Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:09:24.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Climate exposure, vulnerability and environmental reliance: a cross-section analysis of structural and stochastic poverty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2018

Arild Angelsen*
Affiliation:
School of Economics and Business, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia
Therese Dokken
Affiliation:
School of Economics and Business, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway
*
*Corresponding author. Email: arild.angelsen@nmbu.no

Abstract

We analyze links between exposure to climate extremes and shocks, vulnerability and coping strategies, environmental reliance and poverty among 7,300 households in forest adjacent communities in 24 developing countries. We combine observed income with predicted income to create four categories of households: income & asset poor (structurally poor), income rich & asset poor (stochastically non-poor), income poor & asset rich (stochastically poor) and income & asset rich (structurally non-poor), and assess exposure and vulnerability across these groups. The income poor are more exposed to extreme climate conditions. They tend to live in dryer (and hotter) villages in the dry forest zones, in wetter villages in the wet zones, and experience larger rainfall fluctuations. Among the income-generating coping strategies, extracting more environmental resources ranks second to seeking wage labor. The poorest in dry regions also experience the highest forest loss, undermining the opportunities to cope with future climate shocks.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainembabazi, JH, Shively, G and Angelsen, A (2013) Charcoal production and household welfare in Uganda: a quantile regression approach. Environment and Development Economics 18(5), 537558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelsen, A and Dokken, T (2015) Environmental reliance, climate exposure, and vulnerability: a cross-section analysis of structural and stochastic poverty, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 7474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelsen, A and Rudel, TK (2013) Designing and implementing effective REDD + policies: a forest transition approach. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 7(1), 91113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelsen, A, Jagger, P, Babigumira, R, Belcher, B, Hogarth, NJ, Bauch, S, Börner, J, Smith-Hall, C and Wunder, S (2014) Environmental income and rural livelihoods: a global-comparative analysis. World Development 64(S1), S12S28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, MR and May, J (2001) One kind of freedom: poverty dynamics in post-apartheid South Africa. World Development 29(12), 19872006.Google Scholar
Chomitz, KM, Buys, P, De Luca, G, Thomas, T and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S (2007) At Loggerheads? Agricultural Expansion, Poverty Reduction, and Environment in the Tropical Forests. Washington, DC: World Bank Policy Research Report.Google Scholar
Debela, B, Shively, G, Angelsen, A and Wik, M (2012) Economic shocks, diversification, and forest use in Uganda. Land Economics 88(1), 139154.Google Scholar
Dercon, S (2002) Income risk, coping strategies, and safety nets. World Bank Research Observer 17(2), 141166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dercon, S (2005) Insurance against Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dercon, S and Krishnan, P (2000) Vulnerability, seasonality and poverty in Ethiopia. The Journal of Development Studies 36(6), 2553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dokken, T and Angelsen, A (2015) Forest reliance across poverty groups in Tanzania. Ecological Economics 117, 203211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duraiappah, AK (1998) Poverty and environmental degradation: a review and analysis of the nexus. World Development 26(12), 21692179.Google Scholar
Ellis, F (2000) Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
FAO (2000) FRA 2000. On definitions of forest and forest change. Forest Resources Assessment WP 33. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Field, C, Barros, V, Mach, K and Mastrandrea, M (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, M and Shively, G (2005) Can income programs reduce tropical forest pressure? Income shocks and forest use in Malawi. World Development 33, 11151128.Google Scholar
Hallegatte, S, Bangalore, M, Bonzanigo, L, Fay, M, Kane, T, Narloch, U, Rozenberg, J, Treguer, D and Vogt-Schilb, A (2015) Shock Waves: Managing the Impacts of Climate Change on Poverty. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications. Available at https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/22787.Google Scholar
Hansen, MC, Stehman, SV and Potapov, PV (2010) Quantification of global gross forest cover loss. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(19), 86508655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, I, Jones, P, Osborn, T and Lister, D (2014) Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations–the CRU TS3. 10 dataset. International Journal of Climatology 34(3), 623642.Google Scholar
Heltberg, R, Oviedo, AM and Talukdar, F (2015) What do household surveys really tell us about risk, shocks, and risk management in the developing world? Journal of Development Studies 51(3), 209225.Google Scholar
Hulme, D and Shepherd, A (2003) Conceptualizing chronic poverty. World Development 31(3), 403423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC (2014) Annex II: glossary [Mach, KJ, Planton, S and von Stecho, C (eds.)]. In Core Writing Team, Pachauri, RK and Meyer, LA (eds). Climate Change 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC, pp. 117130.Google Scholar
Lufumpa, CL (2005) The poverty–environment nexus in Africa. African Development Review 17(3), 366381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, A (1992) The forest transition. Area 24, 367379.Google Scholar
Moser, C and Felton, A (2007) Intergenerational asset accumulation and poverty reduction in Guayaquil, Ecuador, 1978–2004. In Addison, T, Hulme, D and Kanbur, R (eds). Reducing Global Poverty: The Case for Asset Accumulation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 1550.Google Scholar
Niang, I, Ruppel, OC, Abdrabo, MA, Essel, A, Lennard, C, Padgham, J, Urquhart, P (2014) Africa. In Field, CB, Barros, VR, Dokken, DJ, Mach, KJ, Mastrandrea, MD, Bilir, TE, Chatterjee, M, Ebi, KL, Estrada, YO, Genova, RC, Girma, B, Kissel, ES, Levy, AN, MacCracken, S, Mastrandrea, PR and White, LL (eds). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK & New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11991265.Google Scholar
Nielsen, MR, Pouliot, M and Bakkegaard, RK (2012) Combining income and assets measures to include the transitory nature of poverty in assessments of forest dependence: evidence from the Democratic Republic of Congo. Ecological Economics 78, 3746.Google Scholar
Nøstbakken, L and Conrad, JM (2007) Uncertainty in bioeconomic modelling. In Weintraub, A, Romero, C, Bjørndal, T and Epstein, R (eds). Handbook of Operations Research in Natural Resources. New York: Springer, pp. 217235.Google Scholar
Porter, JR, Xie, L, Challinor, AJ, Cochrane, K, Howden, SM, Iqbal, MM, Lobell, DB, Travasso, MI (2014) Food security and food production systems. In Field, CB, Barros, VR, Dokken, DJ, Mach, KJ, Mastrandrea, MD, Bilir, TE, Chatterjee, M, Ebi, KL, Estrada, YO, Genova, RC, Girma, B, Kissel, ES, Levy, AN, MacCracken, S, Mastrandrea, PR and White, LL (eds). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, And Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK & New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 485533.Google Scholar
Reardon, T and Vosti, SA (1995) Links between rural poverty and the environment in developing countries: asset categories and investment poverty. World Development 23(9), 14951506.Google Scholar
Rose, E (2001) Ex ante and ex post labor supply response to risk in a low-income area. Journal of Development Economics 64, 371388.Google Scholar
Settele, J, Scholes, R, Betts, R, Bunn, S, Leadley, P, Nepstad, D, Overpeck, JT, Taboada, MA (2014) Terrestrial and inland water systems. In Field, CB, Barros, VR, Dokken, DJ, Mach, KJ, Mastrandrea, MD, Bilir, TE, Chatterjee, M, Ebi, KL, Estrada, YO, Genova, RC, Girma, B, Kissel, ES, Levy, AN, MacCracken, S, Mastrandrea, PR and White, LL (eds). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, And Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK & New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 271359.Google Scholar
Takasaki, Y (2011) Do the commons help augment mutual insurance among the poor? World Development 39, 429438.Google Scholar
Takasaki, Y, Barham, BL and Coomes, OT (2004) Risk coping strategies in tropical forests: floods, illnesses, and resource extraction. Environment and Development Economics 9, 203224.Google Scholar
Takasaki, Y, Barham, BL and Coomes, OT (2010) Smoothing income against crop flood losses in Amazonia: rain forest or rivers as a safety net? Review of Development Economics 14, 4863.Google Scholar
Völker, M and Waibel, H (2010) Do rural households extract more forest products in times of crisis? Evidence from the mountainous uplands of Vietnam. Forest Policy and Economics 12, 407414.Google Scholar
Wunder, S, Börner, J, Shively, G and Wyman, M (2014) Safety nets, gap filling and forests: a global-comparative perspective. World Development 64(S1), S29S42.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Angelsen and Dokken supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Angelsen and Dokken supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 238.7 KB