Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:44:40.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu. Princeton University Press, 2007, 371 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Matthias Klaes
Matthias Klaes*
Affiliation:
Keele University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 25 , Issue 3: Economics and Philosophy on Ambiguity Aversion , November 2009 , pp. 389 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arce, D. G. 2007. Is agency theory self-activating? Economic Inquiry 45: 708–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicchieri, C. 1993. Rationality and coordination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bloor, D. 1976. Knowledge and social imagery. Vol. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bloor, D. 2004. Sociology of scientific knowledge. In Handbook of epistemology, ed. Niiniluoto, I., Sintonen, M., and Woleński, J., 919–62. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M., ed. 1998. The laws of the markets. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Callon, M., Millo, Y. and Muniesa, F., eds. 2007. Market devices. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. and Klaes, M. 2005. The principle of institutional direction: Coase's regulatory critique of intervention. Cambridge Journal of Economics 29: 263–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1950. British broadcasting: A study in monopoly. London: Longmans and Green.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1959. The Federal Communications Commission. Journal of Law and Economics 2: 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. and Klaes, M. 2003. Reflexivity: curse or cure? Journal of Economic Methodology 10: 329–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T. D. and Regan, D. T.. 1996. Do economists make bad citizens? Journal of Economic Perspectives 10: 187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauci, B. and Baumgartner, T. 1992. The endogenous economist: unique-model and multiple-model representation of reality. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 51: 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunberg, E. and Modigliani, F. 1954. The predictability of social events. Journal of Political Economy 62: 465–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, F. 2001. Building economic machines: the FCC auctions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32: 453–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazlett, T. W. 1998. Assigning property rights to radio spectrum users: Why did FCC license auctions take 67 years? Journal of Law and Economics 41: 529–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessig, L. 1999. Code, and other laws of cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. 2006. An Engine, no a camera. How financial models shape markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muth, J. F. 1961. Rational expectations and the theory of price movements. Econometrica 29: 315–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, J. F. 1950. The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18: 155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, A. 1984. Constructing quarks. A sociological history of particle physics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1980. The economist as preacher. Center for the Study of the Economy and the State Working Paper Series No. 011.Google Scholar