Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:40:42.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ESTIMATION RISK IN GARCH VaR AND ES ESTIMATES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2008

Feng Gao*
Affiliation:
Tsinghua University
Fengming Song
Affiliation:
Tsinghua University
*
Address correspondence to Feng Gao, Department of Finance, School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, P.R. China; e-mail: gaof@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn

Abstract

Value-at-risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES) are now both widely used risk measures. However, users have not paid much attention to the estimation risk issues, especially in the case of heteroskedastic financial time series. The key challenge arises from the fact that the estimated generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) innovations are not the true independent innovations. The purpose of this work is to provide an analytical method to assess the precision of conditional VaR and ES in the GARCH model estimated by the filtered historical simulation (FHS) method based on the asymptotic behavior of the residual empirical distribution function in GARCH processes. The proposed method is evaluated by simulation and proved valid.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramson, I.S. (1982) On bandwidth variation in kernel estimates—a square root law. Annals of Statistics 10, 12171223.Google Scholar
Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.M., & Heath, D. (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance 9(3), 203228.Google Scholar
Barone-Adesi, G., Giannopoulos, K., & Vosper, L. (1999) VaR without correlations for nonlinear portfolios. Journal of Futures Markets 19, 583602.Google Scholar
Berkes, I. & Horvath, L. (2003) Limit results for the empirical process of squared residuals in GARCH models. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 105, 271298.Google Scholar
Berkes, I., Horvath, L., & Kokoszka, P. (2003) GARCH processes: Structure and estimation. Bernoulli 9, 201228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billingsley, P. (1999) Convergence of Probability Measures, 2nd ed. Wiley.Google Scholar
Bollerslev, T. (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 31, 307327.Google Scholar
Bougerol, P. & Picard, N. (1992) Stationarity of GARCH processes and of some non-negative time series. Journal of Econometrics 52, 115127.Google Scholar
Chan, N.H., Deng, S.J., Peng, L., & Xia, Z. (2007) Interval estimation for the conditional value-at-risk based on GARCH models with heavy tailed innovations. Journal of Econometrics 137, 556576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S.X. & Tang, C.Y. (2005) Nonparametric inference of value-at-risk for dependent financial returns. Journal of Financial Econometrics 3, 227255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoffersen, P. & Gonçalves, S. (2005) Estimation risk in financial risk management. Journal of Risk 7, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowd, K. (2000) Assessing VaR accuracy. Derivatives Quarterly 6, 6163.Google Scholar
Duan, J.C. (1994) Maximum likelihood estimation using price data of the derivative contract. Mathematical Finance 4, 155167.Google Scholar
Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C., & Mikosch, T. (1997) Modelling Extremal Events for Insurance and Finance. Springer.Google Scholar
Ghosh, J.K. (1971) A new proof of the Bahadur representation of quantiles and an application. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 42, 19571961.Google Scholar
Glosten, L.R., Jagannathan, R., & Runkle, D.E. (1993) On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess returns on stocks. Journal of Finance 48, 17791801.Google Scholar
Hall, P. (1992) Effect of bias estimation on coverage accuracy of bootstrap confidence intervals for a probability density. Annals of Statistics 20, 675694.Google Scholar
Hall, P. & Yao, Q. (2003) Inference in ARCH and GARCH models with heavy-tailed errors. Econometrica 71, 285317.Google Scholar
Jorion, P. (1996) Risk2: Measuring the risk in value-at-risk. Financial Analysts Journal 52, 4756.Google Scholar
Jorion, P. (2000) Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Koul, H. & Ling, S. (2006) Fitting an error distribution in some heteroscedastic time series models. Annals of Statistics 34, 9941012.Google Scholar
Kuester, K., Mittnik, S., & Paolella, M.S. (2006) Value-at-risk prediction: A comparison of alternative strategies. Journal of Financial Econometrics 4, 5389.Google Scholar
Lee, S.W. & Hansen, B.E. (1994) Asymptotic theory for the GARCH(1,1) quasi-maximum likelihood estimator. Econometric Theory 10, 2952.Google Scholar
Ling, S. (2007) Self-weighted and local quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for ARMA-GARCH/IGARCH models. Journal of Econometrics 140(2), 849873.Google Scholar
Lumsdaine, R.L. (1996) Consistency and asymptotic normality of the quasi-maximum likelihood estimator in IGARCH(1,1) and covariance stationary GARCH(1,1) models. Econometrica 64, 575596.Google Scholar
McNeil, A.J. & Frey, R. (2000) Estimation of tail-related risk measures for heteroscedastic financial time series: An extreme value approach. Journal of Empirical Finance 7, 271300.Google Scholar
Peng, L. & Yao, Q. (2003) Least absolute deviations estimator for ARCH and GARCH models. Biometrika 90, 967975.Google Scholar
Scaillet, O. (2004) Nonparametric estimation and sensitivity analysis of expected shortfall. Mathematical Finance 14, 115129.Google Scholar
Scott, D.W. (1992) Multivariate Density Estimation. Theory, Practice and Visualization. Wiley.Google Scholar
Serfling, R. (1980) Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics. Wiley.Google Scholar
Shorack, G.R. (1974) Random means. Annals of Statistics 2, 661675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vyazilov, A.E. (1999) The residual empirical distribution function in GARCH(1,1) and its application in hypothesis testing. Russian Mathematical Surveys 54, 856857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar