Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T13:59:00.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A REVISION OF CYTISUS SECTIONS ALBURNOIDES, SPARTOPSIS AND VERZINUM (GENISTEAE, FABACEAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2013

G. Auvray  and
V. Malecot
G. Auvray
Affiliation:
INRA Angers-Nantes, Centre d’Angers, UMR GenHort, 42 rue George Morel, 49071 Beaucouzé, France. E-mail: gaelle.auvray@hotmail.fr
V. Malecot
Affiliation:
Agrocampus-Ouest, Centre d’Angers, UMR GenHort, 2 rue André Le Nôtre, 49045 Angers, France.
Get access

Abstract

Cytisus sections Alburnoides DC., Spartopsis Dumort. and Verzinum (Raf.) Talavera (tribe Genisteae, Fabaceae) are revised. These comprise 10 species of the genus, of which two species are recognised in Cytisus section Alburnoides, four in Cytisus section Spartopsis (of which two species are divided into subspecies), and four in Cytisus section Verzinum (one with two subspecies). Three new combinations are made: Cytisus ardoinoi subsp. sauzeanus, C. grandiflorus subsp. maurus and C. scoparius subsp. insularis. Keys to the sections and to the species within each section are given. All taxa are described. Conservation assessments are made.

Keywords

CytisusGenisteaetaxonomic revision
Type
Articles
Information
Edinburgh Journal of Botany , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 61 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiton, W. (1789). Hortus Kewensis, or, a catalogue of the plants cultivated in the Royal Botanic Garden at Kew. London: Printed for George Nicol, bookseller of His Majesty.Google Scholar
Anonymous (1982). Arrêté du 20 janvier 1982 relatif à la liste des espèces végétales protégées sur l’ensemble du territoire national. Journal Officiel du 13 mai 1982.Google Scholar
Auvray, G. & Malecot, V. (2011). Revised lectotypification of Spartium scoparium L. (Fabaceae). Taxon 60: 1480–1481.Google Scholar
Bisby, F. A. (1981). Genisteae (Adams.) Benth. (1865). In: Polhill, R. M. & Raven, P. H. (eds) Advances in Legume Systematics 1, pp. 409–425. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
Bossard, C. C. (1991). The role of habitat disturbance, seed predation and ant dispersal on establishment of the exotic shrub Cytisus scoparius in California. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 126: 1–13.Google Scholar
Briquet, J. (1894). Etudes sur les Cytises des Alpes Maritimes. Genève et Bale: Georg & Co.Google Scholar
Brummitt, R. K. (1999). Report of the Committee for Spermatophyta: 48. Taxon 48: 359–371.Google Scholar
Buchheim, G. (1965). A Bibliographical Account of L’Héritier’s Stirpes Novae. Huntia 2: 29–58.Google Scholar
Burdet, H. M., Charpin, A. & Jacquemoud, F. (1988). Types Nomenclaturaux des Taxa Ibériques Décrits par Boissier ou Reuter. Genève: Conservatoire et jardin botaniques de Genève.Google Scholar
Canto, P. & Rivas-Martinez, S. (2003 [‘2002’]). Cytisus oromediterraneus y Cytisus balansae (Cytiseae, Leguminosae) dos especies europeas. Lazaroa 23: 3–6.Google Scholar
Cristofolini, G. & Conte, L. (2002). Phylogenetic patterns and endemism genesis in Cytisus Desf. (Leguminosae–Cytiseae) and related genera. Israel J. Pl. Sci. 50: 37–50.Google Scholar
Cristofolini, G. & Troia, A. (2006). A reassessment of the sections of the genus Cytisus Desf. (Cytiseae, Leguminosae). Taxon 55(3): 733–746.Google Scholar
Cubas, P., Tahiri, H. & Pardo, C. (2001). Karyological and taxonomic notes on Cytisus Desf. Sect. Spartopsis Dumort. and Sect. Alburnoides DC. (Genisteae, Leguminosae) from the Iberian Peninsula and Morocco. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 135(1): 43–50.Google Scholar
Cubas, P., Pardo, C. & Tahiri, H. (2002). Molecular approach to the phylogeny and systematics of Cytisus (Leguminosae) and related genera based on nucleotide sequences of nrDNA (ITS region) and cpDNA (trnL-trnF intergenic spacer). Pl. Syst. Evol. 233(3/4): 223–242.Google Scholar
Cubas, P., Pardo, C. & Tahiri, H. (2006). Morphological convergence or lineage sorting? The case of Cytisus purgans (Leguminosae). Taxon 55(3): 695–704.Google Scholar
De Candolle, A. (1825). Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis, Sive Enumeratio Contracta Ordinum Generum Specierumque Plantarum huc usque Cognitarium, Juxta Methodi Naturalis, Normas Digesta. Paris: Sumptibus Sociorum Treuttel et Würtz.Google Scholar
De Jussieu, A. L. (1789). Genera Plantarum Secundum Ordines Naturales Disposita: Juxta Methodum in Horto Regio Parisiensi Exaratam. Paris: Apud Viduam Herissant, typographum.Google Scholar
Dumortier, B. C. (1827). Florula Belgica, Operis Majoris Prodromus. Tournai: Tornaci Nerviorum.Google Scholar
Earl, D. P. & Rich, T. C. G. (2001). Prostrate broom (Cytisus scoparius subsp. maritimus) at Tubby’s Head, St Agnes, Cornwall (v.c. 1). Bot. Corn. 10: 18–20.Google Scholar
Forissier, R. (1973). Recherches cytotaxonomiques préliminaires sur les genres Lembotropis, Cytisus, Chamaecytisus, Genista et Chamaespartium. Bull. Soc. Neuchâteloise Sci. Nat. 96: 51–65.Google Scholar
Fougrach, H., Badri, W. & Malki, M. (2007). Flore vasculaire rare et menacée du massif de Tazzeka (région de Taza, Maroc). Bull. Inst. Sci. Univ. Mohammed V, Sci. Vie 29: 1–10.Google Scholar
Frodin, D. G. & Heywood, V. H. (1968). Cytisus. In: Tutin, T. G., Heywood, V. H., Burges, N. A., Moore, D. M., Valentine, D. H., Walters, S. M. & Webb, D. A. (eds) Flora Europaea, Rosaceae to Umbelliferae. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grisebach, A. H. R. (1843). Spicilegium Florae Rumelicae et Bithynicae Exhibens Synopsis Plantarum quas in aest. 1839 Legit Auctor A. Grisebach. Braunschweig: Fridericus Vieweg et filius.Google Scholar
Holmgren, P. K., Holmgren, N. H. & Barnett, L. C. (1990). Index Herbariorum. Part I: The Herbaria of the World. New York: New York Botanical Garden.Google Scholar
Holubova-Klaskova, A. (1964). Bemerkungen zur Gliederung der Gattung Cytisus L. s. l. Acta Univ. Carol.-Biol. 2: 1–24.Google Scholar
Horjales, M. (1974). Numeros cromosomicos en genisteas. Anales Inst. Bot. Cavanilles 31(1): 175–178.Google Scholar
IUCN (2001). IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN Species Survival Commission, and Cambridge, UK: IUCN.Google Scholar
Koch, K. (1873). Dendrologie. Bäume, Sträucher und Halbsträucher, welche in Mittel- und Nord-Europa im Freien Kultivirt Werden. Kritisch Beleuchtet von Karl Koch. Erlangen: F. Enke.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J.-B. (1778). Flore Françoise, ou Description Succinte de Toutes les Plantes qui Croissent Naturellement en France, Disposée Selon une Nouvelle Méthode d’Analyse à Laquelle on a Joint la Citation de Leurs Vertus Les Moins Equivoques en Médecine, et de Leur Utilité dans les Arts. Paris: L’Imprimerie royale.Google Scholar
Lewis, G., Schrire, B., Mackinder, B. & Lock, M. (eds) (2005). Legumes of the World. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1753). Species Plantarum. Stockholm: Impensis Laurentii Salvii.Google Scholar
Lopez Gonzalez, G. (1996). Proposal to conserve the name Genista purgans (Leguminosae) with a conserved type. Taxon 45: 699–700.Google Scholar
Lopez Gonzalez, G. & Jarvis, C. E. (1984). Algunas novedades relativas a las plantas de Linneo. Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 40: 341–344.Google Scholar
Maire, R. (1987). Flore de l’Afrique du Nord. Paris: Editions Lechevalier.Google Scholar
Malecot, V., Macquaire-Le Pocreau, N., Auvray, G. & Kapusta, V. (2009). Polymorphic ITS as a tool to identify hybrids and their parents in cultivated Genisteae (Fabaceae). Acta Hort. 836: 91–96.Google Scholar
McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Burdet, H. M., Demoulin, V., Hawksworth, D. L., Marhold, K. et al. . (eds) (2006). International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Vienna Code) adopted by the Seventeenth International Botanical Congress, Vienna, Austria, July 2005. Ruggell: A. R. G. Gantner Verlag KG [Regnum Veg. vol. 146].Google Scholar
Moench, C. (1797). Einleitung zur Pflanzenkunde. Freiberg: Akademischen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Moreno, J. C. (2008). Lista Roja 2008 de la Flora Vascular Espanola. Madrid: Ministerio de medio ambiente y medio rural y marino.Google Scholar
Ortiz, S., Pulgar, I. & Iglesias, I. (2001). A new species of Cytisus Desf. (Fabaceae) from islands off the west coast of Galicia (north-west Iberian Peninsula). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 136(3): 339–344.Google Scholar
Ortiz, S., Pulgar, I. & Iglesias, I. (2004). Cytisus insularis. In: Banares, A., Blanca, G., Guëmes, J., Moreno, J. C. & Ortiz, S. (eds) Atlas y Libro Rojo de la Flora Vascular Amenazada de Espana, pp. 666–667. Madrid: Direccion General de Conservacion de la Naturaleza.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, F. (1908). Classification des genêts et des cytises. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. 9(7): 129–320.Google Scholar
Polhill, R. M., Bisby, F. A., Cristofolini, G., Frodin, D. G. & Meikle, R. D. (1978). Proposal to conserve and retypify the name Cytisus (Leguminosae). Taxon 27: 556–559.Google Scholar
Rameau, J.-C., Mansion, D., Dume, G. & Gauberville, C. (2008). Flore Forestière Française Tome 3, Région Méditerranéenne. Paris: Institut pour le Développement Forestier.Google Scholar
Rehder, A. (1949). Bibliography of the Cultivated Trees and Shrubs Hardy in the Cooler Temperate Regions of the Northern Hemisphere. Boston, MA: The Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University.Google Scholar
Rolfe, R. A. (1910). Cytisus × dallimorei and heredity. Gard. Chron. ser. 3, 47: 397.Google Scholar
Rothmaler, W. (1944). Die Gliederung der Gattung Cytisus. Feddes Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 53: 137–150.Google Scholar
Rouy, G. (1897). Flore de France ou Description des Plantes qui Croissent Spontanément en France, en Corse et en Alsace-Lorraine. La Rochelle: Société des Sciences naturelles de la Charente-Inférieure.Google Scholar
Sampaio, G. A. (1913). Lista das Especies Representadas no Herbario Portugues. Porto: Gabinete de Botanica da Faculdade de Sciências do Porto.Google Scholar
Sanudo, A. (1979). Chromosome variability in the Genisteae (Adans.) Benth. (Leguminosae). Webbia 34(1): 363–408.Google Scholar
Skalicka, A. (1968). Taxonomische revision der Gattung Lembotropis Griseb. Acta Univ. Carol.-Biol. 1968: 263–277.Google Scholar
Spach, E. (1844). Revisio generis Genista. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. 3(2): 237–279.Google Scholar
Steffen, A. (1929). Schöne Cytisus für den Garten. Mitt. Deutsch. Dendrol. Ges. 41: 379–380.Google Scholar
Tahiri, H. & Ouyahya, A. (2007). Cytisus. In: Fennane, M., Ibn Tattou, M., Ouyahya, A. & El Oualidi, J. (eds) Flore Pratique du Maroc. Rabat: Institut scientifique, Université Mohammed V.Google Scholar
Talavera, S. & Gibbs, P. (1997). Cytisus purgans auct. (Leguminosae–Papilionoideae) comprises four distinct species. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 125(4): 331–342.Google Scholar
Talavera, S. & Salgueiro, J. S. (1999). Sobre el tratamiento de la tribu Cytiseae Bercht. & J.Presl (Papilioideae, Leguminosae) en “Flora Iberica”. Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 57(1): 200–218.Google Scholar
Talavera, S., Aedo, C., Castroviejo, S., Romero Zarco, C., Saez, L., Salgueiro, F. J. & Velayos, M. (1999). Flora Iberica: Plantas Vasculares de la Peninsula Iberica e Islas Baleares. Madrid: Servicio de Publicaciones del CSIC (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas).Google Scholar
Turland, N. J. & Jarvis, C. E. (1997). Typification of Linnean specific and varietal names in the Leguminosae (Fabaceae). Taxon 46: 457–485.Google Scholar
Vicioso, C. (1955). Genisteas Espanolas. Madrid: Ministerio de Agricultura.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, B. M. (1988). Broom (Cytisus scoparius) at Barrington Tops, New South Wales. Austral. Geogr. Stud. 26: 239–248.Google Scholar
Williams, P. A. (1981). Aspects of the ecology of broom (Cytisus scoparius) in Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand J. Bot. 19: 31–43.Google Scholar
Willkomm, M. & Lange, J. (1880). Prodromus Florae Hispanicae Seu Synopsis Methodica Omnium Plantarum in Hispania Sponte Nascentium Vel Frequentius Cultarum quae Innotuerunt. Stuttgart: Sumtibus E. Schweizerbart (E. Koch).Google Scholar
Wimmer, C. F. H. (1832). Flora von Schlesien: Handbuch zur bestimmung und kenntniss der phanerogamischen gewächse dieser provinz, nebst einer gedrängten einleitung in die pflanzenkunde. Berlin: A. Rücker.Google Scholar
Zielinski, J. (1975). The genus Cytisus s. l. in Poland. Arbor. Kornickie 20: 47–111.Google Scholar
Zouhar, K. (2005). Cytisus scoparius, Cytisus striatus. In: Fire effects information system [Online]. Available at: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory.Google Scholar