Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:18:08.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remedial Education and Neurological Development: Mallers of Ethical Concern

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

Robert A. Cummins
Robert A. Cummins*
Affiliation:
Victoria College
*
Department of Psychology, Victoria College Toorak Campus, 336 Glenferrie Road, Malvern, Victoria, 3144.
Get access

Extract

Ever since mass education became the norm, with children being required to attend group-teaching in literacy and numeracy, some children have experienced difficulty in coping with this type of instruction. Their reaction frequently manifests as a bored, unruly child who exertsa disruptiveclassroom influence. The issue of what to do with such children has been a persistent problem for their teachers.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , May 1991 , pp. 20 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ayres, A.J. (1964). Perspectives on the neurological bases of reading. In Douglas, M.P. (Ed.), Claremont reading conference: Vol. 28. Claremont, California.Google Scholar
Ayres, A.J. (1979). Sensory integration and the child. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Australian Psychological Society, (1986). Code of professional conduct. Melbourne.Google Scholar
Cummins, R.A. (1988). The neurologically-impaired child: Doman-Delacato techniques reappraised. London: Croom-Helm.Google Scholar
Cummins, R.A. (1991a). Sensory integration and learning disabilities: Ayres’ factor analyses reappraised. Journal of Learning Disabilities, (in press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cummins, R.A. (1991b). A review of the links between perceptual-motor performance and academic competence. (In preparation).Google Scholar
Delacato, CH. (1959). The treatment and prevention of reading problems. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Delacato, C.H. (1977). A new start for the child with reading problems: A manual for parents, (rev. and updated ed.). New York: David McKay Co.Google Scholar
Doman, G. (1964). How to teach your baby to read: The gentle revolution. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Doman, G. (1979) Teach your baby math. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Doman, R.J.; Spitz, E.B.; Zucman, E.; Delacato, CH., & Doman, G. (1960). Children with severe brain injuries: Neurological organization in terms of mobility. Journal of the American Medical Association, 174, 257–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Getman, G.N. (1959). How to develop your child’s intelligence. Luverne, Minnasota: The Announcer Press.Google Scholar
Getman, G.N. (1984). How to develop your child’s intelligence (8th ed.). Irvine, California: Research Publications.Google Scholar
Kephart, N. (1960). The slow learner in the classroom. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
Kephart, N. (1975). The perceptual-motor match. In Cruickshank, W.M. & Hallahan, D.P. (Eds.), Perceptual and learning disabilities in children: Vol. 1, 63. New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Murray-Harvey, R. (1989). Edu-Kinesthetics: Fact or fiction? A preliminary investigation. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 13, 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orton, ST. (1937). Reading, writing and speech problems in children. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Parker, A., & Cutler-Stuart, M. (1986). Switch on your brain. Sydney: Hale and Iremonger.Google Scholar
Stokes, G. (1984). Touch for health.Google Scholar