Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:24:41.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perspectives in the History of Econometrics: A Review Essay of R. J. Epstein: A History of Econometrics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Mary S. Morgan
Mary S. Morgan
Affiliation:
London School of Economics
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Only in the last few years has the history of econometrics become established as an accepted field of research, with its own doctoral students and sessions at professional meetings. Yet, the first written histories of econometrics appeared as far back as the 1950s, when Carl Christ [4] reviewed the first 20 years' econometric work of the Cowles Commission and George Stigler [37] surveyed the early econometric analyses of consumer demand. Contributions in the intervening years have been sparse, with historical accounts such as Stigler [38], Humphrey [23], and Cargill [3] providing helpful landmarks, and additional insights coming from papers such as Gold-berger [16] and Griliches [17]. Now we have a new monograph on the history of the Cowles Commission by Hildreth [22], a number of journal articles, and Roy Epstein's 1987 book, A History of Econometrics, as further contributions to this small but rapidly expanding field.

Type
Articles
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 151 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Aldrich, J.Autonomy. Oxford Economic Papers 41 (1989): 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Andvig, J.C.Ragnar Frisch and the great depression. Oslo: Norsk Utenrikspolitisk Institutt, 1985.Google Scholar
3.Cargill, T.F.Early applications of spectral methods to economic time series. History of Political Economy 6 (1974): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Christ, C.F. History of the Cowles Commission 1932–1952. In Economic theory and measurement. Chicago: Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, 1952, pp. 3–65.Google Scholar
5.Christ, C.F.Early progress in estimating quantitative economic relationships in America. American Economic Review 75(6) (1985): 39–52.Google Scholar
6.Cowles Commission Monograph 10. Statistical inference in dynamic economic models. (Koopmans, T.C., ed.). New York: Wiley, 1950.Google Scholar
7.Cowles Commission Monograph 14. Studies in econometric method. (Hood, W.C. & Koopmans, T.C., eds.). New York: Wiley, 1953.Google Scholar
8.Epstein, R.J.The fall of OLS in structural estimation. Oxford Economic Papers 41 (1989): 94–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Frisch, R. Pitfalls in the statistical construction of demand and supply curves. Veröffentlichungen der Frankfurter Gesellschaft für Konjunkturforschung, Leipzig: Hans Buske, 1933.Google Scholar
10.Frisch, R. Propagation and impulse problems in dynamic economics. In Economic essays in honour of Custav Cassel. London: Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1933, pp. 171–205.Google Scholar
11.Frisch, R. Report of a paper: An ideal programme for macrodynamic studies. Econometrica 5 (1937): 365–366.Google Scholar
12.Frisch, R. Statistical versus theoretical relations in economic macrodynamics. League of Nations memorandum. Geneva: League of Nations, 1938.Google Scholar
13.Frisch, R. & Waugh, F.V.. Partial time regressions as compared with individual trends. Econometrica 1 (1933): 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Gilbert, C. The development of econometrics in Britain since 1945. D. Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford, 1988.Google Scholar
15.Gilbert, C.LSE and the British approach to time series econometrics. Oxford Economic Papers 41 (1989): 108–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Goldberger, A.S.Structural equation methods in the social sciences. Econometrica 40 (1972): 979–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Griliches, Z.Errors in variables and other unobservables. Econometrica 42 (1974): 971–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Haavelmo, T. On the theory and measurement of economic relations. Mimeo, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1941. (Published as Haavelmo (1944), see [20].)Google Scholar
19.Haavelmo, T.The statistical implications of a system of simultaneous equations. Econometrica 11 (1943): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Haavelmo, T.The probability approach in econometrics. Econometrica 12(suppl.) (1944).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Hendry, D.F. & Morgan, M.S.. A re-analysis of confluence analysis. Oxford Economic Papers 41 (1989): 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Hildreth, C.The Cowles Commission in Chicago, 1939–1955, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Humphrey, T.M.Empirical tests of the quantity theory of money in the United States 1900–1930. History of Political Economy 5 (1973): 285–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Ksergaard, N.The earliest history of econometrics: some neglected Danish contributions. History of Political Economy 16 (1984): 437–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Klein, J.L. The conceptual development of population and variation as foundations of econometric analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, City of London Polytechnic, 1986.Google Scholar
26.McCarthy, M. Econometrics after the Cowles Commission work and The Brookings project: successes, mistakes and possible new directions. Unpublished paper, 1987.Google Scholar
27.Magnus, J.R. & Morgan, M.S.. The ET interview: Professor J. Tinbergen. Econometric Theory 3 (1987): 117–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Malinvaud, E.Econometric methodology at the Cowles Commission: rise and maturity. Econometric Theory 4 (1988): 188–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Mann, H.B. & Wald, A.. On the statistical treatment of linear stochastic difference equations. Econometrica 11 (1943): 173–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Moore, H.L.Economic cycles-their law and cause. New York: Macmillan, 1914.Google Scholar
31.Moore, H.L.Generating economic cycles. New York: Macmillan, 1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Morgan, M.S. The history of econometric thought: analysis of the main problems of relating economic theory to data in the first half of the twentieth century. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, 1984. Published as The History of Econometric Ideas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
33.Morgan, M.S. Statistics without probability and Haavelmo's revolution in econometrics. In Krüger, L., Gigerenzer, G., & Morgan, M.S. (eds.). The probabilistic revolution Vol 2: ideas in the sciences. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1987, pp. 171–197.Google Scholar
34.Morgan, M.S. The stamping out of process analysis from econometrics. Prepared for a Symposium on the History and Philosophy of Econometrics, Duke University, November 1987.Google Scholar
35.Morgan, M.S. Finding a satisfactory empirical model. In de Marchi, N. (ed.), The Popperian legacy in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Qin, D.Formalization of identification theory. Oxford Economic Papers 41 (1989): 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Stigler, G.J.The early history of empirical studies of consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy 62 (1954): 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Stigler, G.J.Henry L. Moore and statistical economics. Econometrica 30 (1962): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39.Tinbergen, J.Bestimmung und Deutung von Angebotskurven. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 1 (1930): 669–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40.Tinbergen, J.An econometric approach to business cycle problems. Paris: Hermann & Cie, 1937.Google Scholar
41.Tinbergen, J.Statistical testing of business-cycle theories, Vol II: business cycles in the United States of America, 1919–1932. Geneva: League of Nations, 1939.Google Scholar
42.Working, E.J.What do statistical “demand curves” show? Quarterly Journal of Economics 41 (1927): 212–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43.Wold, H.O.A case study of interdependent versus causal chain systems. Revue de L'Institut International de Statistique 26 (1958): 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44.Wold, H.O.Causality and econometrics. Econometrica 22 (1954): 162–177; Simon, H.A. Causality and econometrics: comment; and Wold, H.O. Causality and econometrics: reply. Econometrica 23 (1955): 193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar