Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T10:44:10.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A REINSTATEMENT, RECIRCUMSCRIPTION AND REVISION OF THE GENUS DONELLA (SAPOTACEAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2016

B. Mackinder*
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, Scotland, UK.
D. J. Harris
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, Scotland, UK.
L. Gautier
Affiliation:
Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques de la Ville de Genève and Laboratoire de Systématique et Biodiversité, University of Geneva, Case Postale 60, CH-1292 Chambésy/GE, Switzerland.
*
E-mail for correspondence: B.Mackinder@rbge.org.uk
Get access

Abstract

The genus Donella Pierre ex Baill. is here reinstated and Austrogambeya Aubrév. is, for the first time, placed in synonymy based on the findings of recent combined molecular and morphological studies. Seventeen species are recognised, two of which, Donella ranirisonii L.Gaut. & Mackinder and D. humbertii Capuron ex Mackinder & L.Gaut., from Madagascar, are described here for the first time. The flowers of Donella ambrensis and D. delphinensis are described here for the first time, as are the fruits of D. guereliana. Two keys, to the species of Madagascar and tropical Africa, respectively, are presented. Ten species are endemic to Madagascar, six species are endemic to tropical Africa and one, Donella lanceolata, occurs from Madagascar to the Solomon Islands. For each species, the accepted name with synonymy is given, followed by a morphological description. Geographical range and details of habitat are provided, with taxonomic and/or nomenclatural notes as appropriate. Distribution maps are presented for all species, and preliminary conservation assessments are made. Five species qualify for a category of Threat, and three further species are assessed as Near Threatened. An index to species and a list of exsiccatae are included.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (2016) 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aubréville, A. (1961). Notes sur les Sapotacées de l'Afrique équatoriale. Notul. Syst. (Paris) 16: 233252.Google Scholar
Aubréville, A. (1964). Sapotacées. Adansonia, Mémoire 1: 1157.Google Scholar
Aubréville, A. (1974). Flore de Madagascar et des Comores. 164e famille. Sapotacées. Paris: Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle.Google Scholar
Australia's Virtual Herbarium (no date). Electronic database. Online. Available: http://avh.chah.org.au Google Scholar
Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A. W., de la Torre, J. & Scott, B. (2011). Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: Smith, V., Penev, L. (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. ZooKeys 150: 117126.Google Scholar
Baehni, C. (1965). Mémoires sur les Sapotacées. 3. Inventaire des genres. Boissiera 11: 1262.Google Scholar
Bartish, I. V., Swenson, U., Munzinger, J. & Anderberg, A. A. (2005). Phylogenetic relationships among New Caledonian Sapotaceae (Ericales): molecular evidence for generic polyphyly and repeated dispersal. Amer. J. Bot. 92 (4): 667673.Google Scholar
Bartish, I. V., Antonelli, A., Richardson, J. E. & Swenson, U. (2011). Vicariance or long-distance dispersal: historical biogeography of the pantropical subfamily Chrysophylloideae (Sapotaceae). J. Biogeogr. 38 (1): 177190.Google Scholar
Beentje, H. (2010). The Kew Plant Glossary, an Illustrated Dictionary of Plant Terms. Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
Bokdam, J. (1977). Seedling morphology of some Sapotaceae and its taxonomical significance. Meded. Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen, Nederland 77 (20): 184.Google Scholar
Chevalier, A. (1917a). Mém 8 Novitates floræ africanæ. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 54 (Suppl. 3): 266.Google Scholar
Chevalier, A. (1917b). La Forêt et les Bois du Gabon. Vég. Utiles Afrique Trop. Franç. 9: 270.Google Scholar
de Candolle, A. P. (1844). Prodr. (A. P. de Candolle) 8: 1684.Google Scholar
Gautier, L. (2003). Sapotaceae. In: Goodman, S. M. & Benstead, J. P. (eds) The Natural History of Madagascar, pp. 342346. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Govaerts, R., Frodin, D. G. & Pennington, T. D. (2001). World Checklist and Bibliography of Sapotaceae. Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
Harris, D. J. (2002). The vascular plants of the Dzanga-Sangha Reserve, Central African Republic. Scripta Bot. Belg. 23:1274.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, W. D. (1995). Ecological profiles of Ghanaian forest trees. Tropical Forest Papers, no. 29. Oxford: Nuffield Press.Google Scholar
Hemsley, J. H. (1968). Sapotaceae. In: Milne-Redhead, E. & Polhill, R. M. (eds) Flora of Tropical East Africa. Crown Agents for Overseas Governments and Administration.Google Scholar
Hickey, L. (1979). A revised classification of the architecture of Dichotyledonous leaves. In: Metcalf, G. R. & Chalk, L. (eds) Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
IUCN (2001). IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, version 3.1, 2nd edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: International Union for Conservation of Nature.Google Scholar
JSTOR Global Plants (no date). Electronic database. Online. Available: https://plants.jstor.org/ Google Scholar
Leaf Architecture Working Group (1999). Manual of Leaf Architecture – Morphological Description and Categorization of Dicotyledonous and Net-veined Monocotyledonous Angiosperms. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Lecomte, P. H. (1928). Deux Sapotacées de Madagascar et d'Afrique. Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat. (Paris) 34: 355356.Google Scholar
McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Buck, W. R., Demoulin, V., Greuter, W., Hawksworth, D. L., Herendeen, P. S., Knapp, S., Marhold, K., Prado, J., Prud'homme van Reine, W. F., Smith, G. F., Wiersema, J. H. & Turland, N. J. (eds and comps) (2012). International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Melbourne Code), Adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011. Regnum Vegetabile 154. Oberreifenberg: Koeltz Botanical Books.Google Scholar
Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (no date). Electronic database. Online. Available: https://science.mnhn.fr/institution/mnhn/item/search Google Scholar
National Herbarium of the Netherlands (no date). Electronic database. Online. Available: bioportal.naturalis.nl Google Scholar
Pennington, T. D. (1991). The Genera of Sapotaceae. Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, New York: New York Botanical Garden.Google Scholar
Peterson, J. J., Parker, I. M. & Potter, D. (2012). Origins and close relatives of a semi-domesticated neotropical fruit tree: Chrysophyllum cainito (Sapotaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 99 (3): 585604.Google Scholar
Pierre, L. (1891). Notes Botaniques: Sapotacées. Paris. Published in part: 168.Google Scholar
Schatz, G. E. (2001). Generic Tree Flora of Madagascar. Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
Swenson, U. & Anderberg, A. A. (2005). Phylogeny, character evolution, and classification of Sapotaceae (Ericales). Cladistics 21 (2): 101130.Google Scholar
Swenson, U., Richardson, J. E. & Bartish, I. V. (2008). Multigene phylogeny of the pantropical subfamily Chrysophylloideae (Sapotaceae): evidence of generic polyphyly and extensive morphological homoplasy. Cladistics 24 (6): 10061031.Google Scholar
Triono, T., Brown, A. H. D., West, J. G. & Crisp, M. D. (2007). A phylogeny of Pouteria (Sapotaceae) from Malesia and Australasia. Austral. Syst. Bot. 20 (2): 107118.Google Scholar
Vink, W. (1958). Revision of the Sapotaceae of the Malaysian Area in a wider sense XIII, Chrysophyllum L. Blumea 9 (1): 2174.Google Scholar
White, C. T. (1950). Ligneous plants from the Solomon Islands and New Guinea. J. Arnold Arbor. 31: 105129.Google Scholar