Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:18:32.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimal Prediction Under Asymmetric Loss

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Peter F. Christoffersen
Affiliation:
Internationa/ Monetary Fund
Francis X. Diebold
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania and NBER

Abstract

Prediction problems involving asymmetric loss functions arise routinely in many fields, yet the theory of optimal prediction under asymmetric loss is not well developed. We study the optimal prediction problem under general loss structures and characterize the optimal predictor. We compute the optimal predictor analytically in two leading tractable cases and show how to compute it numerically in less tractable cases. A key theme is that the conditionally optimal forecast is biased under asymmetric loss and that the conditionally optimal amount of bias is time varying in general and depends on higher order conditional moments. Thus, for example, volatility dynamics (e.g., GARCH effects) are relevant for optimal point prediction under asymmetric loss. More generally, even for models with linear conditionalmean structure, the optimal point predictor is in general nonlinear under asymmetric loss, which provides a link with the broader nonlinear time series literature.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amemiya, T. (1985) Advanced Econometrics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Christoffersen, P.F. & Diebold, F.X. (1994) Optimal Prediction under Asymmetric Loss. National Bureau of Economic Research Technical Working paper 167, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Christoffersen, P.F. & Diebold, F.X. (1996) Further results on forecasting and model selection under asymmetric loss. Journal of Applied Econometrics 11, 561572.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diebold, F.X. & Mariano, R.S. (1995) Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13, 253265.Google Scholar
Granger, C.W.J. (1969) Prediction with a generalized cost of error function. Operational Research Quarterly 20, 199207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, C.W.J. & Newbold, P. (1986) Forecasting Economic Time Series, 2nd ed.Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, B.E. (1994) Autoregressive conditional density estimation. International Economic Review 35, 705730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, L.P., Sargent, T.J., & Tallarini, T.D. (1993) Pessimism, Neurosis, and Feelings about Risk in General Equilibrium. Manuscript, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. (1996) Econometric model determination. Econometrica 64, 763812.Google Scholar
Stockman, A.C. (1987) Economic theory and exchange rate forecasts. International Journal of Forecasting 3, 315.Google Scholar
Varian, H. (1974) A Bayesian approach to real estate assessment. In Feinberg, S.E. & Zellner, A. (eds.), Studies in Bayesian Econometrics and Statistics in Honor of LJ. Savage, pp. 195208. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Weiss, A.A. (1996) Estimating time series models using the relevant cost function. Journal of Applied Econometrics 11, 539560.Google Scholar
Whittle, P. (1979) Why predict? Prediction as an adjunct to action. In Anderson, O.D. (ed.), Forecasting, pp. 177183. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Whittle, P. (1990) Risk-Sensitive Optimal Control. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Zellner, A. (1986) Bayesian estimation and prediction using asymmetric loss functions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81, 446451.Google Scholar