Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:11:52.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taxonomy and nomenclature of Rubus Ulmifolius and Rubus Sanctus (Rosaceae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2010

E. Monasterio-Huelin  and
H. E. Webert
Get access

Abstract

The taxonomy and nomenclature of the most common, closely related brambles of the Mediterranean area are treated. These include R. ulmifolius Schott (R. discolor, R. rustieanus, R. inermis) and Rubus sanctus Schreber (R. sanguineus, R. dalmatinus, R. anatolicus) (Rosaceae). The species are illustrated, the types are given, and variability, synonymy and distribution is indicated. Fifteen names are lectotypified.

Keywords

BrambleslectotypificationsMediterranean flora
Type
Articles
Information
Edinburgh Journal of Botany , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , November 1996 , pp. 311 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beek, A. Van De (1979). Taxonomie en nomenclatuur van de koebraam. Gorteria 9: 204–208.Google Scholar
Boulay, N. (1898). Les Rubus de la flore française. Rubi Discolores. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 45: 497–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edees, E. S. & Newton, A. (1988). Brambles of the British Isles. London: The Ray Society.Google Scholar
Focke, W. O. (1877). Synopsis Ruborum Germaniae. Bremen.Google Scholar
Focke, W. O. (1902). Rubus L. In: Ascherson, P. F.& Graebner, K. O., Synopsis der mitteleuropäischen Flora 6: 440–560. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Focke, W. O. (1910–1914). Species Ruborum 1–3. Stuttgart. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Genevier, G. (1868). Essai monographique sur les Rubus du bassin de la Loire. Mem. Soc. Acad. Maine Loire 24: 1–346.Google Scholar
Kerner, A. (1872). Novae plantarum species. Ber. Naturwiss.-Mediz. Vereines Innsbruck 2: 124–173.Google Scholar
Legrain, J. (1958). Rubus L. In: Robyns, W., Flore générate de Belgique (Spermatophytes) 3(1): 10–152. Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Malbranche, M. (1879). De l'espèce dans le genre Rubus, et en particulier dans le type Rubus rusticanus Merc. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 26: 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monasterio-Huelin, E. (1993). Rubi Discolores de la Península Ibérica. Candollea 48: 61–82.Google Scholar
Schreber, J. C. D. (1766). Icones et Desciptiones Plantarum. Decas i. Halae.Google Scholar
Sennen, F. (1928). Plantes d'Espagne. Diagnoses et comentaires. Bol. Soc. Ibér. Ci. Nat. 26: 114–198. [467].Google Scholar
Sennen, F. (1936). Diagnoses des nouxeautés parues dans les exsiccata Plantes d'Espagne et du Maroc. Vich.Google Scholar
Sudre, H. (1908–1913). Rubi Europae. Paris.Google Scholar
Weber, H. E. (1986). Rubi Westfalici. Minister: Westf. Mus. Naturkunde.Google Scholar
Weber, H. E. (1995). Rubus L. In: Hegi, G., Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa IV/2A. Ed. 3 (ed. H. E. Weber), pp. 284–595. Berlin etc.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weihe, K. E. A. & Nees Von Esenbeck, C. G. (1822–1827). Rubi Germanici. Elberfeld.Google Scholar