Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:09:02.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A national intervention in teaching phonics: A case study from England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2020

Rhona Stainthorp Open the ORCID record for Rhona Stainthorp [Opens in a new window]
Rhona Stainthorp*
Affiliation:
Institute of Education, University of Reading, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Rhona Stainthorp, Email: r.w.stainthorp@reading.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

At the start of the 21st century, literacy teaching in state primary schools was conducted under a framework guided by a National Literacy Strategy, which recommended a model of reading called ‘The Searchlights Model’. Early on it became clear that rises in performance predicted from adoption of this strategy were not happening. This led to a review of the effective teaching of early reading under the chairmanship of Sir Jim Rose (Rose, 2006). Rose recommended that the Simple View of Reading (Gough & Tunmer, 1986) be adopted as a framework. It also recommended that pupils be taught how to read words in the first instance through the adoption of programs of systematic synthetic phonics. A change in government reinforced this policy and added a national program of early assessment of grapheme-phoneme knowledge. These changes uncovered an important issue: namely that there was no national program for ensuring that teachers had the necessary professional subject knowledge to teach phonics effectively. Steps have been taken to mitigate this. The most recent data from the Progress in International Reading Literacy Studies (PIRLS) 2016 study suggests that England is now beginning to close the achievement gap, with the pupils in the lowest percentiles making the most improvement.

Keywords

phonics teachingword readingliteracy policy
Type
Articles
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , December 2020 , pp. 114 - 122
Copyright
© Australian Psychological Society Ltd, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brooks, G. (1997). Trends in standards of literacy in the United Kingdom, 1948–1996. Paper presented at UK Reading Association conference, University of Manchester, 1997.Google Scholar
Christensen, C.A., & Bowey, J.A. (2005). The efficacy of orthographic rime, grapheme–phoneme correspondence, and implicit phonics approaches to teaching decoding skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 327–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, M.M., & Cazden, C.B. (1990). A Vygotskian interpretation of reading recovery. In Moll, L. (Ed.), Vygotsky and education (pp. 206–222). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J.C. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, A.E., Perry, K.E., Stanovich, K.E., & Stanovich, P.J. (2004). Disciplinary knowledge of K-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 139–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, A.E., Zibulsky, J., & Callahan, M.D. (2009). Starting small: Building preschool teacher knowledge that supports early literacy development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 487–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Education (DfE). (2010). Phonics teaching materials: core criteria and the self-assessment process. Author.Google Scholar
Department for Education (DfE). (2013). English programmes of study: Key stages 1 and 2 National Curriculum in England. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/335186/PRIMARY_national_curriculum_-_English_220714.pdf Google Scholar
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (1998). The national literacy strategy: Framework for teaching. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (1999). Progression in phonics: Materials for whole-class teaching. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2007). Letters and Sounds: Principles and practice of high quality phonics. DFES-00281-2007. London: Author.Google Scholar
Double, K.S., McGrane, J.A., Stiff, J.C., & Hopfenbeck, T.N. (2019). The importance of early phonics improvements for predicting later reading comprehension. British Educational Research Journal, 45, 1220–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earl, L., Fullan, M., Leithwood, K., & Watson, N. (2000). OISE/UT Evaluation of the implementation of the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. Summary: First annual report. Watching & learning. London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
Earl, L., Levin, B., Fullan, M., Leithwood, K. & Watson, N. (2001). Watching and Learning 2. London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
Earl, L., Watson, N., Levin, B., Leithwood, K., Fullan, M., & Torrance, N. (2003). Watching and learning 3: Final report of the external evaluation of England’s National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
Ehri, L.C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 116–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L.C. (1999). Phases of development in learning to read words. In Oakhill, J. & Beard, R. (Eds.), Reading, development and the teaching of reading: A psychological perspective (pp. 79–108). Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Ehri, L.C. (2002). Phases of acquisition in learning to read words and implications for teaching. In Stainthorp, R. & Tomlinson, P. (Eds.), Learning and teaching reading (pp. 7–28). London: British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II.Google Scholar
Flynn, N., Stainthorp, R., Powell, D., & Stuart, M. (2020). Training teachers for phonics and early reading: developing research-informed practice [Manuscript submitted for publication].Google Scholar
Gibb, N. (2017). The importance of a knowledge-based curriculum (Speech]. Department of Education. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nick-gibb-the-importance-of-knowledge-based-education Google Scholar
Gough, P.B., & Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatcher, P.J., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M.J. (2004). Explicit phoneme training combined with phonic reading instruction helps young children at risk of reading failure. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 338–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
House of Commons Education Committee. (2017). Primary assessment. Eleventh report of Session 2016–17. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmeduc/682/682.pdf Google Scholar
Johnston, R.S., & Watson, J. (2005). The effects of synthetic phonics teaching on reading and spelling attainment: A seven-year longitudinal study. Scottish Executive Education Department. https://www.scotland.gov.uk/library5/education/sptrs-00.asp Google Scholar
McGrane, J., Stiff, J., Baird, J-A., Lenkeit, J., & Hoepfenbeck, T. (2017). Progress in Imternational Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS): National report for England. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment.Google Scholar
Moats, L. (1994). Knowledge of language. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 81–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Foy, P., & Drucker, K.T. (2012). PIRLS 2011 international results in reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.Google Scholar
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2017). PIRLS 2016 international results in reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2016/international-results/ Google Scholar
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Gonzalez, E.J., & Kennedy, A.M. (2003). PIRLS 2001 international Report: IEA’s study of reading literacy achievement in primary schools. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.Google Scholar
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Kennedy, A.M., & Foy, P. (2007). PIRLS 2006 International Report: IEA’s progress in international reading literacy study in primary school in 40 countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.Google Scholar
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHHD). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction : reports of the subgroups. NICHHD, National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
Newton, P.E., & Cuff, B.M.P. (2017). Accessibility of the 2016 key stage 2 national curriculum reading test: review of evidence. Ofqual/17/6286/2. www.assets.publishinsebive.gov Google Scholar
Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted). (1996). Teaching of reading in 45 London primary schools. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Roberts, N. (2017). ‘SATs’and primary school assessment [Briefing paper number 07980]. House of Commons Library. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/29359/1/CBP-7980.pdf Google Scholar
Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading final report. London: UK Department for Education and Skills. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/5551/2/report.pdf Google Scholar
Rosen, M. (2012). This summer’s phonics test is not a reading test [Blog post]. http://michaelrosenblog.blogspot.com.au/2012/04/this-summers-phonics-test-is-not.html Google Scholar
Rowe, K. (2005). Teaching reading: National inquiry into the teaching of literacy. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Science and Training. https://research.acer.edu.au/tll_misc/5/ Google Scholar
Stainthorp, R. (2004). W(h)ither phonological awareness? Literate trainee teachers’ lack of stable knowledge about the sound structure of words. Educational Psychology, 24, 753–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UK Literacy Association. (2012). Phonics Screening Check fails a generation of able readers. https://ukla.org/news/story/phonics_screening_check_fails_a_generation_of_able_readers/ Google Scholar
Willows, D.M. (2002). The balanced literacy diet. The School Administrator, 59, 30–33.Google Scholar