Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:27:37.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predicting the future of English

Considerations when engaging with the public

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2017

Sandra Jansen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Predicting the future of English has been an exercise linguists have engaged with in academic settings for a long time, e.g. Sélincourt (1928), Jagger (1940), Quirk (1972) and Kortmann (2001). Mair (2013: 314) remarks that ‘in spite of the known risks involved in the task, there is no dearth of prophets in the linguistic community’. While he does not discuss the ‘known risks’ in his chapter, he does show that a lot of these predictions have not become true over the course of time.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 52 - 55
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burridge, K. & Bergs, A. 2017. Understanding Language Change. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. 1995. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. 2013. ‘Research ethics in linguistics.’ In Podesva, R. & Sharma, D. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook in Research Methods in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–26.Google Scholar
The Economist . 2011. ‘Geordie's still alreet: Some accents are becoming more distinctive and others more widespread.’ June 2.Google Scholar
Fox, S., Cheshire, J. & Kerswill, P. 2011–2015. Linguistics Research Digest. Online at <http://linguistics-research-digest.blogspot.co.uk/p/about.html> (Accessed February 17, 2017).+(Accessed+February+17,+2017).>Google Scholar
Graddol, D. 1997. The Future of English? A Guide to Forecasting the Popularity of the English Language in the 21st Century. London: British Council.Google Scholar
Jagger, H. J. 1940. English in the Future. London: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
Jansen, S. 2014. ‘Salience effects in the north-west of England.’ Linguistik Online, 66(4), 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, B. 2001 ‘In the year 2525 … Reflections on the future shape of English.’ Anglistik, 12, 97–114.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 2007. ‘Sociolinguistics: An interview with William Labov.’ Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem – ReVEL, 5(9).Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mair, C. 2013. ‘Speculating on the future of English as a contact language.’ In Schreier, D. & Hundt, M. (eds.), English as a Contact Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 314–28.Google Scholar
Murphy, M. L. 2006–2017. ‘Separated by a common language.’ Online at <https://separatedbyacommonlanguage.blogspot.co.uk/> (Accessed February 17, 2017).+(Accessed+February+17,+2017).>Google Scholar
National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement. 2017. ‘What is public engagement?’ Online at <https://www.publicengagement.ac.uk/explore-it/what-public-engagement> (Accessed March 16, 2017).+(Accessed+March+16,+2017).>Google Scholar
Quirk, R. 1972. ‘English in twenty years.’ In Quirk, R. (ed.), The English Language and Images of Matter. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 68–76.Google Scholar
Savill, R. 2010. ‘British regional accents “still thriving”: Britain's regional accents are becoming more widespread despite the increasingly homogeneous nature of society, according to academic studies.’ The Telegraph, January, 3.Google Scholar
de Sélincourt, B. 1928. Pomona or The Future of English. New York: Dutton, E. P.. Online at <http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015008020367;view=1up;seq=11;size=125> (Accessed February17, 2017).Google Scholar
Setter, J. 2016. ‘The future of those tricky ‘th’ sounds.’ Blog: A World of Englishes. <http://aworldofenglishes.blogspot.co.uk/2016/09/the-future-of-those-tricky-th-sounds.html> (Accessed February 17, 2017).Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, J. & Timmins, C. 2006. ‘“Tell her to shut her moof”: The role of the lexicon in TH-fronting in Glaswegian.’ In Kay, C. J., Caie, G. D., Hough, C. & Wotherspoon, I. (eds.), The Power of Words. Essays in Lexicography, Lexicology and Semantics: In Honour of Christian J. Kay. Rodopi: Amsterdam, pp. 171–83.Google Scholar
Sunderland, D. 2016. ‘Geordie accent could disappear, experts claim.’ Consett Magazine, October, 2.Google Scholar
Survey of English Usage. 2012–2017. Englicious. Online at <http://www.englicious.org/> (Accessed February 17, 2017).+(Accessed+February+17,+2017).>Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B. 2014. ‘On the sorts of changes that linguists can(not) predict.’ Paper presented at the 3rd Conference of the International Society for the Linguistics of English, University of Zürich, 24–27 August, 2014.Google Scholar
Watt, D. & Gunn, B. 2016. ‘The sound of 2066: A report commissioned by HSBC’. Online at <http://www.about.hsbc.co.uk/news-and-media/the-sound-of-britain-in-2066> (Accessed 17 February 2017).+(Accessed+17+February+2017).>Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. 2012. ‘In the profession: Connecting with the public.’ Journal of English Linguistics, 40(1), 111–17.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. 2016. ‘Linguist-community collaboration and shifting linguistic identities.’ Plenary talk at NWAV 16, Simon Fraser University/University of Victoria.Google Scholar