Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:30:26.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A revision of Papaver L. Sects. Pilosa Prantl and Pseudopilosa M. Popov Ex Günther (Papaveraceae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2010

J. W. Kadereit
Get access

Abstract

A revision of the perennial Papaver L. sects. Pilosa Prantl and Pseudopilosa M. Popov ex Giinther is presented. Sect. Pilosa is considered to contain one species with five subspecies: P. pilosum Sibth. & Sm. subsp. pilosum, subsp. glabrisepalum Kadereit subsp. now, subsp. strictum (Boiss. & Balansa) Wendt ex Kadereit comb, et slat, now, subsp. spicatum (Boiss. & Balansa) Wendt ex Kadereit comb, et star, now and subsp. sparsipilosum (Boiss.) Kadereit comb, et stat. now The species is distributed in W Turkey. Sect. Pseudopilosa contains three species with five subspecies: P. rupifragum Boiss. & Reut., P. allanticum (Ball) Coss. subsp. atlanticum and subsp. mesatlanticum (Maire) Kadereit comb, et stat. now, P. lateritium K. Koch subsp. lateritium and subsp. inonanthum (Trautv.) Kadereit comb, et stat. now Whereas P. rupifragum and P. atlanticum are found in S Spain and NW Africa, P. lateritium grows in NE Anatolia, Georgia and the Caucasus Mts.

Keywords

BiogeographyPapaver sect. PilosaPapaver sect. Pseudopilosaphylogeny
Type
Articles
Information
Edinburgh Journal of Botany , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , November 1996 , pp. 285 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bernhardi, J. J. (1833). Über den Character und die Verwandtschaft der Papaveraceen und Fumariaceen. Linnaea 8: 401–477.Google Scholar
Boissier, E. (1867). Flora Orientalis 1. Basel.Google Scholar
Boissier, E. (1888). Flora Orientalis, Supplementum. Basel.Google Scholar
Castroviejo, S., Laínz, M., López González, G., Montserrat, P., Muñoz Garmendia, F., Paiva, J. & Villar, L. (1986). Flora Iberica. Vol. I. Madrid.Google Scholar
Cullen, J. (1965a). Materials for a Flora of Turkey: X. Papaveraceae, Papaver sect. Pilosa. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 26: 178–181.Google Scholar
Cullen, J. (1965b). Papaveraceae. In: Davis, P. H. (ed.) Flora of Turkey 1: 213–248. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Davis, P. H. (1971). Distribution patterns in Anatolia with particular reference to endemism. In: Davis, P. H, Harper, P. C & Hedge, I. C (eds) Plant Life of South-West Asia: 15–27. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Davis, P. H & Hedge, I. C. (1971). Floristic links between N.W. Africa and S.W. Asia. Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien 75: 43–57.Google Scholar
Elkan, L. (1839). Tentamen Monographiae Generis Papaver. Berlin.Google Scholar
Fedde, F. (1909). Papaveraceae-Hypecoideae et Papaveraceae-Papaveroideae. In: Engler, A. (ed.) Das Pflanzenreich 4, 104: 1–430. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Goldblatt, P. (1974). Biosystematic studies in Papaver section Oxytona. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 61: 264–296.Google Scholar
Günther, K.-F. (1975). Beiträge zur Morphologie und Verbreitung der Papaveraceae. 2. Teil: Die Wuchsformen der Papavereae, Eschscholzieae und Platystemonoideae. Flora 164: 393–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jork, K. B & Kadereit, J. W. (1995). Molecular phylogeny of the Old World representatives of Papaveraceae subf. Papaveroideae with special emphasis on the genus Meconopsis Vig. In: Jensen U. & Kadereit J. W. (eds) Systematics and Evolution of the Ranunculiflorae. Pl. Syst. Evol, Suppl. 9: 171–180.Google Scholar
Kadereit, J. W. (1988). Sectional affinities and geographical distribution in the genus Papaver L. (Papaveraceae). Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 63: 139–156.Google Scholar
Kadereit, J. W. (1993). A revision of Papaver sect. Meconidium. Edinb. J. Bot. 50: 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadereit, J. W & Sytsma, K. J. (1992). Disassembling Papaver: A restriction site analysis of chloroplast DNA. Nordic J. Bot. 12: 205–217.Google Scholar
Maire, R. & Quézel, P. (1964). Flore de l'Afrique du Nord XI. Paris.Google Scholar
Maire, R. (1945). Contribution à l'étude de la Flore de l'Afrique du Nord. No 34. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afrique N. 36: 86.Google Scholar
Markgraf, F. (1958). Papaveraceae. In: Hegi, G. (ed.) Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa IV 1/2: 15–49. (2. Aufl.). München.Google Scholar
Novák, J. (1983). K taxonomii sekce Pilosa Rodu Papaver. Sborn. Vysoké Skoly Zemed. V Praze-Fakulta Agronomicka. Rada A 38: 43–51.Google Scholar
Öztekin, A., Baytop, A., Hutin, M., Foucher, J. P , Hocquemiller, R. & Cave, A. (1985). Comparison of chemical and botanical studies of Turkish Papaver belonging to section Pilosa. Planta Med. (Stuttgart) (1985): 431–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popov, M. (1937). Papaveraceae. In: Komarov, V. L (ed.) Flora S.S.S.R. VII: 621. Mosqua & Leningrad.Google Scholar
Popov, M. (1970). Papaver L. section Pseudo-Pilosa. In: Komarov, V. L. (ed.) Flora of the U.S.S.R. VII (Translated from Russian): 474–476. Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Prantl, K. & Kündig, J. (1891). Papaveraceae. In: Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (eds) Die natüurlichen Pfianzenfamilien III/2: 142. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schwarz, O. (1944). Zwei neue südwestanatolische Papaver der sect. Pilosa. Feddes Repert. 53: 76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spach, E. (1834). Histoire Naturelle des Vegetaux Phanerogams 7. Paris.Google Scholar
Turrill, W. B. (1959). Papaver heldreichii. Curtis's botanical magazine 172: Tab. 331.Google Scholar
Vent, W., Randel, U. & Wendt, N. (1968). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Sippenstruktur von Papaver atlanticum (Ball) Coss. und Papaver rupifragum Boiss. et Reut. Feddes Repert. 11: 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viguier, L. G. A. (1814). Histoire Naturelle, Medicinale et Economique des Pavots et des Argemones. Montpellier.Google Scholar
Wendt, N. (1976). Beiträge zur Sippenstrukturforschung an der Gattung Papaver L., Sektion Pilosa Prantl, Sektion Pseudopilosa Popov ex Günther und Sektion Oxytona Bernh. Ph.D. Dissertation. Berlin.Google Scholar