Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:25:32.057Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COMMENTS ON NEUBERG'S REVIEW OF THE HISTORY OF ECONOMETRIC IDEAS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

G. Michael Lail  and
Neil De Marchi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , February 1995 , pp. 386 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Friedman, M. (1940) Review of J. Tinbergen's Business Cycles in the United States of America, 1919–1932. American Economic Review 30 (September), 657–661.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T.S. (1977) The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226217239.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lail, G.M. (1993) The Failure of Frisch's Vision. Ph.D. Dissertation, Duke University.Google Scholar
Pearson, E.S. (1962) Some thoughts on statistical inference. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33 (September), 394–403.10.1214/aoms/1177704566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. (1951) Two dogmas of empiricism. Philosophical Reviews 51 (January), 20–43.10.2307/2181906CrossRefGoogle Scholar