Google Scholar
Scott, T., 1894. “Reports on Entomostraca from the Gulf of Guinea, collected by John Rattray, B.Sc.,” Trans. Linn. Soc. London, Ser. 2, vol. vi, pp. 1162, pls. 1–15.Google Scholar
Skogsberg, T., 1920. “Studies on Marine Ostracods, Part I,” Zool. Bidr., Uppsala, Suppl. Bd. 1, pp. 1784.Google Scholar