Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:02:53.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The taxonomic status of Tilia dasystyla in Crimea, Ukraine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2010

C. D. Pigott
Affiliation:
Greenbank, Cartmel, Grange-over-Sands, Cumbria LA11 7SQ, UK.
B. Francis
Affiliation:
Centre for Applied Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YF, UK.
Get access

Abstract

Nine populations of Tilia dasystyla Steven (Tiliaceae) in the Crimean mountains (Krymskiye Gory), including the type locality at Kastel Dag, were studied in the field and sampled by collection of herbarium specimens. This material was compared with specimens referred to Tilia hegonifolia Steven collected in Crimea, the Caucasus and Iran. Measurements or scores of 21 morphological characters made on the dried material were analysed by principal components analysis and logistic regression. These analyses demonstrated that the majority of trees could be correctly allocated to either Crimea or the Caucasus and Iran on the basis of the shape of their leaves and the area of their bracts. In addition there are differences of leaf and bract texture and bract colour which can be observed in fresh material. Chromosome counts showed that Crimean trees and one Caucasian tree are tetraploid (2n = 164). It is proposed that the Crimean, Caucasian and Iranian trees be treated as a single species with at least two subspecies: Tilia dasystyla Steven subsp. dasystyla from Crimea and T. dasystyla Steven subsp. caucasica (V. Engl.) Pigott from the Caucasus and Iran.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Browicz, K. (1981). In: Rechinger. K. H. Flora des Iranischen Hochlandes und der Umrahmenden Gebirge. Graz: Akademische Druck.Google Scholar
Collett, D. (1991). Modelling Binary Data. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Candolle, A. P. (1813). Catalogus Plantarum Horti Botanici Monspeliensis. Montpellier and Paris: J. Martel.Google Scholar
Engler, V. (1909). Monographie der Gattung Tilia. Breslau: W. G. Korn.Google Scholar
Francis, B., Green, M. & Payne, C. (1993). The GLIM4 Manual. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Krzanowski, W. J. (1988). Principles of Multivariate Analysis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Loria, M. L. (1967) Sistematicheskii obzor lip Kavkaza. Bot. Zurn. SSSR 52: 17891791.Google Scholar
Maleev, V. P. (1949). Tilia. In Komarov, V. L., Schischkin, B. K. & Bobrov, E. G.Flora of the USSR. Moscow and Leningrad: Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Pigott, C. D. & Pigott, S. (1993). Water as a determinant of the distribution of trees at the boundary of the Mediterranean zone. J. Ecol. 81: 557566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehder, A. (1923). New species, varieties and combinations from the herbarium and collections of the Arnold Arboretum. J. Arnold Arbor. 4: 246253.Google Scholar
Ruprecht, F. J. (1869). Flora Caucasi. 1: Tilia. Mém. Acad. Imp. Scl., Saint Pétersbourg: Seconde Pt. Sci. Nat. 15: 252259.Google Scholar
Steven, C. (1832). Observationes in plantas rossicas et descriptiones specierum novarum. Bjull. Moskovsk Obšč. Isp. Prir., Otd. Biol. 4: 259 264.Google Scholar
Steven, C. (1856). Enumeratio plantarum phancrogamarum in Tauria sponte crescentium. Bjull. Moskovsk Obšč. Isp. Prir., Otd. Biol. 29: 277334.Google Scholar
Tseplyaev, V. P. (1965). The Forests of the USSR. Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translation.Google Scholar
Yaltirik, F. (1967). Tilia. In: Davis, P. H.Flora of Turkey. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar