Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T05:01:45.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Null subjects in Middle English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

GEORGE WALKDEN Open the ORCID record for GEORGE WALKDEN [Opens in a new window]  and
KRISTIAN A. RUSTEN
GEORGE WALKDEN
Affiliation:
School of Arts, Languages and Cultures, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdomgeorge.walkden@manchester.ac.uk
KRISTIAN A. RUSTEN
Affiliation:
Department of English, Bergen University College, Inndalsveien, PO Box 7030, 5020 Bergen, Norwaykristian.andersen.rusten@hib.no
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article investigates the occurrence and distribution of referential null subjects in Middle English. Whereas Modern English is the textbook example of a non-null-subject language, the case has recently been made that Old English permits null subjects to a limited extent, which raises the question of what happens in the middle period. In this article we investigate Middle English using data drawn from the Penn–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English Prose and the new Parsed Corpus of Middle English Poetry, aiming to shed light on the linguistic and extralinguistic factors conditioning the alternation between null and overt subjects. Generalized mixed-effects logistic regression and random forests are used to assess the importance of the variables included. We show that the set of factors at play is similar to that found for Old English, and we document a near-complete disappearance of the null subject option by the end of the Middle English period.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , November 2017 , pp. 439 - 473
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Marianne. 1987. From Old French to the theory of pro-drop. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Cynthia. 1995. Case marking and reanalysis: Grammatical relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Axel, Katrin. 2007. Studies on Old High German syntax: Left sentence periphery, verb placement and verb-second. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berndt, Rolf. 1956. Form und Funktion des Verbums im nördlichen Spätaltenglischen. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bies, Elizabeth A. 1996. Syntax and discourse factors in Early New High German: Evidence for verb-final word order. MA thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta & Sankoff, David. 1974. Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50, 333–55.Google Scholar
Coppess, Emily & Pires, Acrisio. 2013. The residue of syntactic change: Partial pro-drop in Old English. Paper presented at the LSA Summer Institute's Diachronic Syntax Workshop, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Denison, David. 2003. Log(ist)ic and simplistic S-curves. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Motives for language change, 54–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einenkel, Eugen. 1916. Geschichte der englischen Sprache II: Historische Syntax. Strasbourg: Karl J. Trübner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1990. Syntactic change: Toward a theory of historical syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga, van Kemenade, Ans, Koopman, Willem & van der Wurff, Wim. 2000. The syntax of Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van. 2000. A history of English reflexive pronouns: Person, self and interpretability. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van. 2013. Null subjects in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 44, 271–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1990. Understood subjects in English diaries. Multilingua 9, 157–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Ihsane, Tabea. 1999. Subject ellipsis in embedded clauses in English. English Language and Linguistics 3, 117–45.Google Scholar
Håkansson, David. 2013. Null referential subjects in the history of Swedish. Journal of Historical Linguistics 3 (2), 155–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Joseph. 1995. Selections from Early Middle English 1130–1250, part I. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Hornik, Kurt, Strobl, Carolin & Zeileis, Achim. 2015. Party: A laboratory for recursive partytioning. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/party/index.html.Google Scholar
Hulk, Aafke & van Kemenade, Ans. 1995. V2, pro-drop, functional projections and language change. In Battye, Adrian & Roberts, Ian G. (eds.), Clause structure and language change, 227–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenset, Gard B. 2010. A corpus based study of the evolution of there: Statistical analysis and cognitive interpretation. PhD thesis, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2009. Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3, 359–83.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2010. Rbrul manual. Online. www.danielezrajohnson.com/Rbrul_manual.html/.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1, 199–244.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1994. Morphosyntactic variation. In Beals, Katherine (ed.), Proceedings of the 30th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 180–201. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 2001. Syntactic change. In Baltin, Mark & Collins, Chris (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, 699–729. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Diertani, Ariel. 2004. Penn–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English. www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/PPCEME-RELEASE-2/index.html.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Taylor, Ann. 2000. Penn–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English Prose. www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/PPCME2-RELEASE-3/index.html.Google Scholar
Laing, Margaret & Lass, Roger. 2008. The linguistic atlas of Early Middle English, version 3.2. www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/laeme2/laeme2.html.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Angus, Samuels, M. L. & Benskin, Michael. 1986. A linguistic atlas of Late Middle English. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English syntax, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English syntax, part 1: Parts of speech. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Nagucka, Ruta. 1997. Glossal translation in the Lindisfarne Gospel according to Saint Matthew. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 31, 179–201.Google Scholar
Ohlander, Urban. 1943. Omission of the object in English. Studia Neophilologica 16, 105–27.Google Scholar
Ohlander, Urban. 1981. Notes on the non-expression of the subject pronoun in Middle English. Studia Neophilologica 53, 37–49.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan. 1991. Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Pogatscher, Alois. 1901. Unausgedrücktes Subjekt im Altenglischen. Anglia 23, 261–301.Google Scholar
Randall, Beth, Kroch, Anthony & Taylor, Ann. 2005–13. CorpusSearch 2. Online. http://corpussearch.sourceforge.net/.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti, Kytö, Merja, Kahlas-Tarkka, Leena, Kilpiö, Matti, Nevanlinna, Saara, Taavitsainen, Irma, Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 1991. Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/HelsinkiCorpus/.Google Scholar
Rosenkvist, Henrik. 2009. Referential null subjects in Germanic: An overview. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 84, 151–80.Google Scholar
Rusten, Kristian A. 2010. A study of empty referential pronominal subjects in Old English. MA thesis, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Rusten, Kristian A. 2013. Empty referential subjects in Old English prose – a quantitative analysis. English Studies 94 (8), 970–92.Google Scholar
Rusten, Kristian A. 2014. Null referential subjects from Old to early Modern English. In Haugland, Kari E., McCafferty, Kevin & Rusten, Kristian A. (eds.), ‘Ye whom the charms of grammar please’: Studies in English language history in honour of Leiv Egil Breivik, vol. 4, 249–70. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rusten, Kristian A. 2015. A quantitative study of empty referential subjects in Old English prose and poetry. Transactions of the Philological Society 113 (1), 53–75.Google Scholar
Rusten, Kristian A. 2016. Empty referential subjects in Old English. PhD thesis, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David, Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Smith, Eric. 2005. Goldvarb X: A variable rule application for Macintosh and Windows. http://individual.utoronto.ca/tagliamonte/goldvarb.html.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David, Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Smith, Eric. 2012. Goldvarb Lion. http://individual.utoronto.ca/tagliamonte/goldvarb.html.Google Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice. 1989. The generalization of the verb-second constraint in the history of Yiddish. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice. 1992. Variation and change in Yiddish subordinate clause word order. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 10, 595–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strang, Barbara M. H. 1970. A history of English. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Strobl, Carolin, Boulesteix, Anne-Laure, Kneib, Thomas, Augustin, Thomas & Zeileis, Achim. 2008. Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 307.Google Scholar
Strobl, Carolin, Malley, James & Tutz, Gerhard. 2009. An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods 14, 323–48.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Harald Baayen, R.. 2012. Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24, 135–78.Google Scholar
Thomson, Clara L. 1907. Later Transition English: Legendaries and chroniclers. In Ward, Adolphus W. & Waller, Alfred R. (eds.), The Cambridge history of English literature, vol. 1: From the beginnings to the cycles of romance, 374–401. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Visser, Frederik Theodor. 1963. An historical syntax of the English language, vol. 1. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Walkden, George. 2013. Null subjects in Old English. Language Variation and Change 25, 155–78.Google Scholar
Walkden, George. 2014. Syntactic reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walkden, George. 2016. Null subjects in the Lindisfarne Gospels as evidence for syntactic variation in Old English. In Cuesta, Julia Fernández & Pons Sanz, Sara M. (eds.), The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, author and context (Buchreihe der Anglia), 237–54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wallage, Phillip. 2005. Negation in early English: parametric variation and grammatical competition. PhD thesis, University of York.Google Scholar
Weir, Andrew. 2008. Subject pronoun drop in informal English. MA thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Williams, Alexander. 2000. Null subjects in Middle English existentials. In Pintzuk, Susan, Tsoulas, George & Warner, Anthony (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms, 164–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Richard. 2012. Variably overt and empty expletives with finite (and non-finite) clauses in early English. Paper presented at the International Congress of English Historical Linguistics 17 (ICEHL 17), Zurich.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Richard. 2013. The Geneva Corpus of Middle English Poetry: Its construction and possible applications. www.old-engli.sh/myres%20documents/GeCMEP.pdf.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Richard. 2015. The Parsed Corpus of Middle English Poetry. www.pcmep.net/index.php.Google Scholar