Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9b74x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-06T16:12:04.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Multiple Decision Theory Analysis of Structural Stability in Regression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2010

B.P.M. McCabe
B.P.M. McCabe*
Affiliation:
School of Economic Studies, University of Leeds
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using the theory of multiple decisions, this paper conducts an analysis of structural stability in location and variance for the linear-regression model. It shows that both cusum and cusum-of-squares techniques are in certain senses optimal. However, the same tests are optimal for changes in location and variance. It is also shown that there is an inherent contradiction between the use of recursive residuals and cusum techniques. The concept of a localized Bayes rule is introduced.

Information

Type
Brief Report
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , December 1988 , pp. 499 - 508
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Anderson, T.W. The choice of degree of a polynomial regression as a multiple decision problem. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33 (1962): 255–265.Google Scholar
2. Anderson, G. & Mizon, G.. Parameter constancy tests: old and new. Discussion Papers in Economics and Econometrics, 83325. University of Southampton, 1983.Google Scholar
3. Breusch, T.S. & Pagan, A.R.. A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica 47 (1979): 1287–1294.Google Scholar
4. Brown, R.L., Durbin, J., & Evans, J.M.. Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B 37 (1975): 149–192.Google Scholar
5. Dufour, J.M. Recursive stability analysis of linear-regression relationships. Journal of Econometrics 19 (1982): 31–76.10.1016/0304-4076(82)90050-1Google Scholar
6. Ferguson, T.S. Mathematical statistics. New York: Academic Press, 1967.Google Scholar
7. Ferguson, T.S. On the rejection of outliers. Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1 (1961): 253–287.Google Scholar
8. King, M.L. Robust tests for spherical symmetry and their application to least-squares regression. Annals of Statistics 8 (1980): 1265–1271.10.1214/aos/1176345199Google Scholar
9. King, M.L. & Hillier, G.H.. Locally best invariant tests of the error covariance matrix of the linear-regression model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B 47 (1985): 98–102.Google Scholar
10. Leybourne, S.L. and McCabe, B.P.M.. On the distribution of some test statistics for coefficient constancy. Biometrika 75 (1988): forthcoming.Google Scholar
11. McAleer, M. & Fisher, G.. Testing separate regression models subject to specification error. Journal of Econometrics 19 (1982): 125–145.Google Scholar
12. McCabe, B.P.M. Testing regression models for random effects outliers under elliptical symmetry. Economic Letters 25 (1987): 47–49.Google Scholar
13. Schweder, T. Some “optimal” methods to detect structural shift or outliers in regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association 71 (1976); 491–501.Google Scholar