Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:11:22.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comments on Comments, or the Richness of Dialogue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Eric Godelier
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

If my initial essay at a minimum had the objective of generating a debate and fruitful exchanges, it has succeeded. Of course, probably because of the inevitable ambiguities of translation, some of Chris Kobrak's, Andrew Popp's, and Paul Tiffany's comments suggest that a few further remarks are in order to clarify a set of ideas and allow further developments or discussions.

Type
Response
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 837 - 846
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2009. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See James March’s and Nils Brunsson’s work in this area. Helpful material may be found at: James, March and Olsen, J.P., eds., Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations (Bergen: Universitatsforlaget, 1976);Google Scholar id., “ The Uncertainty of the Past,” European Journal of Political Research 3 (1975): 147–71; Nils, Brunsson, The Irrational Organization (New York: Wiley, 1985);Google Scholar and id., The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions, and Actions in Organizations (Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press, 2002).

2. Lenclud, G., “La perspective fonctionnaliste,” in Les idees en anthropologie, ed. Descola, P., Lenclud, G., Severi, C., and Taylor, A.-C. (Paris: Armand Colin, 1988), 107.Google Scholar

3. Doublet, J.-M. and Fridenson, P., “L’histoire et la gestion: un pari,” in Revue francaise de gestion, 70, September-October (1988).Google Scholar

4. Coriat, B. and Weinstein, O., Les nouvelles theories de l’entreprise (Paris: le Livre de poche, 1995), 185.Google Scholar

5. Godelier, E., La Culture d’entreprise (Paris: La decouverte, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. Elias, N., La societe deCour, Paris, Flammarion, coll. “Champs”, réed£. 1985, p. 149.Google Scholar

7. Laufer, R., “Les institutions du management: legitimite, organisation et nouvelle rhetorique,” in Les nouvelles fondations des sciences de gestion, ed. David, A., Hatchuel, A., and Laufer, R. (Paris: Vuibert, 2001).Google Scholar

8. Godelier, E. (dir), “Elites manageriales et mondialisation,” Special issue, Entreprises et Histoire no. 41 (2006).Google Scholar

9. Bourdieu, P., Homo academicus (Paris: Les editions de Minuit, 2005).Google Scholar

10. R. Laufer, «Les Institutions du management».