Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:09:27.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Australian Validation of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2014

Laura Hopkinson ,
Dianne Watt  and
John Roodenburg
Laura Hopkinson*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Dianne Watt
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
John Roodenburg
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Laura Hopkinson, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia. Email: laura.hopkinson@monash.edu
Get access

Abstract

The Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC) is a developmentally appropriate parent-report measure of the Five Factor Model (FFM) that has been validated in several European languages but only recently in English. The English translation of the HiPIC was evaluated in an Australian context. Parent-rated HiPIC scores were obtained for 202 children (aged 5–14 years) via an online survey. Exploratory factor analysis indicated five factors that appeared reasonably congruent with the original Flemish HiPIC structure, though with some apparent differences particularly in regard to the Extraversion and Benevolence facets. A Procrustes targeted rotation was used to evaluate the congruence with the original Flemish structure. This indicated encouragingly high congruences for the overall model (.97), as well as high facet and factor congruence (.92–.99). These findings can be taken to reflect the robust nature of the HiPIC model, validating the instrument and more specifically confirming its applicability for use in practice and research investigating children's development and wellbeing in Australia.

Keywords

developmental personalityFive-Factor ModelProcrustesmodel comparison
Type
Articles
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , December 2014 , pp. 113 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society Ltd 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allik, J., & McCrae, R.R. (2004). Toward a geography of personality traits: Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35 (1), 13–28. doi:10.1177/0022022103260382Google Scholar
Bleidorn, W., & Ostendorf, F. (2009). Ein Big Five-inventar fur kinder und jugendliche. Die deutsche version des Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC). Diagnostica, 55 (3), 160–173. doi:10.1026/0012-1924.55.3.160Google Scholar
Boag, S. (2008). A brief history of personality and individual differences research in Australia. In Boag, S. (Ed.), Personality down under: Perspectives from Australia (pp. 7–19). Sydney, Australia: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Caspi, A., Roberts, B.W., & Shiner, R.L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913Google Scholar
Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (2011). NEO inventories: Bibliography for the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3), Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R™) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFM-3). Retrieved from http://www4.parinc.com/WebUploads/samplerpts/NEO%20Biblio%202011.pdfGoogle Scholar
Deal, J., Halverson, C., Martin, R., & Baker, S. (2007). The Inventory of Children's Individual Differences: Development and validation of a short version. Journal of Personality, 89 (2), 162–166. doi:10.1080/00223890701468550Google Scholar
Deary, I. (2009). The trait approach to personality. In Corr, P. & Matthews, G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology, (pp. 3–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Clercq, B., Rettew, D., Althoff, R.R., & De Bolle, M. (2012). Childhood personality types: Vulnerability and adaptation over time. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53 (6), 716–722. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02512.xGoogle Scholar
De Fruyt, F., De Bolle, M., McCrae, R.R., Terracciano, A., & Costa, P.T. (2009). Assessing the universal structure of personality in early adolescence: The NEO-PI-R and NEO-PI-3 in 24 cultures. Assessment, 16 (3), 301–311. doi:10.1177/1073191109333760Google Scholar
De Fruyt, F., Mervielde, I., & Van Leeuwen, K. (2002). The consistency of personality type classification across samples and five-factor measures. European Journal of Personality, 16, 57–72. doi:10.1002/per.444Google Scholar
Di Blas, L., Serafino, F., & De Fruyt, F. (2005). La versione italiana del Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC): Contributo alla validazione e taratura. Evalutiva, 82, 41–53.Google Scholar
Friedman, M., Rholes, W.S., Simpson, J.A., Bond, M., Diaz-Loving, R., & Chan, C. (2010). Attachment avoidance and the cultural fit hypothesis: A cross-cultural investigation. Personality Relationships, 17, 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruven, M., von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., & Lero Vie, M. (2013). How universal is the Big Five? Testing the Five-Factor Model of personality variation among forager-farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104 (2), 354–370. doi:10.1037/a0030841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halverson, C.F., Havill, V.L., Deal, J., Baker, S.R., Victor, J.B., Pavlopoulos, V., . . . Wen, L. (2003). Personality structure as derived from parental ratings of free descriptions of children: The Inventory of Child Individual Differences. Journal of Personality, 71, 995–1026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofstee, W.K.B. (2002). The questionnaire construction of personality: Pragmatics of personality assessment. In Braun, H.I., Jackson, D.N. & Wiley, D.E. (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 37–48). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hopwood, C.J., & Donnellan, M.B. (2013). How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14 (3), 332–346. doi:10.1177/1088868310361240Google Scholar
Jacobs, K.E., & Costello, S. (2013). An initial investigation of the Australian adaptation of the Multidimensional Aptitude Battery-II. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 30 (1), 84–102. doi:10.1017/edp.2013.9Google Scholar
John, O.P., Naumann, L.P., & Soto, C.J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In John, O.P., Robins, R.W., & Pervin, L.A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kohnstamm, G.A., Halverson, C.F., Mervielde, I. Jr., & Havill, V.L. (1998). Parental descriptions of child personality: Developmental antecedents of the Big Five? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Laher, S. (2010). Using exploratory factor analysis in personality research: Best-practice recommendations. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36, 1–7.Google Scholar
Lee, K., & Ashton, M.C. (2007). Factory analysis in personality research. In Robins, R.W., Fraley, C. & Krueger, R.F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 424–443). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & ten Berge, J.M.F. (2006). Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology, 2 (2), 57–64. doi:10.1027/1614-1881.2.2.57Google Scholar
McAdams, D., & Pals, J. (2007). The role of theory in personality research. In Robins, R.W., Fraley, C., & Krueger, R.F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 3–20). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
McCrae, R.R. (2011). Personality theories for the 21st century. Teaching of Psychology, 38 (3), 209–214. doi:10.1177/0098628311411785Google Scholar
McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T. Jr. (2008). Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In Boyle, G.J., Matthews, G., & Saklofske, D.H. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment (vol. 1, pp. 273–294). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T. Jr., & Martin, T.A. (2005). The NEO-PI-3: A more readable revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84 (3), 261–270. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_05CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCrae, R.R., Zonderman, A.B., Costa, P.T. Jr., Bond, M.H., & Paunonen, S.V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (3), 552–566. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.552Google Scholar
Markey, P.M., Markey, C.N., & Tinsley, B.J. (2004). Children's behavioral manifestations of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30 (4), 423–432. doi:10.1177/0146167203261886Google Scholar
Martinez, I., Garcia, F., Musitu, G., & Yubero, S. (2012). Family socialization practices: Factor confirmation of the Portugese version of a scale for their measurement. Revista de Psicodidactica, 17 (1), 159–178.Google Scholar
Mervielde, I., & De Fruyt, F. (1999). Construction of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC). In Mervielde, I., Deary, I., De Fruyt, F., & Ostendorf, F. (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe. Proceedings of the Eight European Conference on Personality Psychology (pp. 107–117)., Tilburg, the Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
Mervielde, I., & De Fruyt, F. (2002). Assessing children's traits with the Hierarchial Personality Inventory for Children. In De Raad, B. & Perugini, M. (Eds.), Big five assessment (pp. 129–142). Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.Google Scholar
Ozer, D.J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127Google Scholar
Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Melbourne, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Paunonen, S.V. (1997). On chance and factor congruence following orthogonal Procrustes rotation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 33–59. doi:10.1177/0013164497057001003Google Scholar
Rammstedt, B., Kemper, C.J., & Borg, I. (2013). Correcting Big Five personality measurements for acquiescence: An 18-country cross-cultural study. European Journal of Personality, 27, 71–81. doi:10.1002/per.1894Google Scholar
Rossier, J., Quartier, V., Enescu, R., & Iselin, A. (2007). Validation of the French version of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC): Influence of gender and age on personality traits in 8- to 12-year-olds. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23 (2), 125–132. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.23.2.125Google Scholar
Schwartz, E.S., Chapman, B.P., Duberstein, P.R., Weinstock-Guttman, B., & Benedict, R.H.B. (2011). The NEO-FFI in Multiple Sclerosis: Internal consistency, factorial validity, and correspondence between self and informant reports. Assessment, 18 (1), 39–49. doi:10.1177/1073191110368482Google Scholar
Shiner, R., & Caspi, A. (2003). Personality differences in childhood and adolescence: Measurement, development, and consequences. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44 (1), 2–32.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Tackett, J.L., Kushner, S.C., De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (2013). Delineating personality traits in childhood and adolescence: Associations across measures, temperament, and behavioral problems. Assessment, 20, 738–751. doi:10.1177/1073191113509686Google Scholar
Tackett, J.L., Slobodskaya, H.R., Mar, R.A., Deal, J., Halverson, C.F. Jr., Baker, S.R., . . . Besevegis, E. (2012). The hierarchical structure of childhood personality in five countries: Continuity from early childhood to early adolescence. Journal of Personality, 80 (4), 847–879. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00748.xGoogle Scholar
Vassend, O., & Skrondal, A. (2011). The NEO personality inventory revised (NEO-PI-R): Exploring the measurement structure and variants of the five-factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1300–1304. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.002Google Scholar
Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., & Barbaranelli, C. (2012). Paper-and-pencil and web-based testing: The measurement invariance of the Big Five personality tests in applied settings. Assessment, 19. doi:10.1177/1073191111419091Google Scholar
Vollarth, M.E., Hampson, S.E., & Juliusson, P.B. (2012). Children and eating: Personality and gender are associated with obesogenic food consumption and overweight in 6- to 12-year-olds. Appetite, 58 (3), 1113–1117. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2012.02.056.Google Scholar