Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T21:00:01.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ayumi Miura . Middle English verbs of emotion and impersonal constructions: Verb meaning and syntax in diachrony (Oxford Studies in the History of English). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. Pp xvii + 290. ISBN 978-0-19-994715-7.

Review products

Ayumi Miura . Middle English verbs of emotion and impersonal constructions: Verb meaning and syntax in diachrony (Oxford Studies in the History of English). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. Pp xvii + 290. ISBN 978-0-19-994715-7.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2016

Belén Méndez-Naya
Belén Méndez-Naya*
Affiliation:
Department of English and German, Facultade de Filoloxía, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, E-15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spainbelen.mendez@usc.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 155 - 161
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carroll, Ruth. 1997. Cooking verbs in fourteenth-century English: A semantic class and its syntactic behaviour. D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Denison, David. 1990. The Old English impersonals revived. In Adamson, Sylvia M., Law, Vivien A., Vincent, Nigel & Wright, Susan (eds.), Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 65), 111–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Diller, Hans-Jürgen. 2008. A lexical field takes shape: The use of corpora and thesauri in historical semantics. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies 19 (1), 123–40.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Thompson, Sandra. 1980. Transitivity and discourse. Language 56 (2), 251–99.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCawley, Noriko A. 1976. From OE/ME ‘impersonal’ to ‘personal’ constructions: What is a ‘subject-less’ S? In Steever, Sanford B., Walker, Carol A. & Mufwene, Salikoko S. (eds.), Papers form the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax, April 22, 1976, 192–204. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén & López-Couso, María José. 1997. What is really meant by impersonal? On impersonal and related terms. Atlantis 19 (2), 185–92.Google Scholar
Möhlig-Falke, Ruth. 2012. The early English impersonal construction: An analysis of verbal and constructional meaning (Oxford Studies in the History of English). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar