Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:58:19.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sharia Tribunals, Rabbinical Courts, and Christian Panels: Religious Arbitration in America and the West Michael J Broyde Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017, xxvi + 282 pp (hardback £61.00) ISBN: 978-0-19-064028-6

Review products

Sharia Tribunals, Rabbinical Courts, and Christian Panels: Religious Arbitration in America and the West Michael J Broyde Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017, xxvi + 282 pp (hardback £61.00) ISBN: 978-0-19-064028-6

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2019

Brigitte Clark
Brigitte Clark*
Affiliation:
Oxford Brookes University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Ecclesiastical Law Journal , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 96 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Bakht, N, ‘Family arbitration using sharia law: examining Ontario's Arbitration Act and its impact on women’, (2004) 1:1 Muslim World Journal of Human Rights, p 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar, <https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4419.1022>, accessed 17 October 2018.

2 See Stopler, G, ‘Countenancing the oppression of women: how liberals tolerate religious and cultural practices that discriminate against women’, (2003) 12 Columbia Journal of Gender & Law 154–221 at 197Google Scholar.

3 See Bakht, ‘Family arbitration’.

4 Gaudreault-DesBiens, J-F, ‘The limits of private justice? The problems of the state recognition of arbitral awards in family and personal status disputes in Ontario’, (2005) 16:1 Perspectives 18–31Google Scholar.

5 Saris, A, ‘Challenging gender stereotypes: gender-sensitive imams and the resolution of family disputes in Montreal’ in Banda, E and Joffe, L Fishbayn (eds), Women's Rights and Religious Law: domestic and international perspectives (Abingdon, 2016), pp 255–277Google Scholar.