Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T01:02:38.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVISION OF NEOTROPICAL CALYCOBOLUS AND PORANA (CONVOLVULACEAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

G. W. Staples  and
D. F. Austin
G. W. Staples
Affiliation:
The Herbarium, Singapore Botanic Garden, Cluny Road, Singapore 259569. E-mail: george_staples@nparks.gov.sg
D. F. Austin
Affiliation:
Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum, 2021 N. Kinney Rd., Tucson, AZ 85743, USA.
Get access

Abstract

The neotropical species of Calycobolus (Convolvulaceae) are revised. Three species are recognised. A fourth species is here recognised as belonging to the genus Porana. All four species are described, keys for identification are provided, selected characters are illustrated, distributions are mapped, and an index to numbered herbarium specimens examined is included to aid herbarium curation.

Keywords

CalycobolusDufoureaneotropicsPoranaPrevosteataxonomy
Type
Articles
Information
Edinburgh Journal of Botany , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 133 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, D. F. (1970). Notes and typification for two species of Bonamia (Convolvulaceae). Taxon 19: 906–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, D. F. (1971). An addition and nomenclatural change in the tribe Poraneae (Convolvulaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 58: 243–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, D. F. (1973). The American Erycibeae (Convolvulaceae): Maripa, Dicranostyles, and Lysiostyles I. Systematics. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 60: 306–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, D. F. (1998). Parallel and convergent evolution in the Convolvulaceae. In: Mathews, P. & Sivadasan, M. (eds) Biodiversity and Taxonomy of Flowering Plants, pp. 201–234. Calicut: Mentor Books.Google Scholar
Austin, D. F. & Cavalcante, P. B. (1982). Convolvuláceas da Amazônia. Publ. Avulsas Mus. Paraense Emilio Goeldi 36: 1–134.Google Scholar
Deroin, T. (2001). Fasc. 171. Convolvulaceae. In: Flore de Madagascar et des Comores. Paris: Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle.Google Scholar
Hallier, H. (1898). Dipteropeltis, eine neue Poraneengattung aus Kamerun. Jahrb. Hamb. Wiss. Anst. 16: 3–7.Google Scholar
HarvardUniversityHerbariaIndexofBotanists (2007–2008). http://asaweb.huh.harvard.edu:8080/databases/botanist_index.html (accessed November 2007, July 2008).Google Scholar
Heine, H. (1963a). The genus Calycobolus Willd. ex Roem. & Schult. (Convolvulaceae) in Africa. Kew Bull. 16: 387–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, H. (1963b). Convolvulaceae. In: Hepper, F. N. (ed.) Flora of West Tropical Africa, 2nd edition, 2: 335–352. London: Crown Agents for Oversea Governments.Google Scholar
Hepper, F. N. (1968). A standard citation of microfiches. Taxon 17: 604.Google Scholar
Humboldt, A., Bonpland, A. & Kunth, C. S. (1819). Nova Genera et Species Plantarum, vol. 3, Convolvulaceae, pp. 94–124. Paris: Sumptibus librariae graeco-latini-germanicae.Google Scholar
Index Herbariorum (2007). http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/ (accessed 2007–2008).Google Scholar
Lebrun, J.-P. & Stork, A. (1997). Énumération des plantes à fleurs d'Afrique tropical, vol. IV. Genève: Editions des Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques, Ville de Genève.Google Scholar
Lejoly, J. & Lisowski, S. (1985). Le genre Calycobolus Willd. (Convolvulaceae) en Afrique tropicale. Bull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Belgique 55: 27–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lejoly, J. & Lisowski, S. (1993). Les Convolvulaceae dans la flore d'Afrique Centrale (Zaïre, Rwanda, Burundi). Fragm. Florist. Geobot. 38: 351–400.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. L. (1971). Pollen differences between Stylisma and Bonamia (Convolvulaceae). Brittonia 23: 331–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacBryde, J. F. (1959). Convolvulaceae. In: MacBryde, J. F. (ed.) Flora of Peru. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser., vol. 13, part 5, no. 1: 455–536. Chicago.Google Scholar
McVaugh, R. (1955). The American collections of Humboldt and Bonpland, as described in the Systema Vegetabilium of Roemer and Schultes. Taxon 4: 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myint, T. & Ward, D. B. (1968). A taxonomic revision of the genus Bonamia (Convolvulaceae). Phytologia 17: 121–239.Google Scholar
O'Donell, C. A. (1960). Notas sobre Convolvulaceae americanas. Lilloa 30: 39–69.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. J. & Schultes, J. (1819). Systema Vegetabilium, vol. 5. Stuttgardtiae: J. G. Cottae.Google Scholar
Stafleu, F. & Cowan, R. S. (1979). Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edition, vol. II. Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema.Google Scholar
Stafleu, F. & Cowan, R. S. (1983). Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edition, vol. IV. Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema.Google Scholar
Staples, G. W. (1987). A revision of Porana Burman f. (Convolvulaceae) and an evaluation of the tribe Poraneae. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Staples, G. W. (2006). Revision of the Asiatic Poraneae (Convolvulaceae) – Cordisepalum, Dinetus, Duperreya, Porana, Poranopsis, and Tridynamia. Blumea 51: 403–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefanovic, S., Krueger, L. & Olmstead, R. G. (2002). Monophyly of the Convolvulaceae and circumscription of their major lineages based on DNA sequences of multiple chloroplast loci. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 1510–1522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stefanovic, S., Austin, D. F. & Olmstead, R. G. (2003). Classification of Convolvulaceae: a phylogenetic approach. Syst. Bot. 28: 791–806.Google Scholar
Van Ooststroom, S. J. (1933). Neue und kritische Convolvulaceae aus Peru. Recueil Trav. Bot. Néerl. 30: 30–49 [reprinted in Meded. Bot. Mus. Herb. Rijks Univ. Utrecht no. 7].Google Scholar