Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-n2sc8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-10T12:10:25.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elaine J. Francis, Gradient acceptability and linguistic theory (Oxford Surveys in Syntax & Morphology). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. Pp. xv + 270. ISBN 9780192898951.

Review products

Elaine J. Francis, Gradient acceptability and linguistic theory (Oxford Surveys in Syntax & Morphology). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. Pp. xv + 270. ISBN 9780192898951.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2023

Tobias Ungerer Open the ORCID record for Tobias Ungerer [Opens in a new window]
Tobias Ungerer*
Affiliation:
Concordia University
*
Department of Psychology Concordia University 7141 Sherbrooke Street West Montreal Quebec H4B 1R6 Canada tobias.ungerer@concordia.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , June 2023 , pp. 430 - 436
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Branigan, Holly P. & Pickering, Martin J.. 2017. An experimental approach to linguistic representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40, e282. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16002028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, Edward, Piantadosi, Steven T. & Fedorenko, Evelina. 2013. Quantitative methods in syntax/semantics research: A response to Sprouse and Almeida (2013). Language and Cognitive Processes 28(3), 229–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2019. Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2020. Analyzing dispersion. In Paquot, Magali & Th. Gries, Stefan (eds.), A practical handbook of corpus linguistics, 99–118. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, Christopher D. 2003. Probabilistic syntax. In Bod, Rens, Hay, Jennifer & Jannedy, Stefanie (eds.), Probabilistic linguistics, 289–341. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2013. Collostructional analysis. In Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 290–306. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar