Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:49:00.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Predicting behaviour and learning problems at school entry: Examining the utility of a parent-, teacher-, and a child-based scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2012

J. M Reddington*
Affiliation:
Queensland University of Technology, School of Information Systems.jm_reddington@yahoo.co.uk
A. Wheeldon
Affiliation:
Queensland University of Technology, School of Information Systems.
*
*Address for Correspondence Dr. John Reddington M.A.P.S., 23 Wenlock Crescent, Springwood, QLD, 4127
Get access

Abstract

This exploratory study investigated the screening of behaviour, and auditory processing and reading problems in the first school year, employing a sample of 74 children. A teacher behaviour risk index, which included (i) a Behaviour scale (internalising, externalising dimensions and inattention), (ii) a teacher Future Risk estimation, was found to be reliable and a valid predictor of behaviour, together with a parent-based behaviour scale, against the Personal-Social Behaviour sub-scale of the Pupil Rating Scale-Revised. Adding the teacher-based Behaviour scale to the child-based Performance Indicators in the Primary School (PIPS) did not assist reading assessment, however the PIPS scale was confirmed as a valid reading predictor. A teacher-based Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD) scale was significantly correlated to teacher-based Inattention and Behaviour and, with the teacher-based Behaviour scale, significantly predicted reading. On its own it predicted reading better than phonological awareness. It was suggested that child behaviour, CAPD and reading profiles could facilitate joint parent-teacher at-risk referrals in Year 1, including mental health. Assistive listening devices were recommended to aid children's auditory processing. The study needs replication with larger samples.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)