Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:16:40.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Blüte und Frucht. Morphologie, Entwicklungsgeschichte, Phylogenie, Funktion, Ökologie. 2nd, fully revised edition. Peter Leins & Claudia Erbar. Stuttgart: E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Nägele u. Obermiller). 2008. xii + 412 pp., 258 illustrations, 3 tables. ISBN 978 3 510660 46 9. €49 (hardback).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

L. Ronse De Craene
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Edinburgh Journal of Botany , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , July 2009 , pp. 363 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2003). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141(4): 399–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endress , P. K . (1999). Symmetry in flowers – diversity and evolution. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 160(6) (Suppl.): S3–S23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hufford , L. D . (1990). Androecial development and the problem of monophyly of Loasaceae. Canad. J. Bot. 68: 402–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronse De Craene , L. P. & Smets , E. F. (2001). Staminodes: their morphological and evolutionary significance. Bot. Rev. 67: 351–402.Google Scholar
Walker-Larsen , J. & Harder , L. D. (2000). The evolution of staminodes in angiosperms: patterns of stamen reduction, loss, and functional re-invention. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1367–1384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed