Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:49:49.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Numerical taxonomic study on Turkish Lathyrus (Leguminoseae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2010

M. Dogan
Affiliation:
M.E.T.U., Department of Biology Education, 06531 Ankara, Turkey
A. Kence
Affiliation:
M.E.T.U., Department of Biology, 06531 Ankara, Turkey
C. Tigin
Affiliation:
M.E.T.U., Department of Biology, 06531 Ankara, Turkey
Get access

Abstract

This study examines whether a satisfactory classification of Turkish Lathyrus species can be obtained from phenetic clustering based on external vegetative and floral morphological characters of herbarium specimens. Forty morphological characters for each species of the genus Lathyrus L. were scored and the data subjected to numerical taxonomic analyses. The results of this study suggest that there are basically nine sections (Orobus, Lathyrostylis, Aphaca, Nissolia, Orobon, Gorgonia, Clymenum, Cicercula and Lathyrus) which can be grouped under two subgenera, namely subgenus Lathyrus and subgenus Orobus, as far as the material belonging to 54 of the 58 species cited in Flora of Turkey allows. Sect. Gorgonia Dogan is described.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, S. I. (1965). Revision of the Genus Lathyrus L. from W Pakistan Biologia No 2: 110.Google Scholar
Baker, J. G. (1876). Leguminosae in Hooker, J. D. Flora of British India, Vol. 2. London.Google Scholar
Bässler, M. (1966). Die Stellung des Subgen. Orobus (L.) Baker in der Gattung Lathyrus L. und seine systematische Gliederung. Feddes Repertorium 72: 6997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bässler, M. (1973). Revision der eurasiatischen Arten von Lathyrus L. Sect. Orobus (L.) Gren. & Godr. Feddes Repertorium 84:329447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bässler, M. (1981). Revision von Lathyrus L. Sect. Lathyrostylis (Griseb.) Bässler (Fabaceae). Feddes Repertorium 92: 172254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boissier, E. (1872). Orobus and Lathyrus in Flora Orientalis 2: 599622. Geneva & Basel.Google Scholar
Burkart, A. (1935). Revision de las especies de Lathyrus de la Republica Argentina. Rev. Fac. Agr. Buenos Aires 8:41128.Google Scholar
Burkart, A. (1942). Neuvas contributiones a la sistematica de las especies sudamericanas de Lathyrus. Darwiniana 6:930.Google Scholar
Chittenden, F. G. (1951). The Royal Horticulural Society Dictionary Of Gardening 3: 11321134. Oxford.Google Scholar
Czefronova, Z, (1971), Conspectus systematis generis Lathyrus L. Novitates Syste-maticae Plantarum Vascularium (Leningrad) 8:191201.Google Scholar
Davis, P. H. (1970). Lathyrus in Davis, P. H. (ed.) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 3: 328369. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Godron, D. A. (1848). Lathyrus in Grenier, J. C. M. & Godron, D. A., Flore de France 1: 478492. Paris & Besançon.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, C. L. (1952). A revision of the North American species of Lathyrus. University of Washington Publications in Biology 5.Google Scholar
Kupicha, F. K. (1983). The infrageneric structure of Lathyrus. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 41: 209244.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1753), Species Plantarum. Vol. 1. Holmiae.Google Scholar
Rohlf, F. J. (1986). Numerical taxonomy system of programs for the IBM-PC microcomputer.Google Scholar
Simola, L. K. (1968). Comparative studies on number of leaflets, venation and epider-mal structure in the genu s Lathyrus. Canadian Journal of Botany 46:7184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneath, P. H. A. & Sokal, R. R. (1973). Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco.Google Scholar
Wyte, R.O., Nilsson-Leissner, G. & Trumble, H.C. (1953). Legumes in Agriculture. FAO, Rome.CrossRefGoogle Scholar