Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:04:00.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impacts of the Brazilian NDC and their contribution to the Paris agreement on climate change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2019

Angelo C. Gurgel ,
Sergey Paltsev  and
Gustavo Velloso Breviglieri Open the ORCID record for Gustavo Velloso Breviglieri [Opens in a new window]
Angelo C. Gurgel*
Affiliation:
São Paulo School of Economics, Fundação Getulio Vargas, São Paulo, Brazil
Sergey Paltsev
Affiliation:
MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge, MA, USA
Gustavo Velloso Breviglieri
Affiliation:
Center for Sustainability Studies, Business Administration School of São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas, São Paulo, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: angelo.gurgel@fgv.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper measures the economic impacts of Brazil's climate mitigation strategies contained in its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC). To do so, we employ the computable general equilibrium MIT Economic Projection and Policy Analysis model and simulate alternative carbon pricing scenarios (sectoral versus economy-wide carbon markets), set to achieve the country's overall emissions targets announced under the Paris Agreement. The results show relatively cheap emissions reductions from land-use changes and agriculture in the short run: the cost of the Brazilian NDC is predicted to be only 0.7 per cent of GDP in 2030. Further efforts to reduce carbon emissions beyond 2030 would require policy changes, since all the potential emissions reductions from deforestation would be finished and the capacity to expand renewable energy sources would be constrained. In this case, an economy-wide carbon pricing system would help substantially to avoid higher compliance costs.

Keywords

Brazilcarbon pricingclimate policycomputable general equilibriumParis agreement
Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , August 2019 , pp. 395 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrow, KJ and Debreu, G (1954) Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica 22, 265–290.Google Scholar
Brazil (2008) Plano Nacional Sobre Mudança do Clima – PNMC. Brasília: Comitê Interministerial Sobre Mudança do Clima, Governo Federal (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
Brazil (2016) Third National Communication of Brazil to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change – Volume III. Brasília: Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation.Google Scholar
Brooke, A, Kendrick, D, Meeraus, A and Raman, R (1988) GAMS: A User's Guide. Washington, DC: GAMS Development Corporation.Google Scholar
Carvalho, TS, Domingues, EP and Horridge, JM (2017) Controlling deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: regional economic impacts and land-use change. Land Use Policy 64, 327–341.Google Scholar
Chen, YHH, Paltsev, S, Reilly, J, Morris, J, Karplus, V, Gurgel, A, Winchester, N, Kishimoto, P, Blanc, E and Babiker, M (2017) The MIT Economic Projection and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model: Version 5. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Dimaranan, B and Mcdougall, R (2002) Global Trade, Assistance, and Production: The GTAP5 Data Base. West Lafayette: Center for Global Trade Analysis.Google Scholar
EMCB (2010) Economia da Mudança do Clima no Brasil: Custos e Oportunidades. São Paulo: IBEP Gráfica (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
EPE (2010) Balanço Energético Nacional 2010: Ano Base 2009. Rio de Janeiro: Empresa de Pesquisa Energética (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
EPE (2011) Balanço Energético Nacional 2011: Ano Base 2010. Rio de Janeiro: Empresa de Pesquisa Energética (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
EPE (2012) Balanço Energético Nacional 2012: Ano Base 2011. Rio de Janeiro: Empresa de Pesquisa Energética (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
Feijó, FT and Porto, S Jr. (2009) Protocolo de quioto e o bem estar econômico no Brasil uma análise utilizando equilíbrio geral computável. Análise Econômica 51, 127–154 (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
Ferreira Filho, JBS and Moraes, GI (2015) Climate change, agriculture and economic effects on different regions of Brazil. Environment and Development Economics 20, 37–56.Google Scholar
Ferreira Filho, JBS and Rocha, MT (2008) Economic evaluation of public policies aiming the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil. Journal of Economic Integration 23, 709–733.Google Scholar
Gurgel, AC and Paltsev, S (2014) Costs of reducing GHG emissions in Brazil. Climate Policy 14, 209–223.Google Scholar
Gurgel, A, Reilly, JM and Paltsev, S (2007) Potential land use implications of a global biofuels industry. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization 5, article 9.Google Scholar
Hochstetler, K and Viola, E (2012) Brazil and the politics of climate change: beyond the global commons. Environmental Politics 21, 753–771.Google Scholar
IBGE (1995) Censo Agropecuário: 1995/96. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
IBGE (2006) Censo Agropecuário 2006. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
IEA (2011) World Energy Outlook. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
IMF (2011) World Economic and Financial Surveys: World Economic Outlook Database. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Keohane, RO and Victor, DG (2016) Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change 6, 570–575.Google Scholar
Kober, T, Summerton, P, Pollitt, H, Chewpreecha, U, Ren, X, Wills, W, Octaviano, C, McFarland, J, Beach, R, Cai, Y, Calderon, S, Fisher-Vanden, K and Rodriguez, AML (2016) Macroeconomic impacts of climate change mitigation in Latin America: a cross-model comparison. Energy Economics 56, 625–636.Google Scholar
Kydland, F and Prescott, EC (1996). The computational experiment: an econometric tool. Journal of Economic Perspectives 10, 69–85.Google Scholar
La Rovere, EL, Pereira, AS and Simões, AF (2011) Biofuels and sustainable energy development in Brazil. World Development 39, 1026–1036.Google Scholar
La Rovere, EL, Pereira, AO Jr., Dubeux, CBS and Wills, W (2014) Climate change mitigation actions in Brazil. Climate and Development 6, 25–33.Google Scholar
LAPIG (2015) Mapa Síntese da Área de Pastagens no Brasil (Sexta Versão). Goiânia, GO: Laboratório de Processamento de Imagens e Geoprocessamento (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
Lefèvre, J, Wills, W and Hourcade, JC (2018). Combining low-carbon economic development and oil exploration in Brazil? An energy–economy assessment. Climate Policy 18, 1286–1295.Google Scholar
Lucena, AFP, Clarke, L, Schaeffer, R, Szklo, A, Rochedo, PRR, Nogueira, LPP, Daenzer, K, Gurgel, A, Kitous, A and Kober, T (2016) Climate policy scenarios in Brazil: a multi-model comparison for energy. Energy Economics 56, 564–574.Google Scholar
Magalhães, AS and Domingues, EP (2016) Aumento da eficiência energética no Brasil: uma opção para uma economia de baixo carbono? Revista Economia Aplicada 20, 273–310 (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
Magalhães, A, Carvalho, T and Domingues, E (2016) Policies for reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and their costs and opportunities for the Brazilian industry. Paper presented at the 44° Encontro Nacional de Economia, 13–16 December 2016, ANPEC, Foz do Iguaçú, PR.Google Scholar
MCTI (2014) Estimativas Anuais de Emissões de Gases de Efeito Estufa no Brasil - 2a Edição. Brasília: Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação – MCTI (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
Melillo, JM, Reilly, JM, Kicklighter, DW, Gurgel, AC, Cronin, TW, Paltsev, S, Felzer, BS, Wang, X, Sokolov, AP and Schlosser, CA (2009) Indirect emissions from biofuels: how important? Science 326, 1397–1399.Google Scholar
Narayanan, BG and Walmsley, TG (2008) Global Trade, Assistance, and Production: The GTAP 7 Data Base. West Lafayette: Center for Global Trade Analysis.Google Scholar
Octaviano, C, Paltsev, S and Gurgel, AC (2016) Climate change policy in Brazil and Mexico: results from the MIT EPPA model. Energy Economics 56, 600–614.Google Scholar
Paltsev, S, Reilly, JM, Jacoby, HD, Eckaus, RS, McFarland, J, Sarofim, M, Asadoorian, M and Babiker, M (2005) The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model: Version 4. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Reilly, J and Fuglie, K (1998) Future yield growth in field crops: what evidence exists? Soil and Tillage Research 47, 275–290.Google Scholar
Rocha, MT (2003) Aquecimento global e o mercado de carbono: uma aplicação do modelo CERT. Ph.D. thesis, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
Rutherford, TF (1995) Extensions of GAMS for complementarity problems arising in applied economic analysis. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 19, 1299–1324.Google Scholar
SEEG (2017) Sistema de Estimativas de Emissões e Remoções de Gases de Efeito Estufa. Available at http://seeg.eco.br/ (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
Shoven, JB and Whalley, JL (1984) Applied general equilibrium models of taxation and international trade: an introduction and survey. Journal of Economic Literature 22, 1007–1051.Google Scholar
Stavins, RN (1996) Correlated uncertainty and policy instrument choice. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30, 218–232.Google Scholar
Tourinho, OAF, da Motta, RS and Alves, YLB (2003) Uma Aplicação Ambiental de um Modelo de Equílibrio Geral. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
UN (2009) World Population Prospects: The 2008 Revision, New York: United Nations Population Division.Google Scholar
UNFCCC (2016) Federative republic of Brazil intended nationally determined contribution towards achieving the objective of the United Nations framework convention on climate change. Available at https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/Brazil%20First/BRAZIL%20iNDC%20english%20FINAL.pdf .Google Scholar
Waugh, C, Paltsev, S, Selin, N, Reilly, J, Morris, J and Sarofim, M (2011) Emission Inventory for NonCO2 Greenhouse Gases and Air Pollutants in EPPA5. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar