Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:03:03.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysing the huge mailbag: Reception of John Honey's The Language Trap

A controversial publication inspiring linguistic comments by members of the general public

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2018

Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Just after the start of the research project Bridging the Unbridgeable: Linguists, Prescriptivists and the General Public in 2011, we laid our hands on a file called ‘Reactions to L. Trap’. The file contains well over 200 documents: letters, picture postcards, notes, newspaper clippings, and various other items, almost all of them relating to the reception of a pamphlet called The Language Trap, written by John Honey (1933–2001) and published in 1983 by the British National Council for Educational Standards (NCES). The file was offered for sale by Plurabelle Books in Cambridge as part of the late John Honey's library, and acquiring it offered a unique opportunity to study the reception of this highly controversial publication, not only by linguists, but also by the general public. Both groups responded in large numbers to the publicity the pamphlet inspired, in the press as well as on the radio.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 34 , Special Issue 4: “Bridging the Unbridgeable”: Special Issue on Prescriptivism , December 2018 , pp. 13 - 20
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Thanks to John Edwards and Dick Hudson for providing me with background information relating to the reception of The Language Trap, and to Joan Beal for her comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

Ager, D. 2003. Ideology and Image: Britain and Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Amis, K. 1997. The King's English: A Guide to Modern Usage [repr. 1998]. London: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
Beal, J. 2004. English in Modern Times. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
‘British National Corpus.’ Online at <www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk> and <corpus.byu.edu/bnc> (Accessed July 23, 2018).+and++(Accessed+July+23,+2018).>Google Scholar
Burchfield, R. 1981. The Spoken Word: A BBC Guide. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.Google Scholar
Burchfield, R. W. 1996. Fowler's Modern English Usage (rev. 3rd edn., repr. 2004). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burridge, K. 2010. ‘Linguistic cleanliness is next to godliness: Taboo and purism.’ English Today, 26(2), 3–13.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. 1995. Verbal Hygiene. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. 2018. ‘Punch as a satirical English usage guide.’ In van Ostade, I. Tieken–Boon (ed.), English Usage Guides. History, Advice, Attitudes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 83–106.Google Scholar
D'Arcy, A. 2007. ‘Like and language ideology: Disentangling fact from fiction.’ American Speech, 82(4), 386–419.Google Scholar
del Rosario Medina Sánchez, B. 2013. ‘Lynne Truss's Eats, Shoots & Leaves and the “Oxford comma”.’ In van Ostade, I. Tieken–Boon (ed.), Prescription and Prescriptivism. MA Course Papers. Leiden University Centre for Linguistics, pp. 72–87.Google Scholar
Ebner, C. 2017. Proper English Usage: A Sociolinguistic Investigation of Usage Attitudes in British English. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. 1983. Review of John Honey, The Language Trap (1983). Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2, 67–76.Google Scholar
Fowler, H. W. 1926. A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graddol, D. & Swann, J. 1988. ‘Trapping linguists: An analysis of linguists’ responses to John Honey's pamphlet “The Language Trap”.’ Language and Education, 2(2), 95–111.Google Scholar
Honey, J. 1983. The Language Trap: Race, Class and the ‘Standard English’ Issue in British Schools. Kenton, Middlesex: National Council for Educational Standards.Google Scholar
Honey, J. 1995. ‘A new rule for the Queen and I?.’ English Today 11(4), 3–8.Google Scholar
Honey, J. 1997. Language is Power: The Story of Standard English and its Enemies. London/Boston: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Ilson, R. F. 1985. ‘Usage problems in British and American English.’ In Greenbaum, S. (ed.), The English Language Today. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 166–82.Google Scholar
Keith, G. 1990. ‘Language study at Key Stage 3.’ In Carter, R. (ed.), Knowledge about Language and the Curriculum (The LINC Readers). London: Hodder & Stoughton, pp. 69–103.Google Scholar
Kerswill, P. 2003. ‘Dialect levelling and geographical diffusion in British English.’ In Britain, D. & Cheshire, J. (2003) (eds.), Social Dialectology. In Honour of Peter Trudgill. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 223–43.Google Scholar
Lange, C. 2012. ‘John Honey AND.’ Online at <bridgingtheunbridgeable.com/2012/04/12/john-honey-and> (Accessed October 3, 2017).+(Accessed+October+3,+2017).>Google Scholar
Mair, C. 2006. Twentieth-Century English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. & Milroy, L. [1985] 2012. Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English (4th edn.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
‘Oxford Education Society, interview with Sir Peter Newsam.’ Online at www.oxes.org.uk/about-us/featured-alumni/peter-newsam/ (Accessed April 29, 2018).Google Scholar
‘Oxford English Dictionary.’ Online at <www.oed.com> (Accessed October 3, 2017).+(Accessed+October+3,+2017).>Google Scholar
Tieken–Boon van Ostade, I. (in progress). Describing Prescriptivism.Google Scholar
‘Urban Dictionary.’ Online at <www.urbandictionary.com/> (Accessed October 3, 2017).+(Accessed+October+3,+2017).>Google Scholar
Weiner, E. 1988. ‘On editing a usage guide.’ In Stanley, E. G. & Hoad, T. F. (eds.), Words for Robert Burchfield's Sixty-Fifth Birthday. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, pp. 171–83.Google Scholar