Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:31:30.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Systematics of the genus Cyclopia Vent. (Fabaceae, Podalyrieae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2010

A. L. Schutte
Get access

Abstract

Cyclopia is a papilionaceous genus endemic to the Western and Eastern Cape Provinces of South Africa. The 23 species recognized within the genus have rather subtle differences, but characters of the leaves, bracts and calyces, as well as the adaptations to survive recurrent fires, are useful to distinguish between the species. Variations in morphological, cytological and chemical characters are discussed. A phylogenetic analysis of 21 characters by means of cladistic methodology produced a cladogram with five distinct groups. These are described as sections in the taxonomic part of the paper. One new species, Cyclopia alopecuroides A.L. Schutte, is described. The nomenclature, synonymy and typification of the taxa are presented, as well as full descriptions, illustrations and distribution maps.

Keywords

ChemistryCyclopia alopecuroidesCyclopia sect. AequalisCyclopia sect. CyclopiaCyclopia sect. MarsupiumCyclopia sect. PraegnansCyclopia sect. TruncataemorphologyphylogenySouth Africa
Type
Articles
Information
Edinburgh Journal of Botany , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , July 1997 , pp. 125 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

, Anonymous (1993). Heuningbostee moet kommersieel verbou word. Landbounuus 26 April 1993.Google Scholar
Bentham, G. (1837). Commentationes de Leguminosarum Generibus. Vienna: Sollinger.Google Scholar
Bentham, G. (1839). De leguminosarum generibus. Ann. Wiener Mus. Naturgesch. 2: 62–142.Google Scholar
Bentham, G. (1843). Enumeration of Leguminosae, indigenous to southern Asia, and central and southern Africa. Lond. J. Bot. 2: 423–594.Google Scholar
De Nysschen, A. M.Van Wyk, B-E., Van Heerden, F. R. & Schutte, A. L. (1996). The major phenolic compounds in the leaves of Cyclopia species (honeybush tea). Biochem. Syst. Ecol 24: 243–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ecklon, C. F. & Zeyher, K. L. P. (1836). Enumeratio plantarum africae australis extratropicae. Part 2. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Farris, J. S. (1988). Hennig 86 reference. Version 1.5.Google Scholar
Goldblatt, P. (1981a). Cytology and the phylogeny of Leguminosae. In: Polhill, R. M. & Raven, P. H. (eds) Advances in legume systematics 2: 427–463. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
Goldblatt, P. (1981b). Chromosome numbers in legumes II. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 68: 551–557.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. H.. (1862). Leguminosae. In: Harvey, W. H. & Sonder, O. W. (eds) Flora Capensis. Vol. 2. Dublin: Hodges, Smith & Co.Google Scholar
Hofmeyr, P. & Phillips, E. P. (1922). The genus Cyclopia Vent. Bothalia 1: 105–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmgren, P. K., Keuken, W. & Schonfield, E. K. (1981). Index Herbariorum. Ed. 7. Regnum Veg. 106.Google Scholar
James, S. (1984). Lignotubers and burls – Their structure, function and ecological significance in Mediterranean ecosystems. Bot. Rev. 50: 225–266.Google Scholar
Kay, Q. O. N. (1987). Ultraviolet patterning and ultraviolet-absorbing pigments in flowers of Leguminosae. In: Stirton, C. H. (ed.) Advances in legume systematics 3: 317–354. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
Kies, P. (1951). Revision of the genus Cyclopia and notes on some other sources of bush tea. Bothalia 6: 161–176.Google Scholar
Le Maitre, D. C. & Midgley, J. J. (1992). Plant reproductive ecology. In: Cowling, R. M. (ed.) The Ecology of Fynbos – Nutrients, fire and diversity, pp. 135–174. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levyns, M. R.. (1934). A revision of Lobostemon Lehm., and a discussion of the species problem. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 49: 393–451.Google Scholar
Linder, H. P. & Vlok, J. H. J. (1991). The morphology, taxonomy and evolution of Rhodochoma (Restionaceae). PI. Syst. Evol. 175: 139–160.Google Scholar
Meyer, E. H. F. (1836). Commentariorum deplantis africae australioris 1 (1). Leipzig: Leopoldum Voss.Google Scholar
Midgley, J. J.. (1987). The derivation, utility and implications of a divergence index for the fynbos genus Leucadendron (Proteaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 95: 137–152.Google Scholar
Polhill, R. M. (1976). Genisteae (Adans.) Benth. and related tribes (Leguminosae). Bot. Syst. 1: 143–368.Google Scholar
Polhill, R. M. (1981a). Tribe 27. Podalyrieae Benth. In: Polhill, R. M. & Raven, P. H. (eds) Advances in legume systematics 1: 396–397. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
Polhill, R. M. (1981b). Tribe 28. Liparieae (Benth.) Hutch. In: Polhill, R. M. & Raven, P. H. (eds) Advances in legume systematics 1: 398. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
Radford, A. E.. (1986). Fundamentals of Plant Systematics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Schutte, A. L.. (1992). Cyclopia squamosa (Podalyrieae), a new species from the southwestern Cape Province. Bothalia 22: 190–192.Google Scholar
Schutte, A. L.. (1995). A taxonomic study of the tribes Podalyrieae and Liparieae (Fabaceae). Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Rand Afrikaans University, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
Schutte, A. L. & Van Wyk, B-E. (1993). The reinstatement of the genus Xiphotheca (Fabaceae). Taxon 42: 43–49.Google Scholar
Schutte, A. L. & Van Wyk, B-E. (1994). A reappraisal of the generic status of Liparia and Priestleya (Fabaceae). Taxon 43: 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutte, A. L. & Van Wyk, B-E. (1997). Evolutionary relationships in the Podalyrieae and Liparieae based on morphological, cytological and chemical evidence. PI. Syst. Evol. 197 (in press).Google Scholar
Schutte, A. L., Vlok, J. H. J. & Van Wyk, B-E. (1995). Fire-survival strategy – A character of taxonomic, ecological and evolutionary importance in fynbos legumes. PI. Syst. Evol. 195: 243–259.Google Scholar
Stearn, W. T.. (1970). Ventenat's ”Decas generum novorum” (1808). Regnum Veg. 71: 342–352.Google Scholar
Stirton, C. H. (1981). Notes on the taxonomy of Rubus in southern Africa. Bothalia 13: 331–332.Google Scholar
Van Wyk, B-E. & Schutte, A. L. (1994). Stirtonia, a new genus of the tribe Podalyrieae (Leguminosae) from South Africa. Nord. J. Bot. 14: 319–325.Google Scholar
Vanwyk, B-E. & Schutte, A. L. (1995a). Phylogenetic relationships in the tribes Podalyrieae, Liparieae and Crotalarieae. In: Crisp, M. D. & Doyle, J. J. (eds) Advances in legume systematics 7: 283–308. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
Van Wyk, B-E. & Schutte, A. L. (1995b). Stirtonanthus, a new name for Stirtonia (Leguminosae, tribe Podalyrieae). Nord. J. Bot. 15: 67.Google Scholar
Ventenat, E. P. (1808). Decas generum novorum aut parum cognitorum. Paris.Google Scholar
Viljoen, B. (1994). Honeybush tea for extra income. Farmer's Weekly: 04 March 1994.Google Scholar
Walpers, G. (1839). Animadversiones criticae in Leguminosas capenses. Linnaea 13: 449–543.Google Scholar
Watt, J. M. & Breyer-Brandwijk, M. G. (1962). Medicinal and Poisonous Plants of Southern and Eastern Africa. London: Livingstone Ltd.Google Scholar
Wells, P. V. (1969). The relation between mode of reproduction and extent of speciation in woody genera of the California chaparral. Evol. 23: 264–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed