Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:07:09.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Telephone Patents: Intellectual Property, Business, and the Law in the United States and Britain, 1876—1900

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Christopher Beauchamp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This dissertation summary introduces a new perspective on the legal and economic history of patents in the late nineteenth century. Through a case study of the early telephone industry in Britain and the United States, the dissertation explores interactions between business strategies and national legal regimes, and proposes a revised view of the multi-layered relationship between patents and industrial organization.

Type
Dissertation Summaries
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 591 - 601
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2008. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Aitken, William. Who Invented the Telephone? London: Blackie, 1939.Google Scholar
Dutton, H.I. The Patent System and Inventive Activity during the Industrial Revolution 1750–1852, chap. 4. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Evenson, A. Edward. The Telephone Patent Conspiracy of 1876: The El-isha Gray-Alexander Bell Controversy and Its Many Players. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2000.Google Scholar
Hughes, Thomas P. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Adam, and Josh, Lerner. Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do about It. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Murmann, Johann Peter. Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Co-evolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Noble, David F. America by Design: Science, Technology, and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism, 84–108. New York: Knopf, 1977.Google Scholar
Nye, David E. Technology Matters: Questions to Live With, 136–7. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Frederick Leland. Beginnings of Telephony. New York: Harperand Brothers, 1929.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel T. Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Shulman, Seth. The Telephone Gambit: Chasing Alexander Graham Bell’s Secret. New York: W.W. Norton, 2008.Google Scholar
Usselman, Steven W. Regulating Railroad Innovation: Business, Technology, and Politics in America, 1840–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Articles and Essays

Cooper, Carolyn C., ed. “Special Issue: Patents and Invention.” Technology and Culture 32 (1991).Google Scholar
Guagnini, Anna, and Ian, Inkster, eds. “Special Issue: Patents in History.” History of Technology 24 (2002).Google Scholar
Khan, B. Zorina. “Property Rights and Patent Litigation in Early Nineteenth-Century America.” Journal of Economic History 55 (1995): 58–97.Google Scholar
Khan, B. Zorina. The Democratization of Invention: Patents and Copyrights in American Economic Development, 1790–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi, and Kenneth, Sokoloff. “Inventors, Firms, and the Market for Technology in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries.” In Learning by Doing in Markets, Firms, and Countries, edited by Naomi, Lamoreaux, Raff Daniel, M.G., and Peter, Temin 19–60. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Christine. “Negotiating the Rewards of Invention: The Shop-Floor Inventor in Victorian Britain.” Business History 41 (1999): 17–36.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, andMargaret, Somers. “The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 22 (1980): 174–97.Google Scholar

Newspapers and Magazines

“The Infringement of Patent Rights,” Telegraphic Journal and Electrical Review, Nov. 1, 1879, pp. 347–8.Google Scholar