Hostname: page-component-784d4fb959-pn44h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-14T23:14:33.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Bounds Test for Equality Between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regression Models Under Heteroscedasticity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2010

Kazuhiro Ohtani  and
Masahito Kobayashi
Kazuhiro Ohtani
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Kobe University of Commerce
Masahito Kobayashi
Affiliation:
Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article proposes a small sample bounds test for equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions with unequal disturbance variances. The probability that our test is inconclusive is given under the null hypothesis. It is also shown that our test is more powerful than the Jayatissa test when the regression coefficients differ substantially.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , August 1986 , pp. 220 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Abramowitz, M. & Stegum, I. A.. Handbook of Mathematical Functions. New York: Dover Publications, 1972.Google Scholar
2. Boot, J.C.G. & Wit, G. M. de. Investment Demand: An Empirical Contribution to the Aggregating Problem. International Economic Review 1 (1960): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Chow, G. C.Test of Equality between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions. Econometrica 28 (1960): 591–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Gurland, J. & McCullough, R. S.. Testing Equality of Means after a Preliminary Test of Equality of Variances. Biometrika 49 (1962): 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Honda, Y.On Tests of Equality between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions When Disturbance Variances are Unequal. The Manchester School 49 (1982), 116–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Honda, Y. & Ohtani, K.. Modified Wald Test in Tests of Equality between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions under Heteroscedasticity. The Manchester School forthcoming.Google Scholar
7. Jayatissa, W. A.Tests of Equality between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions When Disturbance Variances are Unequal. Econometrica 45 (1977): 1291–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Kohler, D. F.Conflict among Testing Procedures? Economics Letters 11 (1983): 353–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Ohtani, K. & Toyoda, T.. Small Sample Properties of Tests of Equality between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions under Heteroscedasticity. International Economic Review 26 (1985): 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Ohtani, K. & Toyoda, T.. A Monte Carlo Study of the Wald, LM, and LR Tests in a Heteroscedastic Linear Model. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation 14 (1985): 735–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. J, Rothenberg. T.. Hypothesis Testing in Linear Models When the Error Co variance Matrix is Nonscalar. Econometrica 45 (1977): 1293–1298.Google Scholar
12. Schmidt, P. & Sickles, R.. Some Further Evidence on the Use of the Chow Test under Heteroscedasticity. Econometrica 45 (1977), 1293–4298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Thursby, J. G.Misspecification, Heteroscedasticity, and the Chow and Goldfeld-Quandt Tests. Review of Economics and Statistics 64 (1982): 314–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Toyoda, T.Use of the Chow Test under Heteroscedasticity. Econometrica. 42 (1974): 601–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Watt, P. A.Tests of Equality between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions When Disturbance Variances are Unequal: Some Small Sample Properties. The Manchester School 47 (1979): 391–396.Google Scholar
16. Welch, B. L.The Generalization of ‘The Student's Problem When Several Different Population Variances are Involved. Biometrika 34 (1947),28–35Google ScholarPubMed