Article contents
Contractualism and risk preferences
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 October 2020
Abstract
I evaluate two contractualist approaches to the ethics of risk: mutual constraint and the probabilistic, ex ante approach. After explaining how these approaches address problems in earlier interpretations of contractualism, I object that they fail to respond to diverse risk preferences in populations. Some people could reasonably reject the risk thresholds associated with these approaches. A strategy for addressing this objection is considering individual risk preferences, similar to those Buchak discusses concerning expected-utility approaches to risk. I defend the risk-preferences-adjusted (RISPREAD) contractualist approach, which calculates a population’s average risk preference and permits risk thresholds below that preference, only.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
- 2
- Cited by