Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:29:08.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Futility of Multiple Utility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2009

Timothy J. Brennan
Timothy J. Brennan
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comments
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , April 1993 , pp. 155 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akerlof, G. 1982. “Labor Contracts as a Partial Gift Exchange.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 97:543–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, T. 1983. “Economic Efficiency and Broadcast Content Regulation.” Federal Communications Law Journal 35:117–38.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. 1987. “Academic Disciplines and Representative Advocacy.” Business and Professional Ethics Journal 6:32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, T. 1989. “A Methodological Assessment of Multiple Utility Frameworks.” Economics and Philosophy 5:189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, T. 1990. “Voluntary Exchange and Economic Claims.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 7:105–24.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. 1991. “The Trouble With Norms.” In Koford and Miller (1991), pp. 85–94.Google Scholar
Coughlin, R. (editor). 1991. Morality, Rationality, and Efficiency: New Perspectives on Socio-Economics. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Elster, J. 1985. “Weakness of Will and the Free-Rider Problem.” Economics and Philosophy 1:231–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, A. 1986. “The Case for a Multiple Utility Conception.” Economics and Philosophy 2:159–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, A. 1988. The Moral Dimension. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. 1991. “The Moral Dimension in Policy Analysis.” In Coughlin (1991), pp. 375–86.Google Scholar
Frank, R. 1987. “If Homo Economicus Could Choose a Conscience, Would He?” American Economic Review 77:593–604.Google Scholar
Frank, R. 1988. Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Frank, R. 1991. “Social Forces in the Workplace.” In Koford and Miller (1991), pp. 151–79.Google Scholar
Frankfort, H. 1971. “Weakness of Will and the Concept of a Person.” Journal of Philosophy 68:5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. 1953. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In Essays in Positive Economics, pp. 3–43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. 1986. Well Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griffith, W. and Goldfarb, R.. 1991. “Amending the Economist's ‘Rational Egoist’ Model to Include Moral Values and Norms, Part 2: Alternative Solutions.” In Koford and Miller (1991), pp. 59–84.Google Scholar
Koford, K., and Miller, J. (editors). 1991. Social Norms and Economic Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, M. 1993. “The Utility of Multiple Utility: A Comment on Brennan.” Economics and Philosophy 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinvaud, E. 1977. The Theory of Unemployment Reconsidered. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Noddings, N. 1984. Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Radin, M. 1987. “Market Inalienability.” Harvard Law Review 100:1849–1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagoff, M. 1986. “Values and Preferences.” Ethics 96:301–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A., 1980/1981. “Plural Utility.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 80:193–215.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. 1971. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Wible, J. 1991. “Maximization, Replication and Economic Rationality of Positive Economic Science.” Review of Political Economy 3:164–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar