Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:43:48.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Next Best Thing to Getting Married: Partnerships among the Jewelry Manufacturers in the Providence/Attleboro Area during the Nineteenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Duol Kim
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aims at enhancing our understanding of how industrial conditions affect the choice of a firm's ownership structure. The Providence/Attleboro area was a center of jewelry production during the nineteenth century. Because of the differentiated nature of the product, the Providence/Attleboro jewelers needed to promote their products among the wholesalers in distant markets. These geographical and industrial conditions motivated the entrepreneurs to organize partnerships for ameliorating informational asymmetries and for mobilizing the capital required to achieve economies of scale in sales and production.

Type
Articles
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 106 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2007. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Clark, Victor S. History of Manufactures in the United States. Washington, D.C., 1929.Google Scholar
Daggett, John. A Sketch of the History ofAttleborough: From Its Settlement to the Division. Boston, Mass., 1894.Google Scholar
Gibb, George. The Whitesmiths of Taunton: A History of Reed and Barton 1824–1943. Cambridge, Mass., 1946.Google Scholar
Hart, Oliver. Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure. New York, 1995.Google Scholar
Lopez, Robert. The Commercial Revolution of the Middle Ages, 950–1350. New York, 1976.Google Scholar
Lopez, Robert, and Irving, Raymond, eds. Medieval Trade in the Mediterranean World. New York, 2001.Google Scholar
May, Earl C. Century of Silver, 1847-1947: Connecticut Yankees and a Noble Metal. New York, 1947.Google Scholar
Purtell, Joseph. The Tiffany Touch. New York, 1971.Google Scholar
Rorabaugh, W.J. The Craft Apprentice: From Franklin to the Machine Age in America. New York, 1986.Google Scholar
Scranton, Philip. Endless Novelty: Specialty Production and American Industrialization, 1865-1925. Princeton, N.J., 1997.Google Scholar
Stone, Orra L. History of Massachusetts Industries: Their Inception, Growth and Success. Boston, Mass., 1930.Google Scholar
Tirole, Jean. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, Mass., 1988.Google Scholar
Udovitch, Abraham L. Partnership and Profit in Medieval Islam. Princeton, N.J., 1970.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Alfred. Why Providence? How Did It Become the Jewelry Center of the U.S.? An Introduction to the First 100 Years. Providence, R.I., 1992.Google Scholar

Articles and Essays

Aghion, Philippe, and Bolton, Patrick. “An Incomplete Contract Approach to Financial Contracting.” Review of Economic Studies 59 (July 1992): 473–94.Google Scholar
Alchian, Armen, and Demsetz, Harold. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.” American Economic Review 62 (Dec. 1972): 777–95.Google Scholar
Atack, Jeremy, and Bateman, Fred. “U.S. Historical Statistics: Nineteenth-Century U.S. Industrial Development through the Eyes of the Census ofManufactures: A New Resources for Historical Research.” Historical Methods 32 (Fall 1999): 177–88.Google Scholar
Byrne, Eugene H. “Commercial Contracts of the Genoese in the Syrian Trade of the Twelfth Century.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 31 (Nov. 1916): 128–70.Google Scholar
Cai, Hongbin. “A Theory of Joint Asset Ownership.” Rand Journal of Economics 34 (Spring 2003): 63–77.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica (Nov. 1937): 386–405.Google Scholar
Gaynor, Martin, and Gertler, Paul. “Moral Hazard and Risk Spreading in Partnership.“ RAND Journal of Economics 26 (Winter 1995): 591–613.Google Scholar
Grandy, Christopher. “New Jersey Corporate Chartermongering, 1875-1929.” Journal of Economic History 49 (Sept. 1989): 677–92.Google Scholar
Grossman, Sanford J. and Hart, Oliver. “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration.” Journal of Political Economy 94 (Aug. 1986): 691–719.Google Scholar
Hart, Oliver, and Moore, John. “Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm.” Journal ofPolitical Economy 98 (Dec. 1990): 1119–58.Google Scholar
Lane, Frederic C. “Family Partnerships and Joint Ventures in the Venetian Republic.” Journal of Economic History 4 (Nov. 1944): 178–96.Google Scholar
Lane, Frederic C. “Investment and Usury.” In Venice and History: The Collected Papers of Frederic C. Lane, ed. Frederic, Lane. Baltimore, Md., 1966, pp. 56–68.Google Scholar
Lang, Kevin, and Gordon, Peter-John. “Partnerships as Insurance Devices: Theory and Evidence“ RAND Journal of Economics 26 (Winter 1995): 614–29.Google Scholar
Li, Shuhe, and Zhang, Weiying. “Optimal Assignment of Principalship in Teams.” Journal ofEconomic Behavior and Organization 44 (Jan. 2001): 105–27.Google Scholar
Moore, William T. “Partnerships.” In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance, ed. Newman, Peter, Milgate, Murray, and Eatwell, John, 3 vols. New York, 1992: vol. 3, pp. 121–22.Google Scholar
Postan, M.M. “Partnership in English Medieval Commerce.“ In Medieval Trade and Finance, ed. Postan, M.M.. New York, 1973, pp. 65–91.Google Scholar
de Roover, Florence Edler. “Partnership Accounts in Twelfth Century Genoa.” Bulletin of the Business History Society 15 (Dec. 1941): 87–92.Google Scholar
Scranton, Philip. “Diversity in Diversity: Flexible Production and American Industrialization, 1880-1930.” Business History Review 65 (Spring 1991): 27–90.Google Scholar
Scranton, Philip. “The Horrors of Competition: Innovation and Paradox in Rhode Island’s Jewelry Industry, 1860-1914.” Rhode Island History 55 (May 1997): 47–67.Google Scholar

Trade Publications

The Manufacturing Jeweler [Dec. 1885, Dec 1886, Dec 1887, 1 Oct. 1889, 15 Nov. 1894, 22 Oct. 1896, 18 March 1897, 4 April 1901, 30 Oct. 1902, 1 Jan. 1903, 10 March 1904, 4 May 1905, 16 Nov. 1905, 26 Dec. 1907, 9 April 1908, 5 Aug. 1909, 24 June 1909].Google Scholar

Government Documents

U.S. Bureau of the Census. The Census of the United States. Washington, D.C., various years.Google Scholar

Unpublished Sources

Bodenhorn, Howard. “Partnership and Hold-Up in Early America.” NBER Working Paper no. 8814. Feb. 2002.Google Scholar
Kim, Duol. “Firm Financing, Ownership Structure and Market Competition in the United States Manufacturingduringthe Nineteenth Century.” Ph.D. diss., UCLA, 2003.Google Scholar
Kim, Duol. “The Popularity of Partnership in United States Manufacturing during the Nineteenth Century.” Paper presented to All-UC Group in Economic History Meeting, San Francisco, Oct. 2003.Google Scholar

Archival Sources

U.S. National Archives and Record Administration, Non-population Census Schedule for Massachusetts, 1850–1880, Microfilm ID T1204, 5, 6, 15, 21, 30, 31, 32.Google Scholar
R.G. Dun and Company Collection, Baker Library, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Rhode Island State Archives, Non-population Census Schedule for Rhode Island, 1850–1880, Providence, R.I.Google Scholar